• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

PREVIEW-Episode 84: Nietzsche’s “Gay Science”

November 11, 2013 by Mark Linsenmayer 38 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PREVIEW-PEL_ep_084_10-20-13.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 32:45 — 30.1MB)

This is a short preview of the full episode.

Buy Now Purchase this episode for $2.99. Or become a PEL Citizen for $5 a month, and get access to this and all other paywalled episodes, including 68 back catalogue episodes; exclusive Part 2's for episodes published after September, 2020; and our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally.

On Friedrich Nietzsche's The Gay Science (1882, with book 5 added 1887).

What is wisdom? Nietzsche gives us an updated take on the Socratic project of challenging your most deeply held beliefs. Challenge not just your belief in God ("God is dead!") but uncover all your habits of thinking in terms of the divine. Question the motives behind relentless inquiry: the "will to truth." Realize how little of your life is actually a matter of conscious reflection, and the consequent limits on self-knowledge. The very act of systematization in philosophy overestimates what we can know; instead, we need a "gay" (in the sense of cheerful, carefree, and subversive) science (in the sense of organized knowledge; this is not about modern experimental science) that chases after fleeting insights and is able to question, i.e. laugh at, the pretensions of its own activity. This is the position from which one can then artistically create one's own character and one's values, and this "creation" is not whimsical in the sense of arbitrary, but is a matter of rigorous and careful discernment, an exercise of one's "intellectual conscience." Hear Mark, Wes, and Dylan frolic through this field of aphorisms and short essays.

Read more about the topic, find out exactly which sections we read, and get the text.

Looking for the full Citizen version?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Friedrich Nietzsche, philosophy of psychology, the examined life, the philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. swallerstein says

    November 12, 2013 at 11:46 am

    In the discussion someone wonders whether Central Europe was as Victorian as England during Nietzsche’s lifetime.

    Nietzsche is only 12 years older than Freud, and if one reads Freud about sexuality in German-speaking Vienna, one finds a very sexually repressive, Victorian atmosphere.

    Reply
  2. qapla says

    November 12, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    Awesome episode and discussion.
    It’s amazing listening to this, and it has been awhile since I read The Gay Science or the Joyful Wisdom, Die fröhliche Wissenschaft (frolic/frolicking is a cognate with frolich)
    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/frolic
    how I don’t know, how rhizomatic Nietzsche and this work is to so much that has been in the podcasts and blog posts.

    What came to mind at one point was a sentence in a pdf dmf linked to:

    “…the metaphysics they inspire –whether construed in physicalist or dualist terms – generate a litany of well-known philosophical problems (Dennett 1991 provides a useful catalogue). Worse still, taking such accounts seriously not only sponsors an unattractive metaphysics…”

    http://www.academia.edu/245547/Enactivism_Why_be_Radical

    Of course Heraclitus, Heidegger, zen, Deleuze and Guattari came to mind, but also Bruce Lee.

    The eternal return I always think of Tim McGraw – Live Like You Were Dying
    “Like tomorrow was a gift,
    And you got eternity,
    To think about what you’d do with it.”

    “Like everyone else, you want to learn ‘The way to win.’ But never to accept ‘The way to lose.’ To accept defeat, to learn to die, is to be liberated from it. So when tomorrow comes, you must free your ambitious mind and learn ‘The Art of Dying.’”

    “In Science we have finally come back to the pre-Socratic philosopher Heraclitus, who said everything is flow, flux, process. There are no “things.” NOTHINGNESS in Eastern language is “no-thingness”. We in the West think of nothingness as a void, an emptiness, a nonexistence. In Eastern philosophy and modern physical science, nothingness — no-thingness — is a form of process, ever moving.”
    – Bruce Lee

    “The meaning of life is that it is to be lived, and it is not to be traded and conceptualized and squeezed into a pattern of systems.” – Bruce Lee

    “Life is better lived than conceptualized.” – Bruce Lee

    “Truth has no path. Truth is living and, therefore, changing.” – Bruce Lee

    “The man who is really serious, with the urge to find out what truth is, has no style at all. He lives only in what is.” – Bruce Lee

    http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bruce_Lee

    much respect

    Reply
  3. dmf says

    November 12, 2013 at 10:21 pm

    http://www.emersoncentral.com/amscholar.htm

    Reply
  4. MikeE says

    November 12, 2013 at 11:51 pm

    I listened to this late Monday night.
    I’ve been in a great mood all of Tuesday.
    The jury is still out over liability but I think that my testimony regarding how much so many
    of these ideas resonated with me should sway them.
    Excellent discussion.
    Thank you(s).

    Reply
  5. Billie Pritchett says

    November 13, 2013 at 6:15 am

    PEL Guys:

    I really enjoyed this podcast episode.

    I have two questions about Nietzsche’s claim about living dangerously and how a certain group of people will be able to live this way, perhaps in the future. Do you think that people living in the post-industrial world are in some respects inheritors of this view? I mean something like the high penchant for individualism, the search for meaning apart from religion, the appeal of libertarian ideals, and so on.

    And the next question I would have mainly for Wes: Do you find something sad psychologically about Nietzsche? Here’s a guy encouraging people to live dangerously, but he is in all likelihood quite normal, only just kind of quietly (through writing) raging against the machine. Plus, he talks about the new man having a taste for higher airs, which I’m sure is a metaphor, but also reminds me of the fact that Nietzsche himself seemed to have some kind of respiratory problem that made him prefer (literally) higher altitudes. How would you diagnose him?

    Reply
    • Wes Alwan says

      November 13, 2013 at 1:44 pm

      Hi Billie — I think Nietzsche saw his writing as the height of gay science and “living dangerously”; I think when Nietzsche talks of danger and heroism, he’s think of spiritual and intellectual danger and heroism. He’s not calling for us to become actual “robbers and conquerors,” or to return to being the “blond beasts” he describes in Genealogy. Rather, he’s asking us to incorporate heroic values into the life of the mind. Notice that his passages on heroic values often directly lead us back to just this: ” Be robbers and conquerors as long as you cannot be rulers and possessors, you seekers of knowledge!”

      Reply
  6. dmf says

    November 13, 2013 at 10:51 am

    things seem to get a little off track when Nietzsche’s take on love (eros not agape?) got turned into a kind of more rational-self-improvement imperative and I think lost the vital (pardon the pun) and even uncanny aspect of un-conscious-ness in that we fall into love (are possessed by loves/desires) and than can come to cultivate/appreciate such chthonic aspects of life, here I think he is close to Freud (yes I know that Freud read Nietzsche as did Jung) on the matters of sublimation and creative/artistic genius, not so
    democratic/inclusive/cosmopolitan as some like Dewey are.

    Reply
    • dmf says

      November 13, 2013 at 11:21 am

      FN is largely against tightassed puritanism and so being deadly-serious (or PC policing) would be anti-life, but being able to belly-laugh at yourself and at the other absurdities of life fits in my reading/writing of “gay” as enthusiastic.
      Pema Chodron strikes me as someone who is working on a contemplative life with a warrior ethos and a sense of humor:

      Reply
  7. C.-Derick-Varn says

    November 13, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    I always wondered where all the crypto-Kantianism I saw in Foucault came from, and indirectly, you guys have me an answer. Thanks.

    Reply
    • David Crohn says

      November 17, 2013 at 9:21 am

      I think also that whereas Kant saw the conditions for knowledge as contained in the mind, Foucault also saw them contained in the power structures of a person’s historical moment.

      Reply
  8. phil says

    November 15, 2013 at 11:50 am

    Great episode, thanks guys. Very insightful; Nietzsche was indeed a very fascinating philosopher.

    Reply
  9. Wayne Schroeder says

    November 16, 2013 at 7:16 pm

    An excellent podcast due to excellent convergence on the material in addition to the usual entertaining characters. Here’s an example of one of the numerous points of convergence and development of significantly abstract concepts from Nietzsche’s “Gay Science” (I think joyful is a better term than gay or cheerful) (@minute 46):

    Wes: “The Slave by being oppressed and having to look in upon himself and dissociate himself from what the Master is making him do gains a certain complexity and self consciousness that someone who’s just a Master, just in a position of power doesn’t have. ”

    Mark:” In Genealogy in Essay 2 on Bad Conscience it is the inward turning of instincts that actually carves out inside us the space that we call soul or psyche and he uses that phrase “makes us interesting.” We do not become human until we become oppressed and the instincts have to go inward, or there is no force to create a mind to create a spirit.”

    Where there are issues of divergence and difference among the group, the theme seems to focused on the question of what is Nietzsche’s ethic, what does he call good (correct ethic) or bad (bad ethic), and specifically, how do we categorize the psychopath?

    I think one more Nietzsche podcast on “Beyond Good and Evil” should clear this up.

    Nietzsche has spent a good amount of time clarifying the invalidity of slave morality, of guilt, of conscience, of God or self as arbiter. He is thoroughly pounding moralizing as establishing false truth, false value, false guilt, false conscience, false Gods of selves as arbiters, false masters, false slaves, all of which he dismisses under the label of “Good and Evil.”

    This tendency shows up when we try to apply false judgments (moralizing) anywhere. Psychopaths can be bad, but not Evil. A person can be as powerful as Napoleon, but not Evil (though he may use this term sarcastically). There is no such thing as Evil, and the attempt to impose the concept of Evil is precisely what Nietzsche is railing against as the great illusion of mankind.

    What then is a psychopath? Bad (not Evil). Who gets to ascribe bad? Individuals, but only out of their own discernment, not out of false moralizing, not appealing to some God (normative is not a good concept in Nietzsche’s project).

    Yes, even the bad must be affirmed (even though it is bad), as in the case of the psychopath who does great harm, but who is a product of the human condition, who would be you or me if we had endured the same conditions. Good and Bad are good, but Evil is really bad (as a concept).

    P.S. Thanks for illumination of the little known field of ethical philosophy know as fartology, or more formally as flatulentology 🙂

    Reply
  10. Josh says

    November 17, 2013 at 1:52 am

    Wes’ sibilants were like nails on a chalkboard after a certain point in this ep

    Reply
    • Wayne Schroeder says

      November 17, 2013 at 2:21 am

      Josh–
      They are not sibilants–they are not even related!

      On a slightly more serious note, perhaps you could just state what you like about Wes’s comments and what you disagreed with about the others. Thanks, Wayne

      Reply
      • Mark Linsenmayer says

        November 17, 2013 at 2:24 am

        He means his s’s; it’s an audio quality critique, probably caused by the EQ I had on his track and/or the noise reduction plugin. I’ll watch out for that; thanks, Josh.

        Reply
  11. J J says

    November 17, 2013 at 8:10 pm

    You guys desperately need to do an episode on Slavoj Zizek!… and an episode on Noam Chomsky too.

    Reply
  12. Leland Gregory says

    November 21, 2013 at 11:04 pm

    Some great pithy quotes you guys had there.

    Dylan: Something about “searching for truth yet being comfortable in uncertainty.”

    Wes: “The curtailment of instinct that comes with human society makes us sick.”

    Mark: I can’t find the exact quote but it’s the idea that being in the master morality is somehow limiting; the slave morality is forced to adapt and think of new values, to create. I think it’s kind of similar to class struggle, the ones who rise up are the ones who see the system as broken. If you’re rich and living the best life, you have no incentive to change anything, and that can be very limiting.

    Reply
  13. Donald Freeman says

    November 22, 2013 at 1:37 am

    Just wanted to add in case it was missed that Milan Kundera’s “Unbearable Lightness of Being” is a fantastic read in conjunction with this episode and this work.

    Reply
  14. Greg says

    November 24, 2013 at 12:09 pm

    Hey did you see these mini dialogues making fun of Plato’s socratic dialogues? I dunno where the first ones are though:

    http://voices.yahoo.com/the-lost-dialogues-plato-part-three-12133811.html?cat=2

    http://voices.yahoo.com/the-lost-dialogues-plato-part-four-12143660.html?cat=47

    http://voices.yahoo.com/the-lost-dialogues-plato-part-five-12144400.html?cat=47

    Reply
  15. now says

    June 24, 2014 at 2:46 am

    Nietzsche’s rejection of guilt is problematic in the context of psychopathy; although, if guilt is contrasted/compared w/ empathy and or sympathy it is perhaps less problematic. Nietzsche’s guilt is a social construct. sympathy/empathy could be quantify/qualified neurotically, hence on some level(conceding all as construct too) is emotional and a sensation. psychopathy, in other words could largely being the result of the physical body; the intellectual game of philosophy thus excluding psychopaths and idiots alike. Philosophy is inert in the first place in this context due the body’s physical structure.
    Nietzsche is exclusionary(admitting this him self i.e. the herd). Is not the psychopath unlike the herd with respect to inability? Could any given psychopath will them self into guilt/sympathy and the like?
    In summery; null question!

    Reply
  16. Evan says

    April 26, 2015 at 2:04 am

    If you take seriously the idea that each has their own path, which I do, then you can end up – like the Jungians I think – doing case studies. For the Jungians the unity is the collective unconscious, manifested through archetypes in the individual (I don’t find this convincing).

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Partially Naked Self-Examination Music Blog: “Take a Hike” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 11, 2013 at 12:08 pm

    […] Last year or so I got Steve to FTP me all the tracks and finally sat down to mix them specially for this episode. While it doesn’t exactly capture the spirit of Nietzsche’s “gay science,” […]

    Reply
  2. Partially Examined Life Ep. 84: Nietzsche’s | Research Material says:
    November 13, 2013 at 5:45 pm

    […] C Derick Varn I am beginning to realize thanks to Mark Linsenmayer and Seth Paskin, et al, that all the Kant I saw in Foucault was already in Nietzsche’s later writing. via Facebook http://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2013/11/11/ep84-nietzsche/ […]

    Reply
  3. Nietzsche and Schopenhauer Respond to Kant | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 19, 2013 at 9:28 am

    […] ep. 84 PEL touches briefly on Nietzsche’s criticism of Schopenhauer—or rather, the ways […]

    Reply
  4. Feeling Good About Oppression | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 24, 2013 at 9:48 pm

    […] the Nietzsche episode, I made a point relating Nietzsche’s “bright side” of slave morality with […]

    Reply
  5. Transcription – Nietzsche’s Gay Science Episode | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 27, 2013 at 9:54 am

    […] a quick note to let you know you know that we are making available a transcript from the Gay Science episode.  Special thanks to Jessica T. for her generous donation.  The file was Professionally […]

    Reply
  6. Academy of Ideas » Nietzsche Podcast on Partially Examined Life says:
    December 16, 2013 at 9:33 am

    […] http://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2013/11/11/ep84-nietzsche/ […]

    Reply
  7. The Partially Examined Nietzsche says:
    January 25, 2014 at 4:12 pm

    […] meantime. I’ll come back to it if I ever have a chance to treat it with a fine toothed comb. Take a listen. You can go here to find the full text of The Gay Science, which they’re discussing in […]

    Reply
  8. Conversation vs. Crossfire (Philosophy, Arrogance, and the David Brin Episode) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    March 28, 2014 at 9:31 am

    […] a word to those objecting to David for his “arrogance.” I thought reading Nietzsche was supposed to immunize one from getting riled up at this. If you think you’ve got anything […]

    Reply
  9. Topic for #94: Schopenhauer on Reading, Writing, and Thinking | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    May 11, 2014 at 8:44 am

    […] space, time, causality, material objects, all of that. So being really, really smart is not (as for Nietzsche) just being a slightly less dumb and more pretentious animal, but almost of attaining godhood: […]

    Reply
  10. Taking Back Dionysius | Society and Sports says:
    August 26, 2014 at 10:13 pm

    […] recommend, by the way – and going through old Nietzsche episodes they had done. The episodes on The Gay Science and The Genealogy of Morals mentioned Nietzsche’s use of Apollo and Dionysius, and that’s […]

    Reply
  11. Topic for #114: Schopenhauer on Will | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    April 24, 2015 at 6:01 pm

    […] character,” i.e. our own private Form. (Without buying into this as a metaphysical claim, Nietzsche could then take this as an inspirational call for us to “become […]

    Reply
  12. Topic for #127: John Dewey on Experience and Nature | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 15, 2015 at 10:23 am

    […] are themselves part of experience (i.e., another reflective object discoverable within it). Like Nietzsche, Dewey sees intellectual products (which are secondary objects, carefully refined) as revealing […]

    Reply
  13. Diving with Melville | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    December 1, 2015 at 7:29 am

    […] the novel as an expression of “inverted Platonism.” The phrase is apt, not least because Friedrich Nietzsche once characterized his own thought in precisely these terms, and Moby-Dick is a proto-Nietzschean […]

    Reply
  14. Weekly Thinker: Friedrich Nietzsche | says:
    May 15, 2016 at 12:51 am

    […] he did in fact first proclaim that with a roar in his 1882 work The Gay Science, it’s important to give equal attention to his critiques of morality, religion, and art, […]

    Reply
  15. Episode 140: De Beauvoir on the Ambiguous Human Condition (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    May 30, 2016 at 8:49 am

    […] also argues for the "self-legislation" of ethics. Other touchstones are Nietzsche (most centrally ep. 84), Camus (ep. 4), and especially Sartre (ep. 87). We also bring up Augustine (eps. 121 and 122), Eva […]

    Reply
  16. Episode 164: Dostoyevsky’s “The Idiot” on Perfection (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    May 15, 2017 at 7:00 am

    […] we're hearing D's actual view as opposed to one he's just playing out the implications of. Like Nietzsche, he certainly had a dim view of ordinariness, and saw the values as exhibited through status […]

    Reply
  17. On Integrative Encounters of the Cinematic Variety (Reflections on 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' on Its 40th Anniversary) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 8, 2017 at 1:55 am

    […] into the arts. This is the sort of synthesis of art and science that Nietzsche referred to as “joyful science.” And film—with its use of a multitude of technologies to combine word, sight, and […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Evan Hadkins on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in