• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 86: Thomas Kuhn on Scientific Progress

December 24, 2013 by Mark Linsenmayer 26 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_086_12-3-13.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:28:03 — 80.7MB)

On The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, published mostly in 1962.

Does scientific knowledge simply accumulate as we learn more and more, coming closer and closer to a full and truthful picture of the world? Kuhn says no! Instead, each scientific sub-culture has its own "paradigm," or model for what constitutes legitimate science, which includes what problems to study, what to counts as a result, some background assumptions, and other things nebulous enough that you really can't enumerate them. While Kuhn still believes that the movement to a new paradigm constitutes progress in a sense, the traditional picture of progressive science is still wrong.

Dylan enthuses at a weary Mark, Wes, and Seth over this fast and furious book, which is chock full of stories about phlogiston and all things mechanico-corpuscular. Read more about the topic and get the text. Listen to Dylan's introduction.

End song: "Retrogress" from The Fake Johnson Trio New & Improved EP (1996), remixed now with freshly re-recorded vocals.

Please support the podcast by becoming a PEL Citizen or making a donation.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: paradigm shifts, philosophy of science, philosophy podcast, Thomas Kuhn

Comments

  1. dmf says

    December 24, 2013 at 2:31 pm

    just what I wanted for xmas, thanks guys
    http://www.academia.edu/295508/Does_Thomas_Kuhn_Have_a_Model_of_Science

    Reply
    • dmf says

      December 24, 2013 at 3:00 pm

      http://threerottenpotatoes.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/stengers2011_pleaslowscience.pdf

      Reply
  2. Wayne Schroeder says

    December 26, 2013 at 10:04 am

    Kuhn made a nice first step at placing science in the context of the human, and addressing this concern of Nietzsche:

    “there is no “being” behind doing, working, becoming; “the doer” is a mere appanage [necessary accompaniment] to the action. The action is everything. In point of fact, the people duplicate the doing, when they make the lightning lighten, that is a “doing-doing”; they make the same phenomenon first a cause, and then, secondly, the effect of that cause. The scientists fail to improve matters when they say, “Force moves, force causes,” and so on. Our whole science is still, in spite of all its coldness, of all its freedom from passion, a dupe of the tricks of language, and has never succeeded in getting rid of that superstitious changeling “the subject” (the atom, to give another instance, is such a changeling, just as the Kantian “Thing-in-itself”). (Geneology of Morals, section 13 of the first essay.)

    Reply
  3. Wayne Schroeder says

    December 27, 2013 at 11:46 am

    When Kuhn made science a subject to study in its own right historically, he opened up the philosophical nature of science, much as Foucault made sexuality a study (History of Sexuality) and turned the history of sexuality into his own philosophy (of power.)

    What is interesting is that Kuhn was interested in philosophy enough to raise philosophical concerns such as perception, but not trained enough to flesh out the implications of his observations.

    I think that he both did well to respect science (he understood the value of probability in doing science vs Popper) while introducing the philosophical implications. He took a kind of phenomenological, geneaological, sociological approach to science, revealing its evolutionary meanderings and political nature and not just objective nature. “Paradigm” became the central terminology of his new assessment and reflects the newness and the limitation of his investigations. We need a new Kuhn to do for science what Foucault did for sexuality.

    Reply
    • dmf says

      December 27, 2013 at 9:12 pm

      ya mean like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Hacking ?

      Reply
      • Wayne Schroeder says

        December 28, 2013 at 12:09 am

        How cool. No sooner said than done, thanks to Ian Hacking. Looking forward to sorting through this. Thanks, dmf.

        Reply
        • dmf says

          December 30, 2013 at 6:24 pm

          sure thing, a good starting place might be:
          http://larvalsubjects.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/hacking-the-social-construction-of-what2.pdf

          Reply
  4. John Gavazzi says

    December 28, 2013 at 8:01 am

    Hi Guys!!

    Having taught Intro and Social Psych multiple times, the following site might be illustrative.

    http://www.theinvisiblegorilla.com/videos.html

    Best-

    Reply
  5. Gavin says

    December 29, 2013 at 5:41 am

    Hey all, enjoyed this podcast. Here’s an article on Kuhn’s influence from Ludwik Fleck, thought it might be worth sharing if you get a chance to check it out. It raises some interesting points on the origin of Kuhn’s use of the term ‘paradigm’ among other things. Looking forward to the next podcast!

    http://www.academia.edu/330971/From_Fleck_s_Denkstil_to_Kuhn_s_Paradigm_Conceptual_Schemes_and_Incommensurability

    Reply
  6. qapla says

    December 30, 2013 at 6:01 pm

    Yet another awesome episode and discussion. I repeatedly kept thinking back to this podcast:

    RS32 – Value-free Science?

    http://rationallyspeakingpodcast.org/show/rs32-value-free-science.html

    So I went back and listened to it again then re-listened to this episode.

    much respect

    Reply
  7. Adam says

    January 10, 2014 at 9:00 am

    Do a J Krishnamurti episode!

    (please)

    Reply
  8. Brian Falbo says

    February 28, 2014 at 12:57 am

    I finally got around to listening to the Kuhn episode. This work was one of the more influential in my own graduate studies and I was really interested in your various takes. Toward the end of the episode you (one of you three – I only recognize Seth’s voice uniquely) offered two criticisms that struck me: 1. that Kuhn’s insights are fairly obvious and therefore uncontroversial (and, therefore, implicitly brushed off) and 2. in reality all of the various paradigms, though serial, can be reconciled with one another. I think both criticisms dismiss much of Kuhn’s insight as to the social construction of science as an endeavor not subject to human construction. Modernism (so I hear) really did celebrate science as a transcendent endeavor, perhaps as a way to salvation from human imperfection in the search for Truth, and Kuhn’s insight was a more profound criticism of that view than I think you allow, especially for 1962. The second is a bit ironic because the implication is that science really is truth, and not human, because the modalities can always be internally reconciled. I think that criticism is probably contrary to Kuhn’s point as well as the evidence he cites.

    The Economist featured a cover story that I think illustrates the continuing relevance of Kuhn’s contributions. In the October 19 edition, “How Science Goes Wrong”, the article “Trouble in the Lab” highlights some of the very practical implications of Kuhn’s insights. The article begins by convincingly arguing that replication, the cornerstone of modern science, is actually quite rare and more practically difficult than generally recognized. Therefore studies and findings that may not be validated are often the basis for issuing grants, for government policy and funding decisions and, on a more individual basis, decisions on promotion and tenure. In Kuhn’s terms, the article may be an exploration of the triumph of the incentives prevailing for normal scientists, as well as a reiteration on how prevailing paradigms dictate the interpretation of data. Specific incentives include prizing “pioneering” work over replication in both grants and publication, the pressure on younger normal scientists to validate rather than negate findings, and the celebration of “surprising” results, which leads to disproportionate testing of surprising (that is, unlikely) hypotheses. The article illustrates how restricted access to data, to proprietary software, and to specialized knowledge exacerbates these incentives and colors the findings in many published studies, ultimately leading in some cases to a truism: a study isn’t truly validated until the same results are achieved.

    In short I think your podcast is awesome, but I also think that Kuhn’s work is more relevant to policy, to news coverage, and the social acceptance of scientific evidence than I would have gathered from the podcast alone. Thank you for another great episode!

    Reply
  9. John Pellow says

    April 6, 2014 at 9:53 pm

    Kuhn insists on the world-change impact of paradigm shifts. In my opinion he is overselling, but there is validity in what he asserts. If I were to insist the same thing, but add that the world change just is not always significant enough to affect things in a meaningful way, would I be correct in this position??

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Kuhn, Black Swans, and Antifragility | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    January 8, 2014 at 12:37 pm

    […] into the recent episode about Thomas Kuhn, the conversation settled into the apparent threat of relativism looming in Kuhn’s ideas. […]

    Reply
  2. Talking about world views - event mechanics says:
    January 11, 2014 at 10:50 pm

    […] the latest Partially Examined Life podcast on Thomas Kuhn’s notion of scientific progress Mark refers to the previous Deleuze and Guattari _What is Philosophy? podcast and makes a […]

    Reply
  3. Kuhn (Sort Of) Engages Traditional Epistemology | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    January 16, 2014 at 9:20 am

    […] commented in the episode, Kuhn doesn’t explicitly relate his insights about the history of science to more familiar […]

    Reply
  4. Foucault’s Precursor: Kuhn? | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    January 17, 2014 at 5:37 pm

    […] and how best to ask the most meaningful questions. Most importantly, both abandon what Mark in the podcast calls the “pre-philosophical” view of science as […]

    Reply
  5. Truth Without the Capital “T” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    January 20, 2014 at 12:59 pm

    […] I had to pick to most dominant theme in the discussion of Kuhn’s famous book, it would be the specter of relativism. The most controversial aspect […]

    Reply
  6. Sincerity. Sincerely. | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    February 2, 2014 at 10:27 am

    […] trap because he doesn’t allow for a more refined, flexible notion of sincerity. Recall Kuhn (Episode 86). Kuhn points out (far from the first to do so) that the development of new scientific ideas, […]

    Reply
  7. Freedom and Taste | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    February 10, 2014 at 11:05 am

    […] these words make no sense except as descriptions of one’s own reaction to a work. Like Kuhn’s paradigms, they can’t speak to each other. (Of course, Kuhn was not a solipsist; paradigms were joint, […]

    Reply
  8. Topic for #92 (and a Not School Group): Henri Bergson | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    March 20, 2014 at 11:28 am

    […] of consciousness, we can come up with these models, and in fact all the really ground breaking (paradigm shifting) science does involve metaphysics in this way; however, we can’t get from the models back to […]

    Reply
  9. Precognition of Ep. 86: Thomas Kuhn | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 15, 2015 at 10:27 am

    […] Read more about the topic and get the book. Listen to the episode. […]

    Reply
  10. Topic for #129: Is Religious Faith Rational? | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    December 13, 2015 at 9:48 pm

    […] Basil Mitchell “Faith and Criticism” (1994). Mitchell considers W.K. Clifford's principle “It is wrong, always, everywhere and for everyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” and, like Plantinga, considers how our other everyday judgments would fare against that strict criterion. Drawing on inspiration from John Henry Newman, Mitchell instead tries to give some observations about how reasoning actually works: Much of reasoning is tacit and informal, the accumulation of probabilities. Estimating the force of evidence is always influenced by antecedent assumptions (this is the hermeneutic circle, which you can hear us talk about in discussing Gadamer and then in a specifically religious context about Ricoeur). Finally, we need stability in these assumptions over time, and don't just change our whole world-view in light of new evidence. He compares this to paradigms in science that persist and just consider such new evidence one of the problems that the paradigm has to deal with (listen to us talk about Thomas Kuhn on scientific paradigms). […]

    Reply
  11. The Ship of Theseus and “The Outer Limits of Reason” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    June 23, 2016 at 7:01 am

    […] necessary consequences of one system, or invoking multiple incommensurable systems (to use Thomas Kuhn's vocabulary), will produce insoluble contradictions, and thus […]

    Reply
  12. Episode 163: Guest Stewart Umphrey on Natural Kinds (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    May 1, 2017 at 7:20 am

    […] that reject this kind of metaphysics, covering folks like Nelson Goodman, Whitehead, Dewey, and Kuhn (in addition to […]

    Reply
  13. Episode 173: Relating to American Indian Philosophy (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    October 12, 2017 at 12:03 pm

    […] over abstract principle: According to Burkhart, American Indian thought lacks a paradigm in Kuhn's sense. We aren't supposed to come at the world with a preconceived framework for what is and isn't […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in