• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Rick Roderick on Derrida

March 4, 2012 by Daniel Horne 6 Comments

Watch on YouTube

For anyone still trying to sort Derrida out, here's a hopefully helpful attempt at explication from Rick Roderick. I liked Roderick's approach in directly opposing Derrida's theory to the "Theory of Reference." This is an allusion to Gottlob Frege, who was discussed in an earlier PEL episode.

I found it impossible to follow Roderick's argument toward the end of the lecture, until I tracked down the Derrida essay to which he was referring, White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy. (After you open the online PDF file, do an on-screen text search for "The breath is seated," and you'll find the relevant passage.)

-Daniel Horne

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Things to Watch Tagged With: Gottlob Frege, Jacques Derrida, philosophy blog, philosophy of language, postmodernism

Comments

  1. dmf says

    March 5, 2012 at 8:37 am

    a bit of background/bio info in relation to his work on violence/oppression:
    http://www.historiesofviolence.com/theory/derrida/

    Reply
  2. dmf says

    March 5, 2012 at 9:43 am

    this is a good lecture to the degree that it makes some vital themes like the inability to fix meanings available to the audience but it won’t likely help anyone to read Derrida (a task probably well beyond lecturing) for themselves.
    He does a good job with what Derrida takes away but misses what Derrida champions like Justice,Hospitality, etc, and this gets to the point of do words/concepts gain their meaning from use (roughly Rorty’s position) and so we are at the end of Philosophy, or do concepts have some kind of autonomous/quasi-transcendental aspect (even if only as traces/spectres) that makes Philosophy something more than a study of uses/human-doings?

    Reply
  3. David Buchanan says

    March 5, 2012 at 12:11 pm

    Roderick’s lecture gave me the same impression as the reading (Structure, Sign and Play). How do we think about language after the end of metaphysics? After 25 centuries of failure, there is a shift away from the metaphysics of “presence”. Where Derrida says, “the whole history of the concept of structure, before the rupture I spoke of, must be thought of as a series of substitutions of center for center,” Roderick will say that throughout this history we’ve been trying to fill in the blank in a sentence that reads, “Being is _________”. The history of metaphysics, Derrida says, is the history of metaphors for this center. The names related to these centers have always designated the constant of a presence, he says, and lists examples like essence, existence, substance, subject, truth, consciousness, God, man, and so forth. None of these ultimate truths have ever been found and Derrida wants to show how this relates to the work that language can and cannot do. As Roderick points out, this is not a theory of language, per se, because that’s going to be yet another metaphysical center. So he merely has a “take” on language. No fixed meanings, no correspondence to the referents, no final reading, etc.. And this is where his critics start howling about relativism.

    I wonder if, in French, the phrase “White mythology” contains some kind of pun or double meaning so that it also means “Blank mythology”.

    Reply
    • Daniel Horne says

      March 5, 2012 at 2:20 pm

      Hi David,

      Agreed with your last sentence. I think Roderick misinterprets Derrida to make a caricature “cultural studies” argument that Derrida meant by “White Mythology” nothing more than “Western philosophy has to date been of, by, and for Caucasian people.”

      I can even see how one might see how that “cultural studies” argument might entail. (Say, perhaps, that metaphysics’ flight to abstraction glosses over legacies and assumptions that are inherent to the European cultural tradition.)

      But I don’t think Derrida was being so crass as that, and I do know that Derrida enjoyed using “blanc” as a pun on “blank” — that is, he was concerned for spaces and “blanks” in text as much as content and signs:

      http://books.google.com/books?id=EBmZrXKmARQC&lpg=PA64&ots=cPDLdtSK2Y&dq=white%20blanc%20mythology%20derrida&pg=PA64#v=onepage&q=white%20blanc%20mythology%20derrida&f=false

      Reply
      • David Buchanan says

        March 5, 2012 at 9:48 pm

        Thanks, Daniel. Maybe this is a bit too fanciful – but I’m thinking of those strange locutions where Derrida talks about each of the various “centers” in the history of the metaphysics as “the presence that isn’t present” and they way he talks about the way abstractions depend on the absence of the referent. I mean, his deconstruction of this history suggests that “White Mythology” is much better understood or translated as “Blank Mythology” rather than “Caucasian Mythology”. I think he’s saying that each of the metaphysical posits throughout Western history are always some kind of abstraction, for which there is no referent as such. It’s always absent from the concrete because it’s a generalization about a class or category of the concrete. So the center is always posited as the “real” reality behind appearances. So it’s absent. It’s never known in experience, except as an abstract conception. Blank Mythology.

        Having said that, however, I also get the impression that “White Mythology” is white in the sense of being sterile or pure. I know, whiteness and purity in the same sentence – it sounds a little creepy – but I just mean that that same sort of blankness again. At the top of his lecture, Roderick says that Derrida is conducting a Freudian-like project wherein he’s looking for the slips of the tongue in philosophy. He’s looking to see what’s been hidden, left out and marginalized in the construction of our philosophies. And the central myth, if you will, that guides this project is the idea that it’s not a myth, that it’s not built just for the Westerners but rather universal and objectively true or really real or some such conceit. And I guess it would be fair to say that “White Mythology” was just caucasian too in the sense that other mythologies were marginalized or even demonized – as a feature of the pretense to global truth.

        Reply
  4. Randall Miron says

    July 22, 2013 at 5:16 pm

    David, I like your case for reading it as “blank” mythology.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in