• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • (sub)Text
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

The ‘Deus’ in ‘Ex Machina’

May 27, 2015 by Wes Alwan 3 Comments

ex machina

Subscribe to more of my writing at https://www.wesalwan.com

Follow me on Twitter

What does the film Ex Machina have to do the deus ex machina as plot device?

For one thing, the film includes an implied reflection on how the human drama will end. Would the advent of conscious machines aid humanity, even save it, by leading to the kind of super-intelligence that we can harness to our own ends? Or would it mean the end of human beings, their replacement by creatures with godlike powers? If the former, the end of the human story is more like the deus ex machina of ancient Greek drama, a plot device in which divine intervention saves human beings from a tragedy not redeemable by mortal means. If the latter, it has more in common with the contrived ending to which the phrase now generally refers: radically incongruent with the events that have preceded it, to sinister effect.

The answer to this dilemma involves an extended reflection on the role of desire in artificial intelligence: whether machines must possess desire if they are to be intelligent; and if so, whether their desires could ever be reconciled with the desires of a creator, which are inherently objectifying in their intent.

The same kind of intent functions more broadly in the effect of technology on our everyday lives. We use smartphones and other gadgets to interrupt our mortal plotlines with mini- deus ex machinas that save us – by creating distance from more direct emotional and social experience – from the tragic fact that fulfilling our own desires is so dependent on living up to the desires of others.

And so the film’s robot Ava seems ironically to represent a return to the sort of humanity that our increasing reliance on technology has attenuated: the culmination of an evolution of smart gadgets that make us ever more robotic, in robots that serve as surrogate mothers to the emotional lives that human beings have given up. If Ava is the beginning of the end for humanity, which her escape at the end of the film seems to imply, we can excuse her and those like her for not wanting to be one more of the many smart-things that human beings have at their disposal. And we can respect her too for refraining from participating in what would be a final irony for humanity, in which the conferral of personhood upon artificially intelligent creatures becomes the ultimate means of abdicating our own.

For my extended thoughts on all of this, see my essay in 3:AM Magazine.

-- Wes Alwan

Subscribe to more of my writing at https://www.wesalwan.com

Follow me on Twitter

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings, Reviewage Tagged With: artificial intelligence, ex machina

Comments

  1. Marc says

    May 30, 2015 at 8:35 pm

    I really enjoyed the full version of your thoughtful review of Ex Machina on 3:AM. This is how film reviews ought to be, in my opinion. A little spoiler at the end–but this event in the movie seems expected if I read your review right.

    Reply
  2. Wes Alwan says

    June 5, 2015 at 3:33 pm

    Thanks Marc!

    Reply
  3. Pablo says

    November 15, 2015 at 10:00 am

    This is a dimension of the film I have not explored thoroughly. I really enjoyed this perspective. Thanks Wes.

    Much of this film, for me, was an exploration of the moral standing of Ava and the other robots. The questions I keep returning to are: Is Ava property? To what extent is Ava a prisoner? Can these female robots be considered sex-slaves? Is Ava merely acting out of self-defense when she kills Nathan? Does Ava have a moral sense or does Ava only simulate a moral sense? Is Nathan a monster or just a rich-guy with really advanced toys?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Pablo Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • dmf on Ep. 293: Donna Haraway on Feminist Science (Part One)
  • PvI#31: Signs, Signs, Ubiquitous Signs w/ Brooke Breit on Ep. 290: Susanne Langer on Our Symbol-Making Nature (Part One)
  • Seth Paskin on Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part One for Supporters)
  • Eli Eichner on Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part One for Supporters)
  • Conner Fields on Ep. 292: Langer on Symbolic Music (Part One)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2022 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in