• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

There’s a Madness in Pirsig’s Method

February 7, 2012 by David Buchanan 5 Comments

Split Personality[Editor's Note: Here's the first full-on blog post by our Pirsig guest Dave Buchanan, though he's been a long-time, productive commenter to our posts here. Oh, and this image is by Allison Moore, snatched from here.]

L'esprit de l'escalier or "staircase wit" is a name for the clever reply that comes too late, for the witty comeback that comes to you only after you've left the party. As we were wrapping up the conversation Seth expressed some frustration about the complexity of the narrative. Pirsig's story is a strange kind of autobiography in which he splits himself in two and the tale of Phaedrus' quest is told only from the narrator's perspective, from a somewhat hostile and unreliable point of view. Why complicate it this way? Why not just say it? Why be so tricky? I thought it might help to walk up and down the stairs but no clever or witty answer has arrived, and now I just have leg cramps.

One could make a case that this divided self is meant to express the problem of alienation, the problem of being alienated from one's self. It also supports the larger ghost story, adds dramatic tension, etc., but splitting himself in two was also the solution to a very basic writing problem. At one point Pirsig looked his unfinished manuscript and was disturbed by the number of times he'd used the pronoun "I". It was tedious, annoying, and just plain bad. Splitting himself in two solved that little pronoun problem.

My favorite answer is a bit speculative. I think Pirsig uses the relatively cautious narrator to soften the blow, to ease the reader's way. Phaedrus' claims are likely to shock to the common sense reader. The narrator's warnings against his frightening madness are likely to strike the reader as entirely plausible. It's easy to believe that Phaedrus went too far, that he slipped over the edge into the "terra incognita of the insane".

When the unreliability of the narrator is realized, however, an ironic reversal of meaning occurs and the slandered villain suddenly becomes the hero. From Phaedrus' point of view, the narrator is a coward who refuses to go far enough. Unlike Phaedrus, he is motivated by the desire to appear normal, to avoid any return visits to the psychiatric hospital. The narrator's preference for social acceptance over the truth, as Phaedrus sees it, is a sad case of selling out. Some of his claims might seem to defy common sense but, he says, weirdness is not the test of truth or falsity.

"I spook very easily these days, and am not ashamed to admit it. He never spooked at anything. Never. That's the difference between us. That's why I'm alive and he's not."

-Dave Buchanan

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: philosophy blog, Robert Pirsig

Comments

  1. dmf says

    February 7, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    http://www.deathoftheauthor.com/

    Reply
  2. Bruce Adam says

    February 7, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    Can I just suggest that the unreliable narrator has a credibility that gives Pirsig’s story an authenticity which the usual all-knowing narrator of novels or the objective voice of non-fiction could never achieve.
    It reads like a first hand account , by a survivor , rather than the ghost-written book , the movie version or the findings of the inquiry, which also report unusual events.

    Reply
    • David Buchanan says

      February 7, 2012 at 3:47 pm

      Right, I think it was Mark who quoted Pirsig on this point. If I may paraphrase: Essays always sound like God talking for eternity but it’s really only ever some particular person talking from a particular time and place. The book’s substance is not contradicted by author’s the performance. He wants to show and tell the reader that objectivity is a myth and perspective is entirely unavoidable.

      “To understand what he was trying to do it’s necessary to see that part of the landscape, inseparable from it, which must be understood, is a figure in the middle of it, sorting sand into piles. To see the landscape without seeing this figure is not to see the landscape at all. To reject that part of the Buddha that attends to the analysis of motorcycles is to miss the Buddha entirely.”

      Reply
      • Bruce Adam says

        February 8, 2012 at 2:57 pm

        Thanks again , David. I appreciate your comments. Everything you’ve brought to this discussion ,so far, has added to my understanding.

        Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Persig leeg | Algebratesting says:
    August 4, 2012 at 5:31 am

    […] There’s a Madness in Pirsig’s Method | The Partially Examined Life …Feb 7, 2012 … [Editor’s Note: Here’s the first full-on blog post by our Pirsig guest Dave … no clever or witty answer has arrived, and now I just have leg cramps. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in