• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Philosophy & Kids Redux

September 4, 2010 by Seth Paskin 10 Comments

I'm not saying we are trendsetters.  I'm not saying the Philosophy Talk guys at Stanford are copycats.  I'm just saying that coincidentally, a mere month after I posted about whether children should be exposed to philosophy, they blogged about the same subject.

Hey, they're from Stanford.  Older, wiser, more well-read, respected, smarter, better funded, more articulate - probably morally superior.  But I was first.  Just sayin'.

--seth

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Web Detritus Tagged With: Philosophy and Children, Philosophy and the Young, Philosophy Talk, Stanford University

Comments

  1. Wes Alwan says

    September 4, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    This I find hilarious: ” Done wrongly, philosophy can be highly corrosive to one’s life. It can lead you to doubt everything. It can cause you wonder whether life has meaning, to question your religion, your country, your parents, and even your teachers. Do we really want to cast the young out onto the sea of philosophical doubt and uncertainty? Don’t we want to teach them to how to thrive and succeed in the world? To do that, they sometimes have to accommodate authority, not question it or reflexively rebel against it. “

    Reply
  2. burl says

    September 4, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    @Wes, your quote seems to answer Mark’s question from the Driscoll combox:

    “…Or am I missing the distinction here between philosophizing and preaching, where the latter is allowed to appeal to the audience’s emotions and call upon them only to reference doctrines already previously imparted so that they can reject new ideas such as pantheism as being repugnant to these preconceptions?”

    Reply
  3. Janette says

    September 5, 2010 at 1:14 am

    Philosophical doubt is doubting because there is reason to doubt – not an existential attitude – but an intellectual one.

    Reply
  4. Janette says

    September 5, 2010 at 1:16 am

    Seth- I have neem worlomg with children philosophically for nearly two decades – it’s nothing new! But, it is fantastic.

    Reply
  5. Wes Alwan says

    September 5, 2010 at 2:02 am

    @Burl — right, youth corruption!

    Reply
  6. Seth Paskin says

    September 5, 2010 at 9:00 am

    So Janette, what you’re saying is that you’ve been corrupting youth for 20 years? 🙂

    Seriously, sounds like you have a much sounder basis for making a comment on this than I or the Stanford guys – what’s your experience been with how children respond to philosophy?

    Reply
  7. Mark Linsenmayer says

    September 5, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the connection between religion and childhood: For me, at least, religion was hammered (though lightly) into my head at a young age, and philosophy was something I did as I matured, and was in fact a continuation of my interest in religion and a pretty quick escape from it.

    Consequently, I associate religion with childishness, and the media doesn’t help in this regard: the appeals of evangelical religion (see the recent Driscoll video I posted) don’t strike me as particularly aimed at adults, and the emphasis among evangelicals on keeping youngsters “on track” really keeps public religious discourse in this country at a very low level. But what’s the alternative? Go to adult Bible study groups where I feel like everyone I’m sitting with has long since been mind-fucked? Clearly, I need to just read some Grade A theologians if I want some pro-religion teachings that don’t insult my intellect.

    So, I find the inversion here interesting: kids should be taught to think philosophically from a young age, and as they mature and read more widely, that’s the time, I think, when we should all be introduced to the various religions, so as to be able to intelligently decide which, if any, of them seem plausible, useful, and satisfying.

    As a side note, I have less objection to cultural norms being imbued at a younger age (e.g. “I am an American.”), and I understand that some religious traditions are bound with these. Judaism, at least, seems at a point where kids can be brought up Jewish w/o necessarily having specific metaphysical beliefs thrust upon them at an age earlier than they’re capable of understanding them. I can’t say with certainty to what extent this has worked or is able to work with other tight connections like this (e.g. Latin American catholicism, Russian or Greek Orthodoxy… certainly it doesn’t set easily with American Protestantism, insofar as that’s even a cultural as opposed to a merely religious thing… in the South it is more, I guess.).

    Reply
  8. Geoff says

    September 5, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    A few personal reflections, prompted by Marks proposed reversal of the ‘cursus animi’.

    On Religion as childishness:
    The sunday school I attended as young fella was that of the Australian Uniting Church. It was pretty liberal, and I was never heavily indoctrinated. Sure, it took me a while to rid myself of the whole notion of hell – the only bit that caught my attention – but 1 hour a week of God vs many, many hours spent reading about sharks and dinosaurs and volcanoes and cool stuff? I don’t feel that my ‘churching’ really progressed past story-telling. Even as a young kid I was uneasy about it. The focus was keeping us entertained with old testament action blockbusters and really, all of the animals on one boat? What, he was in the whale for three days?

    On my introduction to Philosophy:
    This was via the television version of The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy. There was a brief section where the discourse between God & Oolon Coluphid results in the former disappearing. I wasn’t hooked on Philosophy, but I was pretty much enrolled in the atheist/agnostic camp from then on. At the tender age of 13 I had been introduced to philosophical doubt, and there was no looking back.

    More to come, time for work.

    Reply
  9. Seth Paskin says

    September 5, 2010 at 7:57 pm

    Calling someone out deserves being called out. Kyla from The Philosopher’s Zone let me know that they covered this subject 2 years ago. Here’s the link:

    http://www.abc.net.au/rn/philosopherszone/stories/2008/2435042.htm

    Go, download, now. And if you haven’t read my review of their program, you’re in for a treat:

    http://wp.me/pCXt2-lF

    or you can skip my ramblings and go straight to the source:

    http://www.abc.net.au/rn/philosopherszone/

    Reply
  10. Geoff says

    September 6, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    I am glad that work interuppted before I continued with my socially awkward self revelatory posting. All that I really wanted, and needed, to say, was that at a quite early stage in my education a little philosophical literacy would have been a significant advantage. It would have saved me a lot of wasted emotional energy.

    Any brief review of a news website that allows user comment would seem to suggest that the wider population would also benefit from some reflective philosophically directed exercises. But I am not really saying anything that isn’t obvious so I will stop.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to burl Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in