• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

PREVIEW-Episode 81: Jung on the Psyche and Dreams

August 29, 2013 by Mark Linsenmayer 18 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PREVIEW-PEL_ep_081_8-7-13.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 31:21 — 28.8MB)

This is a short preview of the full episode.

Buy Now Purchase this episode for $2.99. Or become a PEL Citizen for $5 a month, and get access to this and all other paywalled episodes, including 68 back catalogue episodes; exclusive Part 2's for episodes published after September, 2020; and our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally.

On Carl Jung's "Approaching the Unconscious" from Man and His Symbols, written in 1961.

What's the structure of the mind? Jung followed Freud in positing an unconscious distinct from the conscious ego, but Jung's picture has the unconscious much more stuffed full of all sorts of stuff from who knows where, including instincts (the archetypes) that tend to give rise to behavior and dream imagery that we'd have to call religious. We neglect this part of ourselves at our psychological peril, and Jung also attributes the ills of the age (like nihilism and WWII) to being out of touch with our larger, unconscious selves.

Sound like goofy pop psychology? Well, Jung's book was written specifically for the populace, and many have run with his emphasis on spiritual self-knowledge and his openness to talk of the paranormal to conclusions less well founded than Jung would have liked. Mark, Seth, and Wes keep trying to make the text speak to other philosophical works but eventually get sidetracked and occasionally personal on this very special episode.

Read more about the topic and get the text. Listen to Wes's introduction.

Looking for the full Citizen version?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Carl Jung, collective unconscious, philosophy of psychology, philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. Toby Keymer says

    August 29, 2013 at 3:56 pm

    “Collectively Unconscious.” Genius.

    Reply
  2. JS says

    August 30, 2013 at 3:26 am

    Just wanna say Seth is my dude. He’s basically me in his entire world view. Does my liking and agreeing with nearly everything he says make me a narcissist? They need to have a Seth entry on SEP someday. I’ve listened to about 30 episodes thus far.

    Reply
    • Seth Paskin says

      August 30, 2013 at 6:41 am

      Thanks JS. Liking me does not make you a narcissist, it just means you have great taste. AS for the SEP – that might be a reach. Perhaps Wikipedia.

      I appreciate the kudos!
      –seth

      Reply
  3. Baron says

    August 30, 2013 at 4:42 pm

    Hey guys! I’ve been listening to the podcasts a lot lately. A hobby of mine is Jungian cognitive types, Myers-Briggs, and the Russian version, Socionics, and I can’t help wonder as I listen to you guys talk what types you are… Is it too personal to ask which types you fall under?

    Thanks guys!

    Reply
  4. dmf says

    August 30, 2013 at 7:52 pm

    it’s too bad that Jung didn’t connect his early work on feeling-toned-complexes with the work of William James and the pragmatists on habits, he would have been well on his way to some of what we now are coming to understand in terms of our non-conceptual response-abilities, Alva Noe gets to much of the state of the art (nascent as it is) in his new book on Real Presences.
    Always important I think in terms of any attempts at so called dream analysis/interpretation to keep in mind that the dream itself is not present in our waking life and so we are dealing with recreations/interpretations at best.
    Here is Noe on Concepts&Practical knowledge:

    Reply
  5. Roger, Australia says

    September 3, 2013 at 4:23 pm

    At the conclusion of this podcast, one of your hosts laments that he found the Jung reading “thin” and “for a general audience”. Isn’t the whole premise of this podcast one of non-professional philosophers making obscure academic philosophical scholarship more accessible to an informed lay audience?

    To be honest, this is the first of your podcasts I’ve go through right to the end. In general – and this may be a cultural thing – I find your discussions wordy, obscurantist and just a little bit pompous.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      September 3, 2013 at 4:53 pm

      Welcome, Roger. The premise of the podcast is not primarily a presentation to a lay audience, or any audience at all, but having a conversation. Still, having an audience and trying to play at that level (not that we always succeed) keeps us honest: if you can’t explain yourself clearly, you likely don’t know what you’re talking about.

      On the flip side, these figures are often new to us, so we really don’t know what we’re talking about. Since “obscurantism” implies an intentional obscuring of the truth, I’ll deny that, but we often fall short of our aim to be clear, and honestly, much as we try, we can’t keep explaining some basic terms over and over, so a bit of stopping to look up terms on the Internet and/or going back and listening to the episodes from the beginning may be required to really get every little bit.

      Having complete thoughts, especially when you’re grasping like we often are, requires going on and on about things. Short, concise sentences only come when you’ve already figured it out and have presented it a hundred times (and often not even then).

      I think the complaint about the Jung work in particular was that it seemed he was glossing over some of the subtleties in this work that would really be required to actually evaluate it.

      Thanks for listening and sharing your thoughts.

      Best,

      -Mark

      Reply
      • Wayne Schroeder says

        September 3, 2013 at 5:49 pm

        Mark, your response was worth the price of admission alone 🙂

        Reply
      • Roger, Australia says

        September 6, 2013 at 8:07 am

        Thank you Mark, for your gracious and patient reply to my possibly typically Australian directness.

        I am reminded if this statement by Montaigne:

        “Difficulty is a coin which the learned conjure with so as not to reveal the vanity of their studies and which human stupidity is keen to accept in payment.”

        On the other hand I recognize that stretching oneself beyond one’s comfort zone of understanding is the path to growth. I will persist.

        Reply
        • Anthony Draper says

          September 15, 2013 at 9:01 pm

          This may very well have been the most pleasant flame-war I’ve ever observed! Bravo, to both gentlemen!

          Reply
  6. Rob says

    September 11, 2013 at 4:57 am

    Hi guys – loving the podcast. Just listened to the Jung one, a thinker I’ve looked at a lot – SETH states at the beginning he doesn’t believe in the introversion/extraversion dichotomy – FASCINATED to know why Seth!

    PS I think recognition of the all-pervading effect of such “personality differences” will comprise the next Kantian revolution in human thought. But then I also think They Might Be Giants are a better band than the Beatles. Yours, Nottingham, England, Old World.

    Reply
  7. Piaget says

    September 15, 2013 at 12:45 am

    JEAN PIAGET EPISTEMOLOGY!!!!

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      September 15, 2013 at 8:02 am

      I assume you’re referring to the “Structuralism” book? Yes, I liked that a lot and will put that in our list of options. (If there’s a different or supplementary text to that you had in mind, please speak up.)

      Reply
      • dmf says

        September 15, 2013 at 9:01 am

        http://www.academia.edu/2131473/Experiential_structuralism_and_neo-Piagetian_theories_Toward_an_integrated_model

        Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Partially Naked Self-Examination Music Blog: “Bedlam” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 29, 2013 at 2:25 pm

    […] tracks have appeared on episodes.) This one sat nearly done and farking awesome for 13 years until our Jung episode made me finish it by adding some the bass, as well as some organ (well, organ sound from Steinberg […]

    Reply
  2. Precognition of Ep. 81: Jung | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 15, 2013 at 11:22 pm

    […] An introduction to Carl Jung’s Man and His Symbols, read by Wes Alwan. After you listen to this, listen to the full episode. […]

    Reply
  3. The Jung and the Restless | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 28, 2013 at 9:23 am

    […] favorite podcasters partially examined “the spiritual problem of modern man” in episode 81, particularly during a 24-minute stretch between 36:00 and 1:00:00. They collectively speculated […]

    Reply
  4. Archetypes in dreams says:
    December 20, 2014 at 2:56 pm

    […] of the images and not the archetypes themselves when you say they are "counterparts". http://partiallyexaminedlife.com…/29/ep81-jung/ PaladinX thanked this post. Reply   Reply With […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy ·Â Terms of Use ·Â Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in