• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • (sub)Text
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

The Tedium Debates: Dawkins vs. the Pope

October 12, 2010 by Mark Linsenmayer 5 Comments

Dawkins and PopeHow philosophically uninteresting are the atheist debates?

Yes, it's nice that something akin to philosophy is actively debated in the media, that ongoing disputes about religious matters will hopefully keep the spirit of the times moving forward by providing active intellectual and/or spiritual alternatives to people beyond whatever religion they may have been brought up with.

But as a veteran now of Dawkins's book The God Delusion, I can say that it's about 15% actual philosophical argumentation and 85% tedious debunking of poor arguments foisted by and/or upon the general public.

In this 9/17 USA Today article, we see Dawkins "incandescent with rage" (and even though that phrase is a self-description from Dawkins, I'm still going to sneer at the media for always emphasizing how supposedly raving these generally calm atheists are supposed to be) at the Pope for equivocating atheism with Nazis, or (says the article) maybe Dawkins misinterpreted the Pope, so we'd better go look up the Pope's actual speech to confirm but... wait... who the hell cares?

Dawkins's point is correct, of course: immoral behavior is not a logical consequent of being an atheist, and the fact that it is necessary to point this out in the face of repeated claims to the contrary, with Nazis being given as a tedious example makes one... well... tired, maybe? In need of Buddhist detachment from the slanders and squabbles of the world? But I do not envy Dawkins his role as intellectual policeman and defender against such things, or... wait... you mean I could be like Sam Harris and go on TV shows and have lots and lots of fame and cash that more traditionally scholarly philosophers don't have? Sign me up, I guess!

Just to clear this up in advance: Not only does it not matter what Hitler believed, it also doesn't matter what Stalin believed, or Albert Einstein, or Thomas Jefferson, or that pleasant-looking person on TV, or the mass of the civilized world throughout history. None of this would be a particularly good argument for the fact that you should believe, and the tedium of this current paragraph has now infected me with a sticky film of self-loathing. Thanks, Mr. Dawkins and Mr. Pope, keep up that whole talky talky thing you've got going on, and please go give us a good rating on iTunes!

-Mark Linsenmayer

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings, Web Detritus Tagged With: atheism, philosophy blog, philosophy podcast, Richard Dawkins

Comments

  1. Daniel Horne says

    October 12, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    Score a point to Dawkins, though, for reminding us that it might be more logical for one to associate, y’know, Hitler Youthism with Nazis. It might also have been worth mentioning the “Gott mit uns” inscription on the belt buckles worn by WWII-era Wehrmacht. I’m sure the Hitch would not have let such an opportunity slip by.

    … and sure enough!

    http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/09/christopher-hitchens-still-doesnt-believe-in-the-afterlife.html

    Google, I love you!

    Reply
  2. Jonathan says

    October 13, 2010 at 4:39 am

    http://orientem.blogspot.com/2010/10/ortega-y-gasset-on-mediocrity-of.html
    ‘As a result of his own intellectual self-satisfaction, the scientist asserts his opinions over the whole range of human endeavor, with absolutely catastrophic consequences’

    Reply
  3. Mark Linsenmayer says

    October 13, 2010 at 9:18 am

    @Jonathan: I know it’s not exactly fair to respond to your comment, which comes on my screen in 9 pt font or something, with a new blog post, which is in bold and maybe 16 pt font, but I did credit and link back to you. 🙂

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Who's Qualified to Speak about Religion? | The Partially Examined Life | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    October 13, 2010 at 9:15 am

    […] most recent comment to yesterday’s post on atheism was a quote (thanks, Jonathan!) from Jose Ortega y Gasset used on this blog to argue […]

    Reply
  2. Elucidations Podcast: Brian Leiter on Religious Tolerance | The Partially Examined Life | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    October 14, 2010 at 8:39 am

    […] if the atheism debates are so squalid, then what’s the moderate, “philosophically respectable” approach to some of the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Chris Hall on And now for something completely serious
  • dmf on Ep. 293: Donna Haraway on Feminist Science (Part One)
  • PvI#31: Signs, Signs, Ubiquitous Signs w/ Brooke Breit on Ep. 290: Susanne Langer on Our Symbol-Making Nature (Part One)
  • Seth Paskin on Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part One for Supporters)
  • Eli Eichner on Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part One for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy ·Â Terms of Use ·Â Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in