• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Paul Tillich on Religious Existentialism

July 3, 2011 by Mark Linsenmayer 11 Comments

A name commonly thrown around when discussion liberal Christianity is Paul Tillich, famed for a Christian version of something like Heidegger's philosophy of religion. Here's a very long and slow-to-get-going (not to mention very dark on my screen) interview with him:

Watch on youtube.

In this first clip (around 5 minutes in), he describes how tragedy shaped his philosophy (interestingly, he seems to equate "idealism" as having a positive, optimistic outlook with the metaphysical idealism of Hegel, Fichte, etc.). Around 8 minutes in, he compares philosophizing in German vs. English (with a pretty positive assessment of English as better enabling analytic clarity).

In the 2nd clip, he talks a bit about Christian socialism in Germany. Around 3:45 in, he discusses his influences, citing not only German idealism but Heraclitus and Parmenides as being key. His biggest influence was Schelling, whom he credits as anticipating modern existentialism. He also, surprisingly, cites Hamlet as providing an early model of existentialism for him.

In the 3rd clip, he gets into the relationship between Christianity and the various existentialist figures (Sartre, Nietzsche). He says that Christianity can make use of the results of any tradition and not essentially tied to any of them (which is hard for me to understand unless his views are something like Schleiermacher's)

It's not until clip 4 when Tillich gets around to talking about what he thinks the religion and philosophy is: both are about addressing the question of the meaning of "my life and life generally." Around 1:40 he starts talking about the notion of "spirit," which sounds straight from Hegel, and he describes morality as "the realization of oneself as a person," not following preexisting external moral laws (which he calls "moralism," not morality). Following laws "instead of considering them as expressions of what we human beings essentially are and thus should be" is distortion of morality. We invent morality; it is an expression of us. This sounds much more like Nietzsche than Kant, and sure enough, the interviewers ask Tillich what keeps us in line if we're not following rules. Tillich's response is "love," which is very much in the spirit of Schleiermacher even if S. explicitly buys into Kantian ethics. Inverting Kant, Tillich says that even the strictest obedience to moral law doesn't count as truly moral behavior if it doesn't come out of love as a reaction to a concrete situation (meaning that the right way to respond can't be captured in rules, which can't capture all the specific possible situations). Rules like those elaborated in the Sermon on the Mount should be taken as expressing the wisdom of human experience: we should take them as good advice that needs to be absorbed and used to feed our own free moral expressions.

All in all, this is a pretty interesting if slow-moving interview (it assumes you already know who Tillich is and have a reason to care about what he haw to say), though unfortunately it displays no philosophical acumen on the part of the questioners (unlike, say, those much more pleasant Bryan McGee interviews).

-Mark Linsenmayer

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Things to Watch Tagged With: Paul Tillich, philosophy blog, philosophy of religion

Comments

  1. Kid Charlemagne says

    July 4, 2011 at 12:12 am

    Nice to see Tillich up here. He’s certainly an interesting figure both for his private life and for his impact on liberal theology.

    Reply
  2. burl says

    July 4, 2011 at 5:34 am

    I am open to PT, but was quite put off upon hearing his anthropocentric dogma that ‘Spirit; is given only for humans. ALL creatures have Ultimate Concern.

    If I am looking for a liberal theology, it needs to be inclusive of all realities. In such a case, I would choose the other PT liberal theological approach – Process Theology.

    Like my dogs, I am agnostic.

    Reply
    • Kenn says

      December 5, 2015 at 8:59 am

      Your dogs are not agnostic. You are their God.

      Reply
  3. burl says

    July 5, 2011 at 8:39 am

    I was jusy looking at an RV forum thread where a seller could not convince anyone that her clean, low-mileage, fairly priced unit was legitimate. Peole would either lowball an offer, or just say ‘that’s a fine rig’ and leave.

    Buyers are so accustomed to flashy sales pitches from undisciplined who make up any imaginable story to get their commission. In a way, the business of theology is like this. The product is quite valuable, it’s the nature of its marketers that often turns the more thoughtful individual away.

    Given the breadth of the subject matter that theology can co-opt/include (nearly all fields of study), and the fact that so many theologies spring forth from such endeavor, is it any wonder that one might make a living deploring such a state.

    From the wiki link, Tillich said ‘theological theism:

    “deprives me of my subjectivity because [God] is all-powerful and all-knowing. I revolt and make him into an object, but the revolt fails and becomes desperate. God appears as the invincible tyrant, the being in contrast with whom all other beings are without freedom and subjectivity. He is equated with the recent tyrants who with the help of terror try to transform everything into a mere object, a thing among things, a cog in a machine they control. He becomes the model of everything against which Existentialism revolted. This is the God Nietzsche said had to be killed because nobody can tolerate being made into a mere object of absolute knowledge and absolute control. This is the deepest root of atheism. It is an atheism which is justified as the reaction against theological theism and its disturbing implications.”

    I bet Dawkins and the New Atheists would agree.

    Reply
  4. burl says

    July 5, 2011 at 8:43 am

    I meant to add that both the seller (Tillich), and potential but unwilling buyers both can make a living off of theology.

    Reply
  5. burl says

    July 5, 2011 at 8:52 am

    Actually, I meant to say this (weak coffee):

    Both the seller (Tillich), and potential but unwilling buyers (New Atheists) can make a living off of dissing-theology.

    Reply
  6. Kid Charlemagne says

    July 5, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    I loved the dramatic introduction like those old cheesy Mystery Science Theatre movies. I was fully expecting a low budget alien invasion movie to follow.

    Tillich is making a bit a comeback these days in liberal theology especially for taking the God debate beyond atheism/theism.

    Mark, have you seen this piece on him?
    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,908007-1,00.html

    Reply
  7. burl says

    July 5, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    On first googling this just after my first comment http://processandfaith.org/writings/ask-dr-cobb/2008-07/tillich-and-whitehead , I told myself not to link it here as it seems all I can do is blab on ANW.

    But it is from Dr Cobb at Cleremont Theological, and it is more Quality-filled an act to link it than to fear further digging myself in as a process freak. Cobb is a lifelong, long-lived Whiteheadian, and an honorable, compelling theologian.

    His statements on Thomistic esse and Heidegger are useful for theophilosophy. If it peaks your curiosity, read all the Existential Thomism you can, particularly the ANW sympathetic, Jacques Maritain and Fr. W Norris Clarke, SJ.

    For a special treat, search out Fr. Gerald Phelan’s blockbusting insight of essence as an exercise of esse

    Reply
  8. Karl Miller says

    May 30, 2013 at 4:15 pm

    Hey all,

    Another request to add to the pile … why not do an episode on Hamlet? He comes up so often in every other corner of your growing archive and you’ve devoted whole episodes to Cormac McCarthy books, so … I’d be interested to hear everyone’s take. That is all. Carry on.

    cheers,
    K

    Reply
  9. m.amin.komijani@gmail.com says

    April 15, 2021 at 5:05 am

    Alas, the video links are private. 🙁

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Tillich: A Moralism of Justice vs. a Morality of Love | 'Til human voices wake us says:
    June 6, 2017 at 9:31 am

    […] versus “morality,” terms that he distinguishes in the following manner. A moralism is an externally imposed law that a person can submit themselves to without necessarily making their own or without believing in […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in