• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Closereads
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Closereads
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

15 Minutes of Fame

October 9, 2012 by Seth Paskin 1 Comment

Shameless cleavage shot of Mrs. Famous

Andy Warhol famously said that "In the future, everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes."  This is commonly interpreted to mean that the hierarchical structure that identified worthy subjects of art - 'celebrities' - from those not worthy - 'civilians' (thanks Liz!) was breaking down.  In other words the structure that delineated who was famous from who was not would break down, making it possible for everyone to be famous.

You could also infer that this would mean that no one would be famous, but Warhol was clearly right as we still have fame and there are people now who have become famous outside of the traditional model of celebrity (Honey Boo Boo).  So if anyone can now become a celebrity, that is, can be sacrificed on the alter of fame, what does that mean for Payne's thesis that celebrities serve a social function in society?

As you'll remember from our fame episode with Lucy, Payne puts forth the thesis that "celebrities fill a social need, an outlet for our collective aggression, that we can trace back to ancient times, where young maidens were lavishly bestowed with fineries and then sacrificed. We idolize them, but set them up to disappoint our expectations, at which point we turn on them and raise up a fresher, younger replacement."  In essence, famous people are proxy sacrifices, serving as an outlet for the community's violent urges.

So if everyone can be a celebrity, we are likely to see a vast increase in the number of famous people, suggesting that a) we have an ever increasing need to vent suppressed violence or b) we have an increasing number of outlets to vent the same amount of urges.  There is a question of causality here:  does the need to have an outlet drive the creation of sacrificial victims?  If so, as new/social media and the breakdown of the hierarchical structure make it easier for anyone to become a celebrity are we seeing the creation of a greater number of celebrities for sacrifice as a direct result of society's urge to violence?

It can't be denied that the relatively recent phenomenon of reality TV has created a tremendous amount of fodder for cathartic Schadenfreude.  At least among my acquaintances, seeing average to despicable characters engage in socially unacceptable behavior, petty conflicts and make fools of themselves is a delight of the 'train wreck' variety.  It's a disaster but you can't look away.

This differs somewhat from part of the discussion we had with Lucy, about the need to build someone up before seeing them torn down.  Many of these people are set up to be immediately torn down (contrast the Bachelorette to The Situation).  So we might ask whether the new 'debased' form of celebrity is actually serving the same purpose.  Honey Boo Boo is in no way to be idolized prior to her inevitable disappointment.  And this suggests a critical differentiator for me:  Schadenfreude does not function like Fame.

Fame, on Payne's account, is a formal social mechanism.  Ritualistic, cross-cultural, timeless.  It is a relation between the one and the many.  Like rites of spring, it signals a kind of recurrence of the same as celebrities are born, grow up and die.  The enjoyment of seeing others debase and exploit themselves for your entertainment is something else altogether.  It's more akin to a fascination with the macabre or bizarre, closer to the fascination with freaks at a carnival than the interaction with celebrity.

Although the mechanisms for publicizing and interacting with objects of both Fame and Schadenfreude are the same, they seem to function differently for us.  There is no positive association with the latter, there is no catharsis upon their fall.  It is expected as part of what they are, not as part of a cycle through which they are traveling as a proxy for us.  And there is no possibility of eternal idolization, which I was trying to get to in the discussion about Cal Ripken (relevant given the O's resurgence this year) and which didn't come across in the podcast.  I'll think about following that up in another post later.

--seth

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: lucy lawless, philosphy blog, Theory of Fame, tom payne

Comments

  1. Bob Lyman says

    October 9, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    Could you call it a “Deconstruction of falling stars”?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Paul Hossfield on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Paul on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Frank Levi on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Paul on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Lacan’s Ontology

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

PEL Citizens have access to all podcast episodes, free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Closereads
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in