• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Closereads
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Closereads
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Scrutability: The PPT

December 29, 2012 by Seth Paskin 5 Comments

 

Credit manwithoutqualities.com

If you don't know what the acronym "PPT" means, consider yourself lucky that you have avoided a work or social context where doing presentations is required.  If you are like me, the power of those three letters to inspire dread is almost unparalleled.  The phrase 'Can you put together some slides...' evokes panic, fear and nausea made worse only when accompanied by 'What's the business case?'

For those who don't know, "PPT" is short for "PowerPoint" and more commonly a "PowerPoint Presentation".  PowerPoint is a Microsoft Office application used for creating visual presentations.  It allows for the presentation of information in text, visual, graphical and audio/visual format through a slide-show series of pages.  

Now, PowerPoint as a tool is neither good nor bad; it's my experience in having to use it which has given me the negative connotations.  In fact, creating presentations with the intent of conveying information to a broad and diverse audience can be a terrific exercise in sharpening one's thinking, messaging and arguments.  It requires one to boil down extended proof points into limited and concise statements; select only the most salient supporting data; make explicit what the idea/goal/desired outcome is and how the data and argument support it.

As such I have long felt that philosophers would do well to try and express the contents of convoluted papers and books in a presentation format - much like they would if they were teaching a class.  I surmise that many such presentation examples exist on hard drives, USB keys and university intranets around the world but precious few make their way out into the public domain.

Thus my surprise and delight to find a presentation by David Chalmers on Scrutability.  Not having the interest in reading his book and participating in the podcast, I did want to be partially responsible and at least get a basic understanding of some of the key theses.  I can't say that having the argument presented in this format makes it any more appealing but it certainly makes it more compact.  V-Truth D indeed.  Now if we can just get philosophers to use more pictures and videos...

--seth

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: David Chalmers, philosophy blog, PowerPoint, scrutability

Comments

  1. Daniel Horne says

    December 30, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    Agreed on all points, thanks for sharing this!

    Reply
  2. Paul Paolini says

    December 31, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    Philosophers seem not to be an especially visual sort of thinker, but some of Daniel Dennett’s presentations, viewable on Youtube, may be a paradigm of what you’re talking about. (Not that I necessary endorse Dennett’s philosophical views or outlook.)

    Reply
    • Jason Stable says

      January 3, 2013 at 9:09 am

      I always remember John Searle during a Google talk saying with real feeling how much he can’t stand power point and I picture Dennett’s frequent power point presentations, so they don’t agree on that either! Actually Searle’s a much better speaker than Dennett, imo. More engaging.

      Reply
  3. Jplat says

    December 31, 2012 at 6:48 pm

    Couldn’t agree more about PPT and about the potential applications for philosophers. I use it quite a bit at work and we’ve had an outside consultant tell us that there should be zero text on a powerpoint slide (all charts/graphs). He says that it convolutes the slide when you have to read bullet points. He prefers keeping it all visual. Not sure whether or not I agree but for a philosophy presentation it certainly has some interesting applications.

    Reply
  4. Bruce Scherer says

    January 2, 2013 at 1:34 am

    There’s a possibly apocryphal story that the reason why NASA fell into tough technical times with the space shuttle is the prevalence of PowerPoint for conveying information.

    Microsoft has tried to sex it up in recent years with XML and adding an “x” to .pptx and .docx and, help us all, xlsx but we won’t be fooled!

    There are many learning styles: hands-on, auditory, visual, and so on. But great zombie Jesus when a presenter starts reading aloud, verbatim, what is already on the slide in front of the room it makes me so mad I could bite.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Bruce Scherer Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Paul on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Frank Levi on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Paul on Ep. 326: Guest Michael Tomasello on the Evolution of Agency (Part One)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Lacan’s Ontology
  • wayne schroeder on Lacan’s Ontology

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

PEL Citizens have access to all podcast episodes, free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Closereads
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in