• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Topic for #57: Henri Bergson on Humor

May 3, 2012 by Mark Linsenmayer 11 Comments

Here's the episode.

What is humor? Henri Bergson's Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (1900) states that humor is a social tool by which we mildly scold each other for being insufficiently adaptive and flexible. On this account, the paradigm of humor is the absent-minded person, but any form of idiocy or freakishness or social ineptness also works: what's funny is the disconnect between the logic of the clown's behavior and what's actually called for socially in the situation.

One key way such a disconnect can be brought about is through the divergence of body and spirit, or more generally between one's intent and an opposing material reality. So a minister farting while giving a sermon would be especially funny.

Much of the book is taken up with stretching this theory to show how different types of humor relate to it. While he sees character humor as I've described above as central, there are derivative types: a funny coincidence mirrors the disconnect we see in character humor. Dramatic irony likewise involves the characters' intent clashing with circumstances of which they are unaware.

Bergson compares a pun or double entendre to the "absent-mindedness of language," where the two disconnected meanings converge interestingly. Sarcasm or verbal irony would involve a comparable kind of clash between meanings. However, Bergson wants to make sure we understand that such a clash itself is not sufficient for humor: an expression's having two meanings is not in itself funny, but only becomes funny because of the relation of those meanings to our interests, e.g. what we say is in direct contrast to what we mean to say and defeats our purposes.

Stretching the theory to fit physical humor, you can see how clumsiness/pratfalls would fall into the same category as absentmindedness and the inappropriate insertion of the body into a situation. Bergson characterizes this as the mechanical in contrast to the organic. A funny face, on this theory, is one that looks stuck in some way, like someone is perpetually surprised, or wincing, or falling asleep. He even says that clothes are inherently funny, given how their texture contrasts with our natural body, but that we get used to it and don't notice unless someone is wearing an unusual fashion (think bell bottoms or a top hat), in which case the strangeness reveals the humor, though again, the strangeness is not itself sufficient for the humor; merely looking strange is not the same as looking funny. He thinks the funny "deformities" are the ones that we could adopt by imitation, so someone missing his legs isn't funny, but hunchbacks, whoa those are hilarious (yes, this is one of his actual examples).

The regular four were joined for this discussion by comedienne Jennifer Dziura, and used Bergson's theory as a launching point to spout off about what is funny, why people's senses of humor differ, and why a theory of humor might not be possible. We didn't get to the bottom of the issue, and I anticipate that there will be at least one more episode on this topic (reading Freud).

Buy the bookor get a free online version.

-Mark Linsenmayer

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: General Announcements Tagged With: Henri Bergson, Jennifer Dziura, philosophy of humor, philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. dmf says

    May 3, 2012 at 10:36 am

    the wiki raises two associations that of Heidegger’s sense of the uncanny in relation to machines/tools (that we are haunted by automaticity) and Dewey’s related sense that we reflect when our usual habits/machinations breakdown or are stalled. Is there more to humor than marking what/who is in or out?
    looking forward to reading this and hearing what you folks make of it.
    http://archive.org/stream/laughteranessay00berggoog#page/n10/mode/2up

    Reply
  2. parrhesiastes says

    May 3, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    Could be an interesting idea to talk about Freud’s position as in “Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious,” where he references Bergson in Chapter VII (Joke and the species of the comic)

    Reply
  3. Wes Alwan says

    May 5, 2012 at 5:41 pm

    parrhesiastes — unfortunately we didn’t get to talk much about Freud, although obviously there are some interesting overlaps with Bergson; dmf — thanks for the relations to Heidegger and Dewey, very interesting and something I’ll explore.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      May 6, 2012 at 8:28 am

      My plan was for us to read the Freud book in a follow-up episode at some point. The topic is too fun to try to do it in one go.

      Reply
  4. Emil Lime says

    May 7, 2012 at 2:31 pm

    Discovered you the other day while looking at the “also recommended” on Stitcher Radio. Where have you guys been? Why didn’t you call? Send me an email? I listened to the Wittgenstein episode with relish and was sitting thinking, “you know, they should do Bergson on Laughter!” Looked up your website and now I have another question. Why am I clairvoyant? It’s a problem. I was raised as a scientist. I don’t like it. Make it stop.

    Reply
  5. Emil Lime says

    May 14, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    “Its appeal is to intelligence, pure and simple. ” There is a table in the 2nd Edition of Fowler’s English Usage that I think lays out the different types of laughter producing speech in contrast to one another. It lists audience, intention and effect if my memory is not failing me. I look forward to hearing this broadcast. Speed the plow…

    Reply
  6. Emil Lime says

    May 18, 2012 at 10:32 pm

    Here is the link to the table from Fowler’s English Usage. This was only in the 2nd edition.

    http://www.wischik.com/damon/Texts/humour.html

    Reply
  7. Emil Lime says

    May 18, 2012 at 10:38 pm

    FEU has a substantial entry just on irony of which it makes several distinctions. Claire Colebrook’s history of irony is the gold standard for a history of irony imho.

    http://www.amazon.com/Irony-The-New-Critical-Idiom/dp/0415251346

    Reply
  8. dmf says

    May 21, 2012 at 6:59 am

    “The Comic Mind of William James”
    http://williamjamesstudies.org/8.1/castillo.pdf

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Comedy can help us tackle the climate crisis – here’s how – Iranian Diaspora says:
    December 18, 2019 at 7:02 am

    […] – instead acts in a machine-like way. Bergson argues that laughing at this incongruity is a social tool by which we mildly scold each other for not being adaptive and flexible […]

    Reply
  2. People Who Are Unhinged, Deranged, And Not Funny Tell Us Comedy Can Help Tackle The Climate Crisis (scam) » Pirate's Cove says:
    December 18, 2019 at 4:25 pm

    […] – instead acts in a machine-like way. Bergson argues that laughing at this incongruity is a social tool by which we mildly scold each other for not being adaptive and flexible […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in