• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • All PEL Episodes
    • Most Recent Episodes
    • Categorized by Topic
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Upcoming Episodes
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Store
    • Cart
    • Checkout
  • Members
    • Membership Options
    • PEL Not School Introduction
    • Log In
  • Support PEL
    • Patreon
  • Write for Us
  • Contact

Episode 171: Buddhism vs. Evolution with Guest Robert Wright (Part Two)

September 11, 2017 by Mark Linsenmayer 6 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_171pt2_8-13-17.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:11:31 — 65.5MB)

Continuing on Why Buddhism Is True. We discuss the "no self" doctrine as articulated in Buddha's so-called Second Discourse, the "Anatta-lakkhana Sutta: The Discourse on the Not-Self Characteristic" and the modularity-of-mind psychological theory that Bob claims supports the Buddhist position. What's the ethical implication of the no-self doctrine, and do we really need meditation to instill ethical insight or the power of self-control?

Continued from part 1, or get the ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

End song: "Alphalpha Bhang" by Anton Barbeau, as interviewed on Nakedly Examined Music ep. 50.

Sponsors: Visit care.com/pel for 30% off a premium membership for in-home elder care. Get 25% off your first order of protein bars at RXBAR.com/PEL, using promo code PEL. Try blinkist.com/pel for audio condensations of non-fiction books.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Buddhism, evolutionary psychology, philosophy podcast, psychology, Robert Wright

Comments

  1. James Wilson says

    September 13, 2017 at 12:33 am

    I thoroughly enjoyed this episode. I think Buddhism has moved past the point of exoticism in the West and can be taken much more seriously, especially aspects of mindfulness that have been used by therapists for quite some time now.
    I thought that Mark and Dylan brought up interesting points about what qualifies for meditation? Does it have to be sitting with oneself in stillness? Can it be listening to music, painting, working on bicycle? I think contemplation needs to be part of the practice. There are plenty of activities where we can become unselfconscious, but we usually don’t learn anything from them, while contributing to the feeling of needing to escape from reality rather than embrace it.
    I think a middle ground between East and West practice could be still meditation with the addition of contemplative writing, especially when it comes to sussing out what our anxieties and troubles may be at the time. Typically if I spend some time trying to makes sense of something troubling me by writing it out on the page, and fleshing out the details; the act of writing helps me make sense of my situation, and those worries no longer seem to have power over me anymore. Which goes to show that much of what we can stew about is just happening in our own mind.
    I don’t practice mediation daily, nor do I write daily or even weekly, but when I do I feel I have a much better sense of my own subjective reality.
    Thanks again for the show, and I’m really glad that there are folks like Robert out there that are giving credence to ancient wisdom.
    -James

    Reply
  2. Graham Jones says

    September 13, 2017 at 10:25 am

    for more information on the history of insight and mindfulness meditation, here’s an interview with a scholar who wrote a book on Ledi Sayadaw, the 19th/20th century burmese monk who developed and popularized the practice. http://newbooksnetwork.com/erik-braun-the-birth-of-insight-meditation-modern-buddhism-and-the-burmese-monk-ledi-sayadaw-university-of-chicago-press-2013/

    here’s also “a primer on buddhist meditation”. a very different analysis than the one offered by wright.
    http://bit.ly/2x1eR4Z

    lopez also has a number of lectures on this history of science + buddhism dialogue and it’s very confused arguments. it would be interesting to put this information in dialogue with wright’s analysis.
    https://youtu.be/FF6rzOSM0Iw
    https://youtu.be/dj88vK5RxsI

    if this podcast is to do another episode on buddhism, shantideva’s bodhicaryavatara would be a better choice as it’s both a historically important text from indian antiquity and it’s used by practitioners today. it’s short, accessible, and maintains an engaging style. the translator Kate Crosby would be a great guest.

    Reply
    • Alan Cook says

      September 14, 2017 at 12:08 pm

      Yes, the Bodhicaryavatara would make a good reading for a podcast. Even better would be to read in in conjunction with Paul Williams’s book Altruism and Reality, or perhaps just the final chapter thereof, which is entitled “How Santideva Destroyed the Bodhisattva Path.” That would combine an important text from the tradition with a high-level contemporary discussion thereof. Here’s an article that discusses and responds to Williams’s argument:

      https://folk.uio.no/jonw/Bodhipath2001a.pdf

      Reply
  3. Carlos Garcia-Suarez says

    September 14, 2017 at 3:18 am

    This is my first post as a full PLE member. I am writing from Madrid (Spain). While I enjoyed Wright’s podcast a lot, and I like very much the work he does, I think he presents the non-self argument in a bit weak form. In fact, the traditional Buddhist argument looks weak also to me. They break a person into parts, or aggregates and the argument go saying that as no of the individual parts is the self (as intuitively understood) then the self-does not exist, it is an illusion. But, you can have things that take shape, precisely as a sum or addition of parts, and then exhibits behaviors that were not present in the individual components. I am talking of course about the idea of emergent properties, But I am trying to go a bit beyond. The self could be something that emerges as a result of the interaction of the parts and that it could be as real as the parts themselves.

    Reply
  4. qapla says

    September 19, 2017 at 4:13 pm

    TMHS 240: Happiness Vs. Pleasure And The Hacking Of The American Mind – With Dr. Robert Lustig

    http://theshawnstevensonmodel.com/robert-lustig/

    Reply
  5. qapla says

    September 24, 2017 at 11:20 am

    There is pleasure
    And there is bliss.
    Forgo the first to posses the second.

    Dhammapada The Sayings of the Buddha 21:1

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Buy the 2018 PEL Calendar
Become a PEL Citizen

Recent Comments

  • Judy Gillis on Episode 187 Follow-Up: The Limits of Free Speech (Citizens Only)
  • Morgan Foster on Episode 187 Follow-Up: The Limits of Free Speech (Citizens Only)
  • Robin Morris on “Lysistrata” w/ Lucy Lawless, Emily Perkins, Erica Spyres, Bill Youmans & Aaron David Gleason
  • Ryley Alger-Hempstead on Episode 186: J.L. Austin on Doing Things with Words (Part Two)
  • Ryley Alger-Hempstead on Episode 186: J.L. Austin on Doing Things with Words (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • Aftershow
  • Audiobook
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • New Books in Philosophy
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | iTunes

Copyright © 2009 - 2018 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy