• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

In Memoriam: Michael Dummett

January 5, 2012 by Brad Younger 3 Comments

Dummett in 2004

Last week, on December 27th, Michael Dummett passed away. Dummett was an important and influential British philosophy of the 20th century, probably most famous for his interpretations of Frege. Indeed it was his early work which helped to revitalize an interest in Frege's work in the second half of the 20th century. (The PEL episode on Frege can be found here.  An interview of Dummett talking about Frege on Philosophy Bites can be found here.)

Dummett was also important for his work in the philosophy of mathematics, logic, language, and metaphysics. His most original work involved the suggestion that we understand disputes in metaphysics over realism as disputes in logic. This turns on the principle of bivalence (the semantic principle which says that every statement is either true or false). Insofar as realists think that entities are mind-independent, they will accept bivalence. Truth is conceived as transcending our abilities to know. Anti-realists on the other hand don't accept bivalence since they think that the entities in question are mind-dependent. They take truth to be epistemologically constrained.

There are unfortunately not a lot of videos of Dummett on the web, but if you want to join the Bodleian Philosophy Faculty Library, you can get a long interview of Dummett by Donald Davidson here.  Dummett was undoubtedly a significant philosopher of the 20th century. And he will surely be remembered for many years to come.

-Brad Younger

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: General Announcements, Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: Anti-realism, Gottlob Frege, Michael Dummett, philosophy blog

Comments

  1. Daniel McKay says

    January 5, 2012 at 12:47 pm

    Is there a source which can explain the concepts mentioned here in coloring book form? I’m intrigued by the notion of truth transcending our abilities to know, and conversely it’s opposite.

    Reply
  2. Brad Younger says

    January 6, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    Hey Daniel! I’ve been trying to find a good source which isn’t too technical, but I must admit that I’ve been having trouble finding anything. I’ll keep looking around but I think in the meantime a good place to start is the Standford encyclopedia of philosophy. There is a section called “realism and anti-realism” on the topic of truth which deals with these issues. You can find that here: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth/#ReaAntRea

    As for Dummett’s characterization of realism and anti-realism, the way that it should be thought about is not in complete general terms, but rather as relative to the specific domain in question. For example, just because one is a realist about science, that doesn’t mean one has to thereby be a realist about mathematical objects (Platonism). That would be far too simplified.

    Personally, I’m a realist about the past and the future. That is, I think that the past and future are just as real as the present. Compare this to the anti-realist about the past and the future (a view called presentism). Whereas the realist thinks that truths about the past and future are true regardless of whether there’s any evidence or whether we are capable of knowing such truths (since statements about the past and future are statements about real mind-independent entities). The anti-realist denies this. Insofar as the anti-realist thinks that the past and future don’t exist and are thus not ontologically real, truths about such will be a function of what evidence we have or what we are capable of knowing. So while the realist would accept the principle of bivalence in regards to statements about the past and future, the anti-realist wouldn’t. So this turns on whether statements about the future are true now. The anti-realist thinks that there is no fact of the matter because the future has yet to exist. While the realist thinks that every statement about the future has a determinate truth-value (true or false) since the future is real and in some sense already “out there”.

    But anyways, I’ll keep looking around to see whether I can find any other sources which are not too technical. I’ll let you know!

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Two Short Philosophical Videos on the EU Referendum | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    June 27, 2016 at 10:03 am

    […] from leading universities their take on the EU referendum arguments. Drawing on the work of Michael Dummett and his views on governments as the moral representatives of citizens, Dr. Alexander Douglas […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Wes Alwan on Ep. 306: Dworkin and the Dobbs Decision (Part Three for Supporters)
  • Wes Alwan on Ep. 306: Dworkin and the Dobbs Decision (Part Three for Supporters)
  • Evan Hadkins on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in