• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Philosophy of Law Not-School Report: Aquinas, MLK, and Equality

January 7, 2014 by Dan Johnson 1 Comment

[From new-to-us blogger and PEL Citizen Dan Johnson]

Natural law seems like a relic, remembered only by Catholics who use it as thin grounds for odd sexual theories: the evil of condoms, the intrinsic disorder of homosexuals.   Undeterred, our  Not School Philosophy of Law group decided to take a look at this relic, including selections from Aquinas and Martin Luther King.  It turns out to provide some interesting foundations for our constitutional principle of equal protection of law.  That may sound surprising, since equal protection is the primary basis for the string of recent court decisions in favor of gay marriage, yet natural law is portrayed as the enemy of such equality.  But hear me out.

Here’s a paraphrase of Aquinas’ key syllogisms:

Premise: Law consists of rules.

Premise: Rules are selected by the faculty of reason.  (That is, people can figure out what patterns of behavior they should follow in order to achieve their long term goals.)

Conclusion:  Law is selected by the faculty of reason. (ST I-II, Q. 90, Art. 1.)

Premise: Law is selected by the faculty of reason.

Premise: Things selected by faculty of reason are selected for the purpose of obtaining human happiness.  (In other words, whenever you decide to follow some pattern of behavior, you must have some overarching goal in mind.  Moreover, by pursuing those goals, you're trying to fulfill your full potential as a human being.)

Conclusion: Laws are selected for the purpose of obtaining human happiness.  (ST I-II, Q. 90, Art. 2.)

Premise: Laws are selected for the purpose of obtaining human happiness.

Premise: Obtaining each individual’s happiness requires obtaining the happiness of the individual’s whole community.  (Think of it this way… Each person is a part of a larger whole, the community.  As a result, each person can reach their potential only with the support of a fully-fuctional community, yet the community cannot be fully functional unless each person reaches his or her potential.)

Conclusion: To achieve their purpose, laws must further the happiness of the whole community.   (ST I-II, Q. 90, Art. 2.)

Premise: To achieve their purpose, laws must further the happiness of the whole community.

Premise: Obtaining happiness for the whole community ideally involves the participation of the whole community, since the best judge of how to be happy is the person or people seeking that happiness.  (I take it that’s what Aquinas means when saying, “the directing of anything to the end concerns him to whom the end belongs.”)

Conclusion: To achieve their purpose, laws must be chosen with the participation of the whole community.  (ST I-II, Q. 90, Art. 3.)

Aquinas isn’t terribly clear, so maybe this paraphrase is off base.  But maybe he isn’t just some anti-condom goofball.  Maybe Aquinas instead lays the philosophical foundation for the democratic principle that everyone should be treated equally under law.

Indeed, Martin Luther King appears to assume such a reading of Aquinas in his famous letter from a Birmingham jail, where King paraphrases Aquinas:

A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God.  An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law.  To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law [i.e., a law not conducive to happiness].  Any law that uplifts human personality is just.  Any law that degrades the human personality is unjust.

From these principles, King concludes, “All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality.”  Reflecting Aquinas’ concern that law serve the entire community, King states, “An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself.”  Reflecting Aquinas’ concern for the participation of the entire community in law-making, King says, “A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law.  Who can say that the legislature of Alabama which set up that state’s segregation law was democratically elected?”  Perhaps Aquinas didn’t intend these conclusions, or couldn’t have foreseen them, but they do appear to follow from his principles.

This January, our Not School Philosophy of Law group will be doing another set of readings, this time on legal positivism (Hume, Bentham, Hart, etc.).  Please join us!

--Dan Johnson

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in