• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

The Value of Writing (Non-Fiction)

September 25, 2012 by Seth Paskin 2 Comments

Peg Tyre

In a recent article in The Atlantic, Peg Tyre documents the remarkable turnaround in student performance at an underperforming high school when the curriculum was altered to put a focus on analytic writing.  Analytic writing, it turns out, is a marker of critical thinking:  if you can craft clear and coherent written sentences, paragraphs and essays it generally means you have clear and coherent, well considered thoughts.  Sounds like common sense or maybe even obvious?  Apparently not.  And the ability to write well translates into improved performance in all disciplines, not just English and the Social Sciences.What?  Critical thinking skills help you no matter what subject you are studying?  Sacre bleu!  I was part of that generation that had to do grammar exercises as part of my core studies - I remember what felt like a whole year (probably a semester) doing nothing but diagramming sentences.  Also spelling, handwriting (cursive and block), debate, all that stuff.  Then when I got into advanced grades, we wrote.  First it was outlines, then summaries of books (aka the book report).  Then we had to have ideas about those summaries.

After we had ideas, we had to have arguments.  Remember this structure?  5 paragraphs, Intro, Support, Support, Support, Conclusion.  A gold star for anyone who can tell me in which order you are supposed to put your support points.   By the time I was in 11th and 12th grade (the last two years of high or secondary school) we were doing regular full fledged essays for English and History.  There was a writing component for the SAT and Advanced Placement exams as I remember.

Went I got to college, I knew by comparison to some of my classmates that I had received a strong foundation for critical thinking and analytic writing.  It was an underpinning of my interest and ability in philosophy.  What I didn't understand was how important School House Rock was.

What words, Scharff asked, did kids who wrote solid paragraphs use that the poor writers didn’t? Good essay writers, the history teacher noted, used coordinating conjunctions to link and expand on simple ideas—words like for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so. Another teacher devised a quick quiz that required students to use those conjunctions. To the astonishment of the staff, she reported that a sizable group of students could not use those simple words effectively.

Conjunction junction what is your function?

These 14- and 15-year-olds didn’t know how to use some basic parts of speech. With such grammatical gaps, it was a wonder they learned as much as they did. “Yes, they could read simple sentences,” but works like the Gettysburg Address were beyond them—not because they were too lazy to look up words they didn’t know, but because “they were missing a crucial understanding of how language works. They didn’t understand that the key information in a sentence doesn’t always come at the beginning of that sentence.”

Oh, echos of Wittgenstein.  So anyway the solution is to teach...wait for it...grammar!  And "how to turn ideas into simple sentences, and how to construct complex sentences from simple ones by supplying the answer to three prompts—but, because, and so."  Followed by although, unless and if.  Really?  Is it that simple?  Of course students of logic know how tricky if can be but the takeaway from the article for me was that given the right analytic tools, most students can reason effectively, evaluate arguments and take and express positions articulately.  Things that I thought were the province of college level philosophy boil down to basic particles of speech.  Those mid-century analytic bastards were on to something.

--seth

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings, Web Detritus Tagged With: educational theory, peg tyre, philosophy blog

Comments

  1. cONNOR says

    September 26, 2012 at 9:32 am

    Fantastic article!

    It is unfortunate that we have an American university system that is so caught up in a system of under funding/ debt/ vocation, where the need to compete on a global level makes programs such as philosophy and literature (more broadly, the humanitities) seem unnecessary simply because they are disciplines of knowledge which will not be able to ever turn a direct capital profit.

    Ironically, what is one of the main complaints of employers with regards to new applicants? The utter inability for new graduates to clearly and/ or appropriatetly communicate.

    I like the Wittgenstien reference because I recently graduated from a SUNY literature program and I could not, for the life of me, understand why Wittgenstein is not taught in more literature/ rhetoric courses. Saussure still is (if he is really an antiquated figure in linguistics) but Wittgenstien’s observations, if nothing else, reify the importance that Saussure and linguistics places on language. And it is a clear understanding of this fundamental importance that needs to be brought back into the American public sphere.

    Reply
  2. Stanley says

    September 27, 2012 at 7:50 pm

    Seth, you sound a bit like a grumpy old man on his porch, waving your cane at the kids on the lawn. That said, I think I agree with your premise (probably cause I’m an old man, too). I wonder, though, if Wittgenstein would agree with the idea that intellectual ability is truly linked to technical language skills. Keep up the great work on the site.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in