Continuing last ep's discussion of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus with some Rudolph Carnap (a logical positivist from the Vienna Circle: “The Rejection of Metaphysics” from his 1935 book Philosophy and Logical Syntax) about what kind of crazy talk is outside of legitimate discourse.
Carnap interprets W as simply ruling out as unscientific most of the talk we'd consider philosophical, i.e. metaphysics, ethics, the self... Or is W really a mystic who just wants to distinguish these from science? Why doesn't he just write more and explain himself? This tricky text inspires Seth to start a cult.
To follow along, read the Tractatus from the beginning through around 4.12, then skip to 6.3 and read to the end, skimming the more technical material in the middle. Buy the book
Also, if you're confused by the description of truth tables (which are hard to picture without seeing some), look here.
End song: "The Last Time," by Mark Lint and the Fake from the 2000 album So Whaddaya Think?