• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 5: Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics

July 16, 2009 by Mark Linsenmayer 27 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep005_6-28-09.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:41:17 — 100.7MB)

Discussing Books 1 and 2.

What is virtue, and how can I eat it? Do not enjoy this episode too much, or too little, but just the right amount. Apparently, if you haven't already have been brought up with the right habits, you may as well give up. Plus, is Michael Jackson the Aristotelian ideal?

Buy the book or read it online.

End song: A newly recorded cover of Billie Jean by Mark Lint and the TransAmerikanishers. (Hear it by itself here.)

If you enjoy the episode, please donate at least $1:

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Aristotle, Ethics, Michael Jackson, Nichomachean, philosophy, University of Texas

Comments

  1. matth says

    August 15, 2010 at 11:41 pm

    Interesting discussion, you guys were pretty funny at the end of this one. Funny how you mentioned someone might become an expert on someone we only have one sentence to examine from a shard of a clay pot.

    Reply
  2. matth says

    August 15, 2010 at 11:42 pm

    And the idea for the show about debunking popular philosophy myths sounds like it could be a good one.

    Reply
  3. dmf says

    August 13, 2012 at 8:55 am

    http://www.personal.psu.edu/cpl2/blogs/digitaldialogue/2012/08/digital-dialogue-55-aristotle-and-the-tragedy-of-life.html

    Reply
  4. Randy says

    June 22, 2013 at 8:32 pm

    Guys, I have listed to many episodes but finally tracked back to this one.

    I really like that y’all stressed Aristotle’s tendency to observation and collection. The Renaissance’s reaction to late Scholasticism tends to give us an Aristotle who had a stilted, unchangeable system. I like to think of Aristotle as the marine biologist — a collector and categorizer, who built a catalog of knowledge on a wide-range of topics. The virtues to him would’ve been common to most Greeks, having come from Homer and Pindar. Hence, it was easy to use this method to scan a wide range of topics, such as Seth does around :48 on city-states.

    A few other comments from my perspective. I don’t think it is likely Augustine read the Nicomachean Ethics. The usual analogy is (Plato:Augustine::Aristotle:Aquinas).

    Around :40 min, on Mark not relating the virtues to the golden mean: the mean is not “average” or a midpoint. I like to think of it more as the golden ratio. But there is not a formula that lets humans know at one point their courage will tip into foolhardiness. The virtues are to be practiced (This gets fleshed out well in MacIntyre). Hence, ethics is not formulaic or purely intellectual, but rather a practical wisdom.

    This is why in my mind he stands almost in opposition to Kantian ethics. The practice of the virtues can only come by relations between humans. Your uncomfortableness with Aristotle’s conception of the virtues and human flourishing seems to be related to this placing of ethics entirely in a social context. For Aristotle, a modern ethical puzzle like the Trolley Problem would be nonsensical, because no amount of training in the virtues could prepare a person for such a one-off situation. He would find it silly.

    The “how is someone going to be more virtuous by reading this?” question is likely off the mark, because — as y’all mentioned near the beginning of the episode — these were likely Aristotle’s class notes when teaching at the Lyceum. So his instruction was likely still to be dialectical like Plato’s and not textual.

    Near the end, where the rarity of goodness is mentioned, I don’t think this is intended to be dispiriting — there obviously are good people, but rare is the person who exhibits human flourishing (a maximal goodness, if you will, i.e. the last point on the line before tilting into excess).

    Wonderful, wonderful job on these podcasts. You make rush hour traffic bearable!

    Reply
  5. Mark Featherstone says

    September 30, 2015 at 4:33 am

    This is the 4th or 5th podcast I’ve listened to from this highly enjoyable series. Among the many questions that the discussion raised in my mind, one related to an apparent contradiction. In another podcast in this series, it was mentioned that, for the ancient Greeks, virtuousness was indistinguishable from physical beauty. In other words (and shockingly), if you are beautiful or handsome, then you are also virtuous. And yet this extraordinarily superficial correlation is not supported by what I understand Aristotle to have said. Aristotle seemed to have a clear idea of actions (and not simply physical appearance) as key to being virtuous. Nor does he seem to suggest that an outwardly attractive person will be more virtuous, or that practicing the virtues will enhance physical beauty. Was Aristotle at odds with the prevailing views of his times? I’d appreciate some clarification on this point if anyone is interested.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      September 30, 2015 at 9:00 am

      Yes, Plato and then Aristotle (and then the Stoics, etc.) are in critical dialogue with the inherited (Homeric) values of their times. See our episode on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals for I think where we got this idea of the initial Homeric “strength and courage and beauty = virtue” being overtaken by a more subtle and in some cases totally inverted view.

      Reply
      • Mark Featherstone says

        September 30, 2015 at 10:15 am

        Wow, thanks for the prompt reply! Yes, I had jumped ahead to the episode on Nietzsche in which I must have heard you talk about this.

        Reply
        • Mark Featherstone says

          September 30, 2015 at 10:20 am

          I hadn’t appreciated that this conception of virtue was being challenged by Plato’s time, so thanks for the clarification.

          Reply
  6. Kai Kosog says

    April 11, 2017 at 11:26 am

    Hello Hello,
    First off, great show! Your banter and content has been a saving grace for me while at work! Thank you!
    This is the first podcast that I have paid for and it is worth every cent.

    A comment/question:
    If it is not possible to intuit what the virtuous tendencies are from the innate tendencies without habituation or role models, how did it come to pass that these role models came upon their virtues? Or, if, in order to be a good person, one must have the proper virtues instilled into their upbringing since infancy how did it come to pass that anyone became wise/virtuous?
    I guess it seems to me that these “virtues” must either arise/emerge spontaneously or be ubiquitous in our evolutionary path/branch/history…. The latter does not seem to be the case!
    Is there any chance of getting a different media player tool? This one is very basic…. It’s hard to navigate through the episode. I would recommend a system like soundcloud where the audio is visualized and people can comment on discrete sections of the recording… Perhaps at least an extra button to jump back 15 seconds at a time, like on spotify.

    Thanks guys!
    Kai
    Love the show!

    Reply
    • Jennifer Tejada says

      April 11, 2017 at 2:26 pm

      I listen using the podcast app on my iPhone. It’s purple and says “podcasts”. You subscribe to the podcast. It has that 15 second rewind thing. There is a citizen feed also.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. What is a Philosophical Explanation? | The Partially Examined Life | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 1, 2011 at 2:12 am

    […] talk, for instance, about establishing harmony between conflicting parts of the psyche (see Plato, Aristotle, Freud, and […]

    Reply
  2. Topic for #58: Is vs. Ought in 20th Century Ethics | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    June 19, 2012 at 11:36 pm

    […] elaborate this critique as well his historical picture of the evolution of moral thought from Aristotle to the present and his picture of a modern moral realism based, like Aristotle’s, on some […]

    Reply
  3. Topic for #60: Aristotle’s Politics | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 15, 2012 at 8:32 am

    […] around 350 B.C.E.) is presented as a follow-up to his Nichomachean Ethics (which we discussed in a previous episode). Actually, we’re not sure in what order these were composed, and the Politics is internally […]

    Reply
  4. Philosophical Mavericks: Pirsig, MacIntyre, Solomon, Bergmann | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 17, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    […] MacIntyre and Flanagan we saw an effort, begun in the modern age by Hume but highly influenced by Aristotle, to sketch out a picture of morality as a human creation that is nonetheless non-whimsical and […]

    Reply
  5. Mark Vernon on Aristotle’s Philosophy of Friendship | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 27, 2012 at 9:34 am

    […] As mentioned in the episode, Mark Vernon recorded a series of lectures on Aristotle’s philosophy of friendship (listen to the lectures on iTunes). These were published in 2006 in conjunction with his book, The Meaning of Friendship. As stated in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s account of Aristotle’s view, the source material in Aristotle seems to be Books VII and IX of the Nichomachean Ethics. […]

    Reply
  6. Jeff Maynes » Blog Archive » Aristotle Podcasts says:
    September 6, 2012 at 11:17 am

    […] There is also a nice episode on Aristotle’s ethics on the “Partially Examined Life,” which you can download here. […]

    Reply
  7. Filosofiska klassiker uppfräschade av fyra amerikaner | bookfetishist says:
    April 23, 2013 at 3:42 pm

    […] 1.    Aristoteles ”Nichomakiska etiken” […]

    Reply
  8. Aristotle v. Nietzsche on Human Nature (And What This Means for New Work) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    October 15, 2013 at 8:44 am

    […] want to briefly call attention to the transition between virtue ethics as conceived by Aristotle and the jump to Nietzsche in the context of our New Work discussion. I’m not looking up […]

    Reply
  9. Listening to… Ethics podcasts! | Bioethics & Society at King's College London says:
    August 8, 2014 at 2:21 am

    […] Episode 5, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Discussing Books 1 and 2 of the founder of ‘virtue ethics’. How ought we live? What makes for the ‘good life’? […]

    Reply
  10. Topic for #111: Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: How to Interpret | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    April 6, 2015 at 12:34 pm

    […] (1972), which clarified the “non-scientific” character of hermeneutics by bringing in Aristotle and how he contrasts techne (anything involving a method, which could be shoemaking but also […]

    Reply
  11. Philosophy of History Part I: The Enlightenment | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 23, 2015 at 9:57 am

    […] intellectual tradition. On the one hand were the master minds of classical antiquity—Plato, Aristotle, Ptolemy, etc.—and on the other were the prophets, apostles, saints, etc., whose lives and […]

    Reply
  12. Intro Readings in Philosophy Series Starting Now(ish)!!!! | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    March 2, 2016 at 6:25 pm

    […] Reading: Nicomachean Ethics, Books I–III (as discussed in PEL ep. 5) […]

    Reply
  13. Episode 147: Aristotle on Wisdom and Incontinence (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 19, 2016 at 7:00 am

    […] episode continues our discussion from way back in ep. 5, and was commissioned in honor of the wedding of Matthew Decker and Amanda […]

    Reply
  14. Demagogue Lover: Aristophanes's "Wasps" in the Age of Trump | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 26, 2017 at 7:00 am

    […] As many have already noted, Cleon resembles Trump so much that our current president might well be Cleon’s reincarnation. Key similarities include highly emotional theatrics, a craven focus on his own self-interest, and an unrelenting obsession with striking out against the enemy—a category in which he conflated both the city’s enemies and his own. He was “the most violent man in Athens,” according to the historian Thucydides, and “the man who, with his attacks, corrupted the Athenians more than any other,” according to Aristotle. […]

    Reply
  15. Episode 176: Situationism in Psych: Milgram & Stanford Prison Experiments (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 6, 2017 at 8:27 am

    […] Listeners may want to revisit PEL's three episodes on Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, staring with ep. 5. […]

    Reply
  16. On Reactions to Our American Indian Episode | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 24, 2017 at 5:12 pm

    […] we received when we covered polarizing figures like Ayn Rand, or some people didn’t like our initially anti-theological take on Aristotle, or thought we didn’t do justice to Merleau-Ponty or Lacan*, or hated our dismissive attitude […]

    Reply
  17. The Philosophy of Aristotle: A Collection of Online Resources and Key Quotes – The Daily Idea says:
    September 5, 2019 at 7:24 pm

    […] Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Listening to… Ethics podcasts! | Bioethics & Society at King's College London Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?
  • Ronald Cogen on Ep. 311: Understanding the Dao De Jing (Part One)
  • Brian Grindel on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in