• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Sartre’s “Nausea” Discussion Now Posted For Citizens

January 30, 2014 by Mark Linsenmayer 2 Comments

On Sunday I had a discussion with Sean Webb, Stan Martin, and Yannick Kilberger about Sartre's novel Nausea (1938), which you can download from the Citizen Free Stuff page. If you're not yet a Citizen, sign up to get access to this file and more than a dozen other discussions.

Moreso than Sartre's philosophical work, a novel like this is supposed to tell us what existentialism is really all about, and sure enough, we get the narrator Roquentin feeling the raw existence of his surroundings: "existence which unceasingly renewed itself and which was never born" (p. 132). What seems to happen is that while ordinarily we see objects as meaningful, e.g. as tools, as decoration, as things with history and often purpose, we can set that aside and see things instead as brute and meaningless. We can't handle that, aren't meant to handle that, and so instead of this being a machine-like, unemotional way of experiencing things, it is (for Roquentin) intolerably icky.

So before he figures this out (and spells it out for us), we get 80+ pages of him just walking around the French city of Bouville having variations on this experience of slipping: of his own perceptions slipping away from the usual, engaged type that doesn't look too hard. We get a few hints in his observations of others of "bad faith," but no real diagnosis of the protagonist himself. Is he sick? In bad faith? Is he doing phenomenology for us, showing us what all of us can see if we adopt this viewpoint which is somehow primal or important? He eventually has a couple of conversations so we can compare and contrast his view with others: a self-proclaimed humanist, and then his ex-girlfriend who's had similar experiences, also feeling that she's "outlived herself" and can no longer find life dramatic and engaging. Roquentin is not able to personally connect with either of these people, but we get some hope at the end that we may be able to sort of connect with others sympathetically through art.

Despite its gorgeous language, vivid imagery, and some philosophical interest, it's still a hard slog, and we all felt pretty proud of ourselves for getting through it. Go listen to the discussion so you won't have to read it yourself!

For February, I'll be leading a group on Anscombe's book Intention. Come join us!

-Mark Linsenmayer

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Matthew (Bibliofreak.net) says

    August 11, 2015 at 6:50 am

    I agree that this was an opportunity for Sartre to make some of his philosophies more personal. It works to an extent, but at times I think the text gets so bogged down in Roquentin’s particular melancholy that it loses some of the universal discussion that it could have engaged in. Still something I look back on fondly as being one of the first existential novels I read (I guess I’m not alone there).

    My review: Nausea by Jean-Paul Sartre

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Not School Digest #4: Sartre, Heidegger, Zizek, Marx, etc. | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    May 1, 2017 at 11:13 am

    […] from PEL podcaster & listener discussions on Sartre's Nausea, Heidegger's "The Question Concerning Technology," Slavoj Zizek's Year of Dreaming Dangerously, […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in