• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • (sub)Text
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Topic for #28: Nelson Goodman’s on Art and “Worldmaking”

October 7, 2010 by Mark Linsenmayer 5 Comments

Nelson Goodman was a recent (died in 1998) American philosopher who was active in the art community (owned a gallery for a while, was a notable patron). Though he was initially known for his neo-pragmatist (he co-wrote a book with Quine) works in epistemology, later in life he turned towards the philosophy of art, which he saw as a branch of epistemology, in that artworks, like scientific and philosophical theories, employ conceptual schemes and symbol systems and require interpretation to be understood.

We'll be discussing his book Ways of Worldmaking (1978), a collection of essays about the point of intersection between conceptions of artistic method and general theories of knowledge and language. What's the relationship between style and content? What makes a good rendering? How can one painting quote another? How does painting communicate apparent motion? I'm not sure at this point which chapters our discussion will focus on, but it's all interesting.

You can check out the table of contents and read the entire book online here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: General Announcements Tagged With: Nelson Goodman, philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. w says

    October 7, 2010 at 1:59 pm

    Interesting selection, look forward to paging through as well as listening to what you guys have to say. Other than various citations here and there my only taste of Goodman was in Boghossian’s (*excellent*) Fear of Knowledge, which struck me as a knock-down rebuttal. Or at least as close as you get in this game.

    Reply
  2. Wes Alwan says

    October 7, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Hi w — I read Fear of Knowledge some time ago and thought it was excellent as well; we’ll review what he has to say about Goodman before the podcast.

    Reply
  3. Mark Linsenmayer says

    October 11, 2010 at 1:00 pm

    Just reading the intro of the Boghossian, it doesn’t seem relevant. Goodman is not a relativist about matters of fact and is not going to say that unwarranted denials of well-established science are in any sense “equally valid” to what they are objecting to.

    I think we’ll be concentrating more on the aesthetic stuff in there regardless, but we’ll see. We’ll do Rorty eventually, which Bodhossian is explicitly aimed at.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      October 17, 2010 at 4:35 pm

      On further reading of both Goodman and Boghossian, it’s more complicated than I made it seem. So far, it looks like B. doesn’t capture G’s point well enough to dispute it, and G’s stance is different enough from Rorty’s that the detail that B. goes into about Rorty doesn’t totally apply to Goodman, and even re. Rorty, it doesn’t seem to me that B. really gets it. Anyway, the B. is a good read and puts some things into focus, though I’m hoping our Goodman discussion focuses less on issues related to the pragmatist theory of truth and more on aesthetics. It’s happening this evening, so we’ll see.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Newspapers Don't Know How to Write About Philosophy | The Partially Examined Life | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    October 22, 2010 at 9:04 am

    […] Nelson Goodman gives a more complicated analysis of this to say that fictional entities are established by linguistic convention, so that we shouldn’t say that all claims about unicorns are false; in fact, it’s clear that “unicorns have horns” is true while “unicorns have chipmunk teeth” is false despite the fiction involved. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • dmf on Ep. 293: Donna Haraway on Feminist Science (Part One)
  • PvI#31: Signs, Signs, Ubiquitous Signs w/ Brooke Breit on Ep. 290: Susanne Langer on Our Symbol-Making Nature (Part One)
  • Seth Paskin on Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part One for Supporters)
  • Eli Eichner on Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part One for Supporters)
  • Conner Fields on Ep. 292: Langer on Symbolic Music (Part One)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in