• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

The Problem with Academia Today: Corporatism, Not Identity Politics

August 28, 2012 by Wes Alwan 5 Comments

Andrew Delbanco, author of his own book on what ails today's university, gives the thumbs down to another critique that tilts at feminists and queer theorists: The Victims' Revolution: The Rise of Identity Studies and the Closing of the Liberal Mind.

Delbanco is sympathetic to the notion that identity politics has taken its toll on academic life (as am I). But apparently it's just not as significant force in the academy as it once was:

When I look around, I see younger colleagues returning to close readings of literary classics. I see an emerging synthesis of the old political history focused on kings and presidents with the newer social history of ordinary people written “from the bottom up.” I see graduate students leading discussions on Plato in coffee houses, and undergraduates flocking to such new fields as environmental science in hope of acquiring the knowledge they need to make a positive difference in the world.

According to Delbanco, the problem that the university faces today is not identity politics but corporatism:

... Bawer overlooks the greatest threat to today’s universities. Today, corporate-minded university presidents spout platitudes about “outcome metric” and “game-changing” technologies, while faculty members struggle to piece together a living with multiple part-time jobs, and students search for marketable skills that, they hope, will help them pay off their education debt.

... Bawer is fighting a rear-guard action against an enemy who has largely ceded the field to a new philistine army that has no interest in the culture wars. The humanities and “soft” social science departments that Bawer mocks are sinking into insignificance — partly, to be sure, because they have purveyed the kind of buffoonery he decries. Meanwhile, a more formidable enemy has arrived in the form of resolute utilitarians who discourage students from seeking what Bawer wants for them: the chance, through arduous reading and reflection under the guidance of dedicated teachers, to discover themselves.

-- Wes

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Web Detritus Tagged With: culture wars, delbanco, identity politics, philosophy of education

Comments

  1. dmf says

    August 29, 2012 at 11:48 am

    to the degree that academics focused (and remain focused) on changing the rhetoric (and personnel) of the academy without focusing in any organized way on the economics/politics that supported such efforts these factors are quite intertwined, the academic left is still by and large possessed by the 60’s idea(l) of “consciousness” raising in ways that lead them to ignore even the ways in which they manage (in committees and such) their own daily work let alone the wider tragedies of our times, so it goes with the chattering classes.

    http://www.focusing.org/apm_papers/solomon3.html

    Reply
  2. Vasili says

    August 30, 2012 at 1:51 am

    For a while there, and to an extent this is still true, the money was in the cutting edge buffoonery. You knew the fashionable tags you had to pepper grant applications with in order to seem up to current critical theory. Of course now the pendulum has swung more to the technocratic-utilitarian side. Caught between the rock and the hard place, I’d say (though I prefer self-indulgent identity politics to coming up with new catchphrases for capitalists). Not that the new university management culture or corporate cronies have much interest in anthropologists:
    http://www.livinganthropologically.com/2012/08/21/anthropology-is-the-worst/

    Reply
    • dmf says

      August 30, 2012 at 9:06 am

      or to the degree that they (cronies) have any interest it is in anthropology (medical or such) as a tool for human-resources (a term that should make even non-heideggerians cringe) management.Do you know if anyone one is doing ethnographic studies of university departments?

      Reply
      • Vasili says

        August 30, 2012 at 12:07 pm

        That’s right, medical anthropology etc. was huge for a while. And you still have the less newfangled way to utilize anthropologists as middlemen between multinationals that want natural resources and local people.
        I’m sure someone must be doing ethnography of university departments, but no one comes to mind. Now would certainly be an interesting time to do it.

        Reply
        • dmf says

          August 30, 2012 at 12:32 pm

          yes and now as military agents, on the potential self-study of the academy it would perhaps bring home the idea that knowledge-production and socialization/organization are two sides of the same coin and seems like a good test of the claim that the humanities (writ large) can actually provide skills that make for useful/productive participation in a democracy.

          Reply
  3. Dave says

    March 16, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    Thanks for the post Wes.
    On a side note for the comments -I work in academe, and we are starting to see that self-studies and organizations that do collegiate reviews are rewriting their appraisal formats. The scariest I’ve seen eliminates review of libraries and gives an amendment that allows for consultants to review classes in lieu of fellow faculty.

    This is on top of the nationwide problems we are seeing with administrations taking curriculum out of faculty hands and streamlining it to ease movement through the system, like a university laxative.

    I’ve written more about it and will provide a link:
    http://www.davidloncle.com/blog-1/
    http://www.davidloncle.com/links/

    cheers

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in