• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

The Upside of Fandom

October 22, 2012 by Daniel Horne 3 Comments

A recent blog post at New York Magazine's Vulture blog queries whether fandom is inherently pathological. This seems a fair question to ask after some of the more amusing anecdotes revealed on the Lucy Lawless episode:

[Fandom is], by definition, a bit different from hobbies like cooking or learning an instrument in that fandom is in the service of someone else’s creativity rather than one’s own. And all the time invested in these pop-culture passions: Who among us hasn't wondered what else we could be getting done with the time spent studying up on or arguing about them?

The article quotes some psychologists to argue the obvious observation that, yes, fandom can go too far, and anyway, shouldn't you be spending more time producing and less time consuming? Fair enough, but that's only trivially true. What I found aggravating about the piece is that it treated fandom as responsible for nothing more than harmless escapism or pathological passivity. That's a false choice.

Fandom can just as often produce a creative response, or provide life-directing inspiration. Think about the first Puerto-Rican astronaut, who was originally inspired by her love of Star Trek. Or look at Paul McCartney's early obsession with Little Richard  -- how many Beatles tracks would sound they way they do today, but for McCartney's Little Richard-inspired screaming? Where would Gauguin or Van Gogh be without their admiration for Hokusai and Hiroshige? Or to turn to philosophy, think of Nietzsche's early adulation of Schopenhauer. UCLA historian Eugen Weber relates an amusing anecdote about a 19th century French labor leader who was asked whether he was more inspired by Karl Marx or Georges Sorel, to which the labor leader replied, "Lord no, I don't read this sort of chap -- I read Alexandre Dumas, I read The Three Musketeers!"

In short, being a "fan" means nothing more than that one has heroes. And having a hero is as likely to provide an impetus to self-improvement as it is to curdle into unhealthy obsession or narcotic escapism. That's true whether the object of admiration derives from high culture or low, whether the hero is an athlete, astronaut or actor. To return to Ms. Lawless' own fanbase: here are a number of candid statements from Xena fans who describe the positive influence a heroic female figure made on their day-to-day lives. Now, that's an accomplishment few actors manage, and one in which Ms. Lawless can take some real pride.

-Daniel Horne

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings, Web Detritus Tagged With: Celebrity, fandom, lucy lawless, philosophy blog

Comments

  1. Gary Chapin says

    October 24, 2012 at 6:48 am

    I find phrases like “in service of” (from the quote), to be red flags — someone’s asserting a motive to a non-person. “Fandom” may be “in service” of someone else’s art (does that make it servile?), but it could also be “in service” of one’s own aspirations, or even — I know this isn’t so lofty — “in service” of a good time.

    Reply
    • Daniel Horne says

      October 24, 2012 at 12:45 pm

      Well put!

      I suspect the author was probably trying to divide a line between [good] “creation” and [bad] “consumption.” But even that distinction breaks down. Constantly practicing the same Beethoven sonata on your piano isn’t inherently creative, nor is constantly trying to master your favorite uncle’s BBQ recipe.

      Conversely, even if one is particularly “consumed” by a work of a literature or film (even a low-brow pop culture-y one), I won’t concede that there’s creative frission that occurs, even if the thing ultimately “created” is not an object, but rather a kind of intellectual/emotional paradigm by which one chooses to base one’s goals and aspirations. Fandom can help forge one’s own personality, in that sense.

      Reply
      • Daniel Horne says

        October 24, 2012 at 3:26 pm

        Correction – meant to write “… I won’t concede that no creative frission occurs…”

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in