• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Topic for #73: Why Philosophy?

March 6, 2013 by Mark Linsenmayer 14 Comments

Why?Listen to the episode.

We've had requests in the past for a general discussion of what philosophy is, without focusing on any particular text, and I've always swatted these aside, as I was afraid that the conversation would be too unmoored, too bullshitty. Well, last Sunday, 3/3/13, we recorded just such an episode, by accident as it were.

See, we're trying to write a book, and trying to figure out how to have some of the PEL-style interaction get into that book instead of it just being some essays by us individually. So we took a stab at having a short conversation that we could then transcribe and edit into a dialogue chapter.

Two hours later, we had a full, regular-quality episode, and while some of what was said will be familiar to long-time listeners, we still managed to surprise each other, and probably engage with each other (as opposed to monologuing) a bit more than on a regular episode.

The question "why do philosophy?" of course morphed in part to "why did we in particular get started doing philosophy?" Our touchstone in preparing this was to keep in mind our previous discussions of Plato's Apology and Gorgias, so there's a little bit of Plato talk in there, but for the most part is just our own opinions about what makes philosophy valuable and how it differs from science on the one side and religion on the other. (And even how it's like art!)

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: General Announcements

Comments

  1. dmf says

    March 6, 2013 at 3:08 pm

    http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/meta/autobio.htm

    Reply
  2. Randall Miron says

    March 6, 2013 at 3:37 pm

    Very much welcome. All I have to say at this point is that if you slag on Wittgenstein, I will cry, or stomp around cursing, or write angry posts on Facebook, or maybe even try to think afresh about what Ludwig has to say about philosophy and its (de)merits. 🙂

    Reply
  3. Aaron Watson says

    March 6, 2013 at 4:00 pm

    Sounds very interesting – I think my favorite parts of the podcast are after the initial setup is done (vegetables) and you get into the meat of what it really means, and reflecting on the reading (dessert). This sounds like it will be all-meat with some desert, i.e. comfort food.

    I apologize for my analogy but I just came from a lunch buffet.

    My two cents, we’re studying/reflecting/interpreting our experience of the world, and also the qualities or limitations of that experience on some meta-level, and from that mobius strip of data we’re creating our own meaning to those events, and then deriving how that meaning dictates what actions we should take in the future. And from those actions we perceive new inputs which cause the process to loop over again and again and again, building on it’s new insights (or errors).

    Reply
  4. Nate Johnson says

    March 6, 2013 at 4:09 pm

    Very exciting.
    I was listening recently to some other (ie lesser) podcast and the the guest was saying that he thought philosophy was more like art than like science. It seems that ‘philosophy is like ______’ is pretty common, whether it’s a philosopher stating outright that philosophy should be considered a science, or someone trying to turn philosophy into math, etc. I don’t hear very often that science, religion, or art are just branches of philosophy, which sounds like it has as much going for it s anything else. Is there a kind of insecurity within the history of philosophy that leads to these kind of re-identifications? Or is more that the insecurity lies in the artists, the theologians, and the scientists trying to take philosophy down a peg or two, and philosophy, like Socrates, has its head too much in the ‘Clouds’ to respond to criticism (better)?
    -Nate

    Reply
    • dmf says

      March 6, 2013 at 6:44 pm

      academic philosophy is having a very hard time these days (at least in the USA) trying to make any claims for both legitimacy and relevance/usefulness to folks outside of the discipline (and a few on the inside), and in our current political climate many depts are on the ever shortening line to the chopping-block (not to be confused with History’s slaughter-block).

      Reply
      • Glen says

        March 6, 2013 at 9:19 pm

        At my university, all the humanities are being eviscerated. They don’t make money, which is King of course, so all the money goes to the engineers and business guys.

        Really sad for the people most interested in literature.

        Reply
        • Nate Johnson says

          March 6, 2013 at 10:14 pm

          I was a creative writing major in college and I’ve always felt that literature and the humanities in general, including, importantly, philosophy, had a great importance for mankind. I think that the humanities give individuals perspective, other points of view. I think that seeing the world from another perspective, somebody else’s point of view is essential in making great human beings. Math and science are important, but I think all this focus on them is dangerous in the long run.

          Reply
      • Nate Johnson says

        March 6, 2013 at 10:08 pm

        Well, not to say that philosophical thought never promotes the status quo, but the status quo doesn’t need any help from philosophy staying right where it is. To me it seems that most of the great changes in the world have sprung from philosophy. And not to inject politics, overly, into this (because it’s not always political), but those with vested interests in the status quo are almost always those who would have the power to empower (or more usually depower) change. I’m not convinced that vested interests are intentionally devaluing philosophy and the other humanities, but I think it goes a long way towards explaining why there isn’t a lot of fighting to keep it around.
        -Nate

        Reply
  5. Michael Rissman says

    March 6, 2013 at 9:16 pm

    I came to the site tonight to post on what philosophy has done for me in the past month. It has made my life more livable in the face of circumstances that might make it otherwise. The two heroes of this story are first Socrates and then Epicurus.

    Up until a month ago I volunteered lots of hours at a local grade school. I had been volunteering for a few years working with advanced math students. Then, a teacher, to save her own skin, accused me of improper behavior with the students. The school had no choice but to turn the case over to the police. All the school told me was that I should stay away – they could tell me nothing about the charges or who made them. I saw a lawyer. His first words after hello were, “Prepare to spend the rest of your life in jail even if you are innocent.” He went on to explain that child molestation cases were the modern equivalent of witch hunts and that if they wanted to get me they could.

    It took the police a couple of weeks to complete the investigation. I looked over my shoulder a lot and looked out the window wondering if the car I heard approaching was the police coming to get me. But I did not think of running, nor did I feel sorry for myself. I thought of the example Socrates set. He reminded me or my responsibility to the kids. If I were to die in jail, and child molesters don’t live long in jail, so be it.

    No sooner was that cleared then I got a phone call from my oncologist saying that a recent routine CAT scan showed that cancer that had been in remission might be back. Epicurus helped me anticipate that day. I have lived a full and generous life and I am ready for the end whenever it comes. I have decided that chemo would never be an option. I’m healthy now and strong and will stay that way as long as I can. Today I got the results of a MRI; it is cancer. I will get a biopsy and then will have the growth removed from my liver. But I am calm in knowing that it is in my power to make the end as good as I want it to be.

    They say that burrowing animals dig exploratory tunnels for the joy of it. Evolution selects for the trait because tunnels dug out of curiosity come in handy for escape. I read philosophy out of curiosity. I enjoy thinking about what makes a good life. That my curiosity has paid off is serendipity.

    Thanks guys

    Reply
    • Wayne Schroeder says

      March 7, 2013 at 1:14 am

      Holy crap Michael, that is one boatload of S&%H^*&T%(*F&C%(*&^K (my philosophical response).

      Reply
  6. Dyami Hayes says

    March 7, 2013 at 6:56 am

    So just to clarify: This episode will NOT be about feline aesthetics?

    Wow. Disappointing P.E.L…. bunch of rac- errr… catists!

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      March 7, 2013 at 9:43 am

      It is rather insensitive for that cat to be wearing blueface.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Mark Pitches Philosophy to Clergy | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    March 22, 2013 at 11:35 am

    […] our soon-to-be-released ep. 73, we give something of a sales pitch for doing philosophy: for being interested in reading this […]

    Reply
  2. Episode 73: Why Do Philosophy? (And What Is It?) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    March 22, 2013 at 9:13 pm

    […] We did no formal reading for this discussion, but did tell each other to keep in mind Plato’s “Apology.” For more information, look here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Jason Engelund on Ep. 318: Friedrich Schiller on the Civilizing Potential of Art (Part Three for Supporters)
  • Albi Bilali on Ep. 318: Friedrich Schiller on the Civilizing Potential of Art (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Jason Engelund on Ep. 318: Friedrich Schiller on the Civilizing Potential of Art (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Eric on Ep. 318: Friedrich Schiller on the Civilizing Potential of Art (Part One)
  • Vincent Czyz on Lucifer: How a Decent Deity Got a Bad Rap (Part 1)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy ·Â Terms of Use ·Â Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in