• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Not School Digest Nov-Dec 2012: A Bonus Quasisode

December 16, 2012 by Mark Linsenmayer 6 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_Not_School_Digest_Nov-Dec_2012.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 30:39 — 28.2MB)

Excerpts of discussions about David Chalmers's The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, Thomas Nagel's Mind and Cosmos, and Paul Auster's City of Glass.

What's the relation between mind and brain? What is consciousness? Can science study consciousness, and can evolution really account for it? What is the self and how does this relate to language? All these questions are tackled in these discussions, which were recorded as part of PEL's Not School members-only website (aka PEL Citizenship). Each was recorded by a PEL podcaster (Mark or Wes, for the ones here) in conjunction with 2-5 listeners who joined a Not School group. Not School gives us the chance to cover more material than we have time to tackle as a full PEL group as well as the chance to get to talk with such great people: the listeners involved are often fully as articulate and informative as the guests we've had on the show, with expertise not only in philosophy, but in science, the arts, and other disciplines. (Don't be intimidated though; we've got active Not Schoolers of all levels.) Yes, the recording quality is not nearly as good as for our regular episodes, but you'll get past it.

Read more and sign up at www.partiallyexaminedlife.com/pel-not-school-introduction. This will give you access to the full-length (ca. 90 min) recordings of these, plus lots of supporting forum posts on these readings. Best yet, you can join these ongoing groups yourselves, among many others. New ones are being proposed now to kick off at the beginning of January, so get in there to try to draft people into reading what you want to read (or listen to, or watch).

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Not School Report, Podcast Episodes Tagged With: David Chalmers, Not School, Paul Auster, philosophy podcast, Thomas Nagel

Comments

  1. Frank Callo says

    December 17, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    I want to direct my comments primarily to the first section of this minisode.

    I wonder if Spinoza came up anywhere in this discussion beyond what is presented here. Seems that some of the points that were made Re panpsychism can be profitably explored through Spinoza’s distinction between thought and extension. Spinoza posited something like “thought (mind?) is a property of the universe in the same way extension in space is”. If this is so, then some of what Chalmers seems (from what I gather here) is saying is that mind might not be reducable to physical process because it is simply an aspect of what those processes ARE. This is where Nagel comes in because mind is what, a bat for example, is TO ITSELF. The mind of a bat is a property of “batness”. It isn’t reducable to something else for the same reason that you can’t explain why a triangle has three angles which must always equal 180 degrees. There isn’t an explanation because “180 degreeness” is part of what it is to BE a triangle.

    The various states that the brain (or a thermostat {or a stone}) can be in are distinguished, one from another, by differences between those states but the thing that is in one state, then another, trancends, MUST TRANCEND, those states in order for the states to come about. If this is not the case, the brain in one state or another is a different thing entirely from what it is in other states. In such a situation it would be nearly impossible to know what we are even talking about. The mind, it seems to me, might be the way a brain is (or anything else is) from inside, so to speak, the continuity of the thing which is no new problem in philosophy, it rests down there with that old “thing in itself”.

    I think you dealt with this problem in a different way in the episode on Chaung Tzu. I think, in general, that the Taoist classics have a lot to say about the problem of “is-ness”, perhaps the mind is the isness of the thing.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      December 18, 2012 at 1:45 am

      If you must call it a minisode, call it a triminisode. It is only mini in relation to our normal sodes. Compared to a regular podcast, it is totally standard sized.

      Seriously, though, yes, I should really re-listen to that Spinoza episode, and I would like to do a real panpsychism PEL episode at some point. For this discussion, we had enough trouble just figuring out the Chalmers book and didn’t try to bring in outside stuff, and what he has to say about panpsychism is mostly just suggestive, namely that we’re driven to some form of this view because it doesn’t make sense for qualia to just suddenly wink into existence when you have a certain complexity of structure. Since he thinks that the phenomenal is not explained by (in that it’s conceptually separable from) the physical, then a physical (or functional) description is not going to give an account of consciousness… you’re not going to be able to explain why adding one more piece to a physical puzzle suddenly gives you consciousness. If you can’t build consciousness, therefore, it must be a fundamental feature of the world that merely takes the form it does for us because of a complex structure, i.e. because of our abilities and the contents of what we’re conscious of… the objects of our complex awareness. None of this can explain the raw property of awareness itself, but we can say a lot about what about our brains makes our experience structured in the way it is for us. There just has to be “experience” in its raw form before it can be structured in any particular way.

      That’s the best I can do to make sense of a pretty strange view.

      Reply
      • dmf says

        January 11, 2013 at 8:44 am

        one related take, via Whitehead, is panexperientialism, which is also pretty out there but less so than full blown panpsychisms, Steven Shaviro would be a good guest for such a discussion:
        http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/22351462

        Reply
        • dmf says

          January 11, 2013 at 8:44 am

          http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Claremont2010.pdf

          Reply
  2. Alan Cook says

    January 10, 2013 at 12:24 pm

    Just saw these responses here.

    I agree that panpsychism is a view to be taken very seriously, and that Spinoza is the most important expositor of that position in the modern European tradition. Would be interested in taking a closer look at him.

    Re Daoism: I love reading Chuang Tzu, but ancient Chinese texts pose tremendous hermeneutic difficulties. Seems to me that discussions among contemporary Westerners who aren’t specialists in are more discussions of a particular translator’s or interpretator’s theories than they are of something that we can identify as a “Daoist view.”

    Reply
    • dmf says

      January 11, 2013 at 8:37 am

      to my knowledge Spinoza was not an advocate of panpychism but I would be interested in any primary source textual references in support of such a view that you might have to share.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in