Passing on this bit of loveliness. Thanks to Paul, who posted this to our Facebook group.
-Mark Linsenmayer
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast
A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog
About The Partially Examined Life
The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion
Become a PEL Citizen!
As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.
Blog Post Categories
- (sub)Text
- Aftershow
- Announcements
- Audiobook
- Book Excerpts
- Citizen Content
- Citizen Document
- Citizen News
- Close Reading
- Combat and Classics
- Constellary Tales
- Exclude from Newsletter
- Featured Article
- General Announcements
- Interview
- Letter to the Editor
- Misc. Philosophical Musings
- Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
- Nakedly Self-Examined Music
- NEM Bonus
- Not School Recording
- Not School Report
- Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
- PEL Music
- PEL Nightcap
- PEL's Notes
- Personal Philosophies
- Phi Fic Podcast
- Philosophy vs. Improv
- Podcast Episode (Citizen)
- Podcast Episodes
- Pretty Much Pop
- Reviewage
- Song Self-Exam
- Things to Watch
- Vintage Episode (Citizen)
- Web Detritus
Made my day!
Hilarious.
“Nothingness, I embrace youuuuu!”
True genius. There are times I actually like the internet.
Very fun!
Related to Stars and the nature of existence, I think:
Can any PEL listeners/commenters say what gravity is? Forget about who or what God is for a while…what is the physical nature of interaction of things in the universe?
Burl: I was watching a youtube video on the Holographic Universe idea today that spoke to this question. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHgi6E1ECgo
Thanks, Douglas, it was interesting, as were the two lectures by Prof Peebles on cosmology that were Youtube follow-ups.
I was reading some NASA astrophysicists’ FAQs, where they said gravity is still not understood. News to me was that mass slows time, so equal clocks, one by a black hole and another in ’empty’ space will run different. Listening to the physicists, I am concerned with how math takes a front seat to physical nature (misplaced concreteness given to abstractions). If time is change (or even if it is a dimension of nature), how can mass have causal effect on it?
The alternative to the fallacy of making abstractions the reality may be of interest. The rumors that Whitehead’s theory of gravity and relativity (which is an extension of Newton’s, w. no curved spacetime) has been disproven are not well-founded. It seems the physicists are no kinder to him than his philosophy buddies, like Bertie Russell.
http://www.andrewhyman.com/articles/whitehead.pdf
That sucked quite well. Appropriate there was no footage of Han Solo saving Luke or of victory.