• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 11: Nietzsche’s Immoralism: What Is Ethics, Anyway?

November 10, 2009 by Mark Linsenmayer 91 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.libsyn.com/media/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep011_10-18-09.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:51:38 — 102.3MB)

Discussing The Genealogy of Morals (mostly the first two essays) and Beyond Good and Evil Ch. 1 (The Prejudices of Philosophers), 5 (Natural History of Morals), and 9 (What is Noble?).

We go through Nietzsche's convoluted and historically improbable stories about about the transition from master to slave morality and the origin of bad conscience. Why does he diss Christianity? Is he an anti-semite? Was he a lazy, arrogant bastard? What does he actually recommend that we do?

Buy the Genalogy and Beyond Good and Evil or get them online here and here.

End song: "The Greatest F'in Song in the World," from 1998's Mark Lint and the Fake Johnson Trio Get the whole album free.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: anti-Semitism, asceticism, Christianity, Ethics, masters and slaves, meta-ethics, Nietzsche, philosophy podcast, relativism, social contract

Comments

  1. Tristan says

    January 8, 2016 at 7:18 am

    Hi there. Sorry i find the host really immature and difficult to listen to. Grow up.

    Taking Nietzsche (not pronounced ‘ne shee’) literally is missing the point. Step back from your narrow agenda to see the bigger picture. Then you will have your answers. Good analysis at times, stick to that narrative.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      January 8, 2016 at 11:15 am

      You may appreciate our subsequent treatments of him more: http://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2013/11/11/ep84-nietzsche/ gets right at the heart of him, while http://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2015/07/06/ep119-1-nietzsche/ is, well, I’m sure you’re familiar with that book.

      Oh, and sorry I find you condescending and humorless. 🙂

      Reply
    • george says

      October 7, 2020 at 12:27 am

      They’re a bunch of good friends sitting around discussing philosophy.

      Don’t be such a bore, Tristan!

      Reply
    • johnnythunder says

      January 6, 2021 at 4:58 pm

      Starting from the beginning and this is the most interesting and accessible episode so far. I was a philosophy major as an undergrad and my dad was a Philosophy professor so this has been extremely entertaining while I am doing the more drone parts of my job. How can clever and funny guys be humorless?

      Reply
      • Mark Linsenmayer says

        January 6, 2021 at 6:23 pm

        Thanks! (Wait, who’s being humorless?)

        Reply
  2. Anthony Verbalis says

    July 6, 2016 at 8:58 pm

    An informative and entertaining discussion, as usual. Thank you for reading Nietzsche, so I don’t have to. And based on your discussion, I won’t.

    It seems painfully clear there is a short, straight line between Nietzsche’s ideas and the Third Reich. Nietzsche himself may not have been antisemitic, but what a gift his ideas were to racists who all too easily identify with being the master race against inferior “slave” races. I wonder what were Nietzsche’s feelings were about slavery in the US, and whether he ever wrote about it?

    The man might have been brilliant, but that would just put him in the category of “evil genius”. Toxic, toxic stuff.

    Reply
    • Eric says

      February 21, 2018 at 5:45 pm

      I don’t think that is a particularly fair criticism to call his work toxic stuff. It is easy to oversimplify and to cast a grand narrative that labels people as evil or good. After all, every hero needs a villain, and what better way to cast ourselves as virtuous.

      Reply
  3. Chris says

    August 11, 2016 at 1:21 pm

    I have always enjoyed reading Nietzsche. He is a breath of fresh air to read compared to some of the painfully tedious analytic philosophy.

    One of the things that I find interesting about Nietzsche is how seriously he takes the historical and cultural contingency of moral values. He doesn’t operate on the all too common assumption that values are simply embedded within the DNA of nature waiting for any rational individual discover their self-revealing truth. As if moral values are these universal, timeless, transhistorical, transcultural realities. This seems very different than so much of modern moral philosophy.

    I love much of Nietzsche’s negative criticism, but I struggle to see how his positive project can be taken seriously. The question of “what comes next” is something that always left me perplexed and usually unsatisfied. Nietzsche saw that the passing of Christendom meant that there can be no return to pagan naivete. But if the will is bound to no external measure but itself, then what sort of world would come out of such an uncertain a vision? I think he sees two paths for the future: a nihilism where the lack of transcendent aspirations turn us into insects who aspire to nothing beyond the momentary consolations of material contentment, or some great act of will, inspired by a new this-worldly myth powerful enough to replace the old and other-wordly myth of the Christianity (i.e., the myth of the Übermensch).

    Maybe we are all still worshiping the shadow of the Buddha? I’m not really sure. Nonetheless, it’s difficult for me to take the Übermensch stuff seriously.

    Also — I loved the comment on Nietzsche being the philosopher of the angsty adolescent. Reminded me of this existential comic: http://existentialcomics.com/comic/125

    Reply
    • Wayne Schroeder says

      August 12, 2016 at 2:41 am

      Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra outlines three metamorphoses of the spirit

      1) The camel which carries the weight of established values such as education, morality and culture

      2)The lion which destroys and is the critique of all established values, and finally

      3) the child of innocence carrying a mirror which reveals our monstrousness, who creates new values and new principles of evaluation.

      Nietzsche’s stages moving beyond the triumph of nihilism:

      1) Resentment against everything that is active. Projection of blame–“It’s your fault.”

      2) Bad Conscience. Introjection of blame–“It’s my fault.”

      3) The ascetic ideal–Life, salvation is judged according to values that are said to be superior to life–lead to nothingness. The ascetic are carriers (donkey, buffoon) of the weight of responsibility to higher values, rather than the creative lightness of the dancer.

      4) The death of God. The negation of the higher values are replaced by human values (“morals replace religion; utility, progress, even history replace divine values”). This is the higher man who claim to embrace all of reality, but are still carriers, burdened by human values (the Yes of the donkey).

      5) The last man and the man who wants to die. The Last Man says all is vain, “better a nothingness of the will than a will to nothingness.” Here is the “will to deny reactive life itself, and inspires in man the wish to actively destroy himself, a readiness for transmutation by “an active becoming of forces, a triumph of [the aggressivity that belongs to] affirmation in the will to power,” like the “lightening that announces the thunder that follows, what is affirmed.”

      “Joy emerges as the sole motive for philosophizing.” (Ref: Chapter 3 Pure Immanence, “Nietzsche”)

      Reply
  4. Matt Murphy says

    October 3, 2017 at 7:12 am

    Finally getting around to listening to this podcast. Pleased to learn there are so many years to go through. Previously not so pleased to hear the closing music… Until now. “The Greatest F’in Song in the World,” is a F’in triumph. or AN F’in triumph. I feel certain I now know what Tenacious D was singing about in their song “Tribute”.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      October 4, 2017 at 10:00 am

      Glad you dug it. Here’s the rest of that album: http://marklint.com/FJTalbum.html

      Most likely, if you like one song, repeated listens will reveal the virtues of the others.

      Reply
  5. Ryley Alger-Hempstead says

    February 23, 2018 at 3:22 pm

    Hi guys, I’m a big fan of the show.

    So I know you related (and probably Nietzsche related) the slave morality’s development of introspection to Hegel’s master-slave dialectic. I was listening to Beyond Good and Evil on LibriVox and in “Predjudices of Philosophers” he says about the Will that “It is an emotion, in fact the emotion of the command. That which is termed “Freedom of the Will” is essentially the emotion of supremacy and respect TO HIM WHO MUST OBEY (emphasis mine). I am free, he must obey.”

    The Hegel interpretation definitely makes sense to me but I don’t really get what he’s saying here “respect to him who must obey,” surely the one who wills would not only not respect one who obeys, but wouldn’t have the ability to consider it, since the blonde beasts just “did” things and never thought about them.

    I also thought this quote would be interesting (apologies if it seems like I’m implying that you guys aren’t familiar with this) to Wes, when in the 1984/Orwell episode, he mentioned about the problem of all “will to power” theories boiling down to pleasure

    Reply
    • Em says

      September 27, 2021 at 10:52 am

      Maybe your dilemma could be the result of an inaccurate quote? If “supremacy and respect to…” is actually “supremacy IN respect to…[emphasis added]” then it all makes sense?

      Anyway, that comment was three and a half years ago and this problem is a distant memory, at best.

      Reply
« Older Comments

Trackbacks

  1. Episode 119: Nietzsche on Tragedy and the Psychology of Art (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 6, 2015 at 8:07 am

    […] seen through their art. They were noble savages, but channeled their savagery in a way that formed what Nietzsche later called master morality. Whereas later, playwrights like Euripides lost touch with the chaotic side, really lost sight of […]

    Reply
  2. The Logos of Heraclitus - The Imaginative Conservative says:
    December 15, 2015 at 6:00 pm

    […] book has a section devoted to Heraclitus’s influence on philosophers like Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and Heidegger, and how parallels can be seen even in James Madison’s account of political […]

    Reply
  3. Rick Roderick on Nietzsche on Truth & Lie [full length] - DocumentaryBox says:
    June 6, 2016 at 12:33 am

    […] Episode 11: Nietzsche’s Immoralism: What Is Ethics, Anyway? […]

    Reply
  4. What Do Existentialists Think about Love? | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 28, 2016 at 10:43 pm

    […] walks us through the work of five existentialist thinkers: Stirner, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre, and […]

    Reply
  5. Nietzsche—Beyond Good & Evil – iasitasya says:
    November 15, 2018 at 4:26 am

    […] that human beings are feisty little critters, consistent with Nietzsche’s claim in the Genealogy that human beings naturally delight in cruelty (which is also meant to be a value-neutral […]

    Reply
  6. The Philosophy of Nietzsche: A Collection of Online Resources and Key Quotes – The Daily Idea says:
    September 9, 2019 at 4:02 am

    […] Nietzsche’s Immoralism: What Is Ethics, Anyway? […]

    Reply
  7. Slaves? – RAnt(hony)-ings says:
    October 14, 2019 at 4:29 am

    […] to the discussion of Nietzsche contained in Episode 11: Nietzsche’s Immoralism: What Is Ethics, Anyway? it’s easy to see the inspiration for much of Hitler and the Nazi party’s philosophy. […]

    Reply
  8. Week 11 (Apr 12-18), Part 2: Where do moral theories come from? – PHIL 101: Intro to Philosophy says:
    April 12, 2021 at 4:42 pm

    […] There’s a brilliant podcast episode by The Partially Examined Life that goes into Nietzsche&#8…, and particularly the Genealogy of Morals which we’re reading today. I won’t assign it because I think it does get a little messy and more in-depth than we need to for this class, but I’ve transcribed what I think are really important points when it comes to approaching Nietzsche (if you’ve noticed that I’m slightly late uploading this week’s “classes”… transcribing a podcast episode is why). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in