• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Eco Locating Meaning

August 3, 2012 by Dylan Casey 5 Comments

 Every now and then you find something that is, on the one hand, unexpected. The thought of it hadn't occurred to you, neither as a fact found through the memes of popular culture nor as an extrapolation from your current knowledge. On the other hand, the discovery isn't so much a surprise as simply new information that really just fits in with all the rest. My most recent such moment happened at a local used book store, The Frugal Muse, while I was looking for a decent translation of Neitzsche's "On Truth and Lies in the Non-Moral Sense" for an upcoming podcast. Browsing the spines of philosophy tomes that had fallen from other people's shelves, and having truth and meaning on my mind, I picked up a volume of essays titled Meaning and Mental Representations and edited by, among others, Umberto Eco. My limited knowledge of him stems solely from his best-selling work of fiction The Name of the Rosewhich includes a murder that turns on  the hunt for the sole copy of the second portion Aristotle's book on poetics concerning comedy. It turns out (likely as no surprise to most PEL listeners) that Eco is also an academic specializing in semiotics. This new-found fact (for me) fit in just fine with my memories of the novel.

In addition to co-editing the collection I stumbled upon, Eco also contributes an essay called "On Truth. A Fiction." which is a wry, delightful story/dialogue in which  a Terrestrial  comes in contact with an alien civilization called Antipodeans who only speak in terms of the "state of their nerves". The prologue lays out an example conversation with an Antipodean:

Instead of saying It looked like and elephant, but then it struck me that elephants don't occur on this continent, so I realized that it must be a mastodon, they used to say: I had G-412 together with F-11, but then I had S-147.

Following the prologue which sets up the problems of interacting with the brain-state driven Antipodeans, a Terrestrial, Dr. Smith of the Department of Cognitive Sciences of Svalbards University, has a conversation with Charles Sanders Personal, the Antipodean Computer (whose name is abbreviated CSP) since the Antipodean need a place where they actually store propositions, inferences and such. The subsequent conversation begins:

Smith -- Do you understand the sentence every Antipodean has two legs?

CSP -- I can interpret it. I can provide you with analytical paraphrases of it, translations in other languages, equivalent expressions in other sign-systems (I also have a graphics program), examples of other discourses that start from the background assumptions that Antipodeans are two-legged, et cetera. I call all these alternative expressions interpretants. A machine able to furnish inpretants for every expression it receives is an intelligent machine, that is, a machine able to understand expressions.

And so on. I found the whole piece quite delightful, along with the new, if not surprising, discovery that a novelist that I've enjoyed is also a philosopher.

As a complement (fictional or not), you might also enjoy Stanford Encyclopedia's article on mental representation in computational theory of mind.

-Dylan

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Web Detritus Tagged With: Computational Theory of the Mind, fiction, Meaning and Representation, truth, Umberto Eco

Comments

  1. Vasili says

    August 3, 2012 at 7:06 am

    I like the fact you are getting into the question of mental representations.
    There’s interesting stuff done on cultures that deny that we can have knowledge of other people’s mental representations and thus reject the question altogether. It follows that intentions are not relevant to assessing speech or actions in these cultures.
    According to Joel Robbins “there are in Urapmin [of Papua New Guinea] none of the speech acts common in cultures that assume mindreading is part of language comprehension: no promising, thanking, apologizing, or lying, for example.[…]Urapmin never speculate about the thoughts or feelings of others, and they regard attempts to do so not only doomed to failure, but as serious moral breaches of what we might call each person’s ‘psychic privacy.'”
    The big question is to what extent such a theory of the mind actually effects the mental experience of people who hold such views.

    If you have’t already read it I’d also recommend Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum.

    Reply
  2. dmf says

    August 3, 2012 at 9:09 am

    Foucault’s Pendulum is a great book on the tragic quests for a deep/all-encompassing meaning in, and or theory of, Life, and Rorty’s review essay (and Eco’s response) are well worth the reading for philo minded folks:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/57864268/Umberto-Eco-Interpretation-and-Over-Interpretation

    Reply
    • Vasili says

      August 3, 2012 at 10:35 am

      I remember thinking that it was a satire of postmodern or post-structuralist uncertainty, the never-ending deferral of meaning that is coupled with the feverish compulsion to interpret. It’s been over ten years since I read it though. Look forward to reading what Rorty says about it.

      Reply
  3. Geoff says

    August 3, 2012 at 6:00 pm

    Nice find. Eco is one of my favourites. I have enjoyed several of his novels and his essay’s are a joy.

    Reply
  4. Bruce Adam says

    August 4, 2012 at 12:29 am

    I loved “Foucault’s Pendulum” the book and became intrigued by the device. To find out more I ordered a biography of Foucault from my local library. Imagine my disappointment when I received a life of Michel Foucault. I still think of him as the wrong Foucault.
    I believe there’s a Foucault Pendulum in the foyer of the UN building but I’m told it doesn’t work very well.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in