• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Science, Technology, and Society XIV: Ian Hacking

July 2, 2015 by Daniel Halverson 2 Comments

This post in the fourteenth and last in a series on Science, Technology, and Society. The previous post in the series is here. All posts in the series have previously appeared on the Partially Examined Life group page on Facebook.

When someone speaks of the social construction of X, you have to ask, X = what?

Ian Hacking (1936 – ) is a Canadian philosopher, historian of science, and an advocate of scientific realism. In The Social Construction of What? (1999), he argued that constructionist accounts of scientific theories tend to lose sight of a basic question: What, exactly, is it that’s supposed to be constructed?

If we consider the case of gravity, for instance, we can distinguish at least two different meanings for the word. Gravity can either be (1) that nonverbalized property of reality that is responsible for objects falling down when tossed up, etc., or it can be (2) the verbalized theory of that property advanced by Isaac Newton in 1687. If we ask, “Is gravity socially constructed?” then the meaning of both the question and the answer depend very much on which definition we're using. If we mean gravity (1), then the answer is almost certainly “no.” If we mean gravity (2), the answer is obviously “yes.” The first criticism is absurd, the second banal. “Is gravity socially constructed?” is, for Hacking, simply a bad question. We need to be more specific.

The theory could have been different if Newton had been a different person or if it had been created in a different place, but in so much as competing theories about gravity accurately describe it, they will tend inevitably to converge toward a fixed point. There are many perspectives on reality, but there is only one reality to be described. The process of science is a process of refinement; the better a theory is, the less integral its “socially constructed” aspects become. The equations given by Newton describe the real properties of gravity, as they really are, as we really experience them in our daily lives.

This position places Hacking near the middle of the spectrum on philosophy of science, though certainly on the realist side of it. A thoroughgoing realist, who is committed to the literal truth of scientific theories, cannot maintain that (1) and (2) are different in any meaningful way, because if Newton’s theory is correct, then it is nothing other than the verbalization of a property of the universe. To the extent that it is anything else (“constructed” rather than “discovered”) it is a false theory. On the other hand, Hacking regards externalist sociological approaches to the history of science as unduly skeptical. We are justified in believing that the things described by theories really do exist, substantially as described, because we can do things with them. Hume notwithstanding, inference to the best explanation is the best method we have, and we should stick with it.

Daniel Halverson is a graduate student studying the history of Science, Technology, and Society of nineteenth-century Germany. He is also a regular contributor to the PEL Facebook page.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: PEL's Notes Tagged With: ian hacking, philosophy blog, philosophy of science, scientific realism

Comments

  1. Nancy McClernan says

    July 8, 2015 at 2:52 pm

    If you engage with Daniel Halverson on Facebook, just make sure you don’t disagree with him too vehemently or he will block you. Not that I mind not having his passive-aggressiveness in promoting postmodernism in my face constantly.. But I find his refusal to tolerate disagreement objectionable since he seems to be an approved contributor of The Partially Examined Life.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Science, Technology, and Society XIII: The Sokal Hoax | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 7, 2015 at 10:11 am

    […] on Science, Technology, and Society. The previous post in the series is here, and the next one is here. All posts in the series have previously appeared on the Partially Examined Life group page on […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in