• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Dreyfus on Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Artificial Intelligence

December 19, 2011 by Brad Younger 8 Comments

[Brad is a frequent contributor to our Facebook page, so we invited him to post on the blog - welcome him!]

I found this to be an interesting video which relates to both the Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty episodes. In the video, Hubert Dreyfus discusses Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and the philosophical implications for artificial intelligence. Dreyfus has long been a critic of AI and has often cited Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty as offering important phenomenological insights into AI’s philosophical underpinnings.

Dreyfus discusses how human expertise depends primarily on practical coping skills and a basic engagement with the world, not on some internalization of rules. I think he’s spot on. Practical knowledge, as more fundamental than that of the theoretical, need not even rise to the level of consciousness.

Merleau-Ponty is mentioned as being significant for calling out that the body plays an essential role for our being-in-the-world. Whereas the philosophical tradition has always taken the body to be something which gets in the way of reason and the intellect, Merleau-Ponty takes it to be crucial. Dreyfus goes on to talk about his book, the internet, and how the past failures of AI were based on mistaken philosophical presuppositions.  [The video is in two parts, if you don't get a youtube link at the end to part II, you can find it here.]

-Brad Younger

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: PEL's Notes, Web Detritus Tagged With: artificial intelligence, heidegger, Hubert Dreyfus, Merleau-Ponty, philosophy blog

Comments

  1. Daniel McKay says

    December 19, 2011 at 11:54 pm

    Thanks, poopy pants.

    Reply
  2. dmf says

    December 21, 2011 at 10:29 am

    http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~hdreyfus/html/papers.html
    some of Bert’s related papers (including thoughts on Foucault) his APA address is quite good

    Reply
  3. Andrew C says

    December 22, 2011 at 6:45 pm

    This is the abstract from Rodney Brooks’ 1987 paper “Planning is a way of avoiding figuring out what to do next”

    “The idea of planning and plan execution is just an intuition-based decomposition. There is no reason it has to be that way. Most likely in the long term, real empirical evidence for our system’s we know to be built that way (from designing them like that) will determine whether its a very good idea or not . Any particular planner is simply an abstraction barrier. Below that level we get a choice of whether to slot in another planner or to place a program which does the right thing . Why stop there? Maybe we can go up the hierarchy and eliminate the planners there too. To do this we must move from a state based way of reasoning to a process based way of acting.”

    I think Brooks’ subsumption architecture is conceptually very Heideggerian. And it fits (time-wise) with the failure of the early strong AI at MIT.

    You may also recall this interesting paper (it got picked up in Ars, Wired, a few blogs) comparing the E.Coli function architecture with the Linux kernel (http://www.pnas.org/content/107/20/9186.full). The key diagram here shows an interpretation of the function networks of the dna of E. Coli and the functions in the Linux kernel. Both can be seen here as ‘process-based ways of acting’, without any internal model.

    I heard a joke this week – if science is a hunt for a missing coin at night, physicists are looking under the street light, reasoning that they can actually see what they’re doing. Other science is looking out in the dark, where the coin is much more likely to be, but impossible to find. I suspect the Brooksian thing may be like working outside the lamplight. Building complex AI systems up from non-reasoning behaviour into more and more recognizably rational action is probably the right way to get to intelligence, but that doesn’t mean its not impossible.

    Reply
  4. Andrew C says

    December 22, 2011 at 6:49 pm

    I can’t do html – I assumed I could. The italics were supposed to stop after ‘does the right thing’. Also, here’s the link to the whole Brooks paper – there’s a reasonable treatment of these subjects in wikipedia, which is how I first got onto this. http://people.csail.mit.edu/brooks/papers/Planning%20is%20Just.pdf

    Reply
  5. Andrew C says

    December 22, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    Reply
  6. Brad Younger says

    December 23, 2011 at 1:58 pm

    Thanks Andrew! That sounds pretty interesting. I’ll definitely have to check out Brooks’ book.

    Reply
  7. Jackson Buddingh says

    December 27, 2011 at 2:31 pm

    what a great little talk. thanks for sharing!

    Reply
  8. parrhesiastes says

    January 12, 2012 at 4:34 am

    FWIW, Dreyfus’ full talk is available UC Berkley youtube channel

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in