• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Closereads
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Closereads
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Racism Among Historic Philosophers

March 30, 2012 by Mark Linsenmayer 10 Comments

As mentioned on the race episode, I thumbed through a book edited by Andrew Valls called Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy,which includes essays on Descartes, Hobbes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Mill, Marx, and Nietzsche. To give Valls's words on the last of these, since I mentioned it in the discussion:

...James Winchester examines Nietzsche's views on race. Against those who charged that Nietzsche was a racist, Winchester shows that his relation to race is far too complex to be captured by this label. Although Nietzsche made some disturbing remarks on this score, he also departed from conventional racial thinking of his day by claiming, for example, that Jes constituted a strong race and Germans a mixed and weak one. These views, among others, do show that Nietzsche was a racialist--he believed that races were real and had great causal significance in shaping thought and culture. This view, combined with his assessment of the German and Jewish races, led Nietzsche to recommend "mixing" of the two in order to strengthen the German race. While Nietzsche sometimes thought in racial terms, his use of racial ideas was neither consistent nor well worked out."

Knowing that Nietzsche didn't have his shit together on this topic despite talking about it so much doesn't make me feel much better about him in this respect, but then again, I was already looking past the many unforgivable things he said about women, so the race issue doesn't require any further stretching of the brain on my part.

-Mark Linsenmayer

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Web Detritus Tagged With: Andrew Valls, Friedrich Nietzsche, philosophy blog, Race, sexism

Comments

  1. dmf says

    March 30, 2012 at 10:10 am

    this reminds me of conversations about how much the biography of philosophers should be read into, and or against, their writings/teachings, and for me there isn’t so much a general rule except to say that this should be demonstrated to be relevant or not as opposed to merely asserted.
    For a living philosopher working on race folks may be interested in:
    http://www.newappsblog.com/2012/03/multi-scale-political-affect-securitization-and-racial-anxiety.html

    Reply
  2. jay twitty says

    March 31, 2012 at 9:09 am

    Nietzsche didn’t much care for people in general did he? Didn’t like Germans. Nietzsche didn’t have his proverbial shit together on the class issue either. Actually, Nietzsche was a sick dick.

    Reply
    • Samuel Heathington says

      December 17, 2020 at 3:11 am

      That’s what I said. Just a dick.

      I don’t understand why he gets so much praise for being an intellectual, much less a philosopher. I guess they didn’t have much to choose from, at that time.

      I’m so glad I lived in the time of people like George Carlin, Patrice O’Neal, Ken Kesey, Eckhart Tolle and U. G. Krishnamurti.

      Reply
  3. Bernardo Alonso Alonso says

    June 23, 2012 at 6:04 am

    Nietzsche was super racist. Hundreds and hundreds of Nietzsche’s original phrases reveal an explicit biological, social and personal criminal racist (inhuman, misoginist, sure!). These texts are usualy hidden or manipulate by ideologists. I give some texts now only in german and spanish, with citations under google search: “Nietzsche Rassist”

    Reply
  4. mattias says

    March 11, 2017 at 6:46 pm

    what the hell…4-chan level of analysis of Nietzsche, got it completey wrong. I wish he were still around to deliver one of his gorgeously snarky rejections of bad thinking.

    Reply
  5. James says

    March 31, 2017 at 7:45 pm

    There are many examples of his racism and misogyny (like most European men at that time). Yes, he said some amazing things that have changed many lives, but it would be foolish to not consider his bias when reading his work. I always roll my eyes at people who replace Jesus with Nietzsche and quote him as some perfect all-knowing being. It is interesting how Christian practices show up even after people have left the fold.

    Reply
    • Ryan Parker says

      June 29, 2019 at 2:14 pm

      Show examples of where he’s “racist” and “misogynistic” and explain explain how it shows his personal problems with the groups he’s “targeting”.

      Reply
  6. omar says

    May 25, 2019 at 11:35 pm

    In defense of Nietzsche

    Taking anyone’s work out context to serve your own purposes is often the trait of poor orators and writers when I need of “cred”. Nietzsche can’t be a racist in essence because racism or any ism for that fact is the in inescapable return of the same, the will to power and in short nihilism. Nietzsche defines nihilism as the “devaluation of the highest value”. His work is to serve hyperbolic critique that demands us to transcend our “humanity”. Nietzsche asks us to look at ourselves and to realize that we as a species have a problem with the herd mentality that we are eager to follow and we are often to eager to accept our condition, station and normative assumptions in life.
    To understand him better…read Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist a book by Walter Kaufmann

    Nietzsche was an anti-humanist struggling with his internal anguish and his own inability to transcend nihilism.

    Reply
    • Ryan Parker says

      June 29, 2019 at 2:11 pm

      Only observant comment I’ve read. Anti humanist though? I think he was so deeply in touch with humanity and history and human nature that he foresaw everything and wouldn’t have been able to do so unless he had been an avid proponent of the spirit of man.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Assessing Irony | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 1, 2017 at 12:57 am

    […] awkward or ugly?"), then you're screwed up. (This is, for example, how we can charitably interpret Nietzsche's comments on any number of groups: not as a condemnation of a group of people, but as an argument against an ideology which he thinks […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Paul Hossfield on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Paul on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Frank Levi on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Paul on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Lacan’s Ontology

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

PEL Citizens have access to all podcast episodes, free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Closereads
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in