• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • All PEL Episodes
    • Most Recent Episodes
    • Categorized by Topic
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Upcoming Episodes
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Store
    • Cart
    • Checkout
  • Members
    • Membership Options
    • PEL Not School Introduction
    • Log In
  • Support PEL
    • Patreon
  • Write for Us
  • Contact

Philosophy of History Part XV: What Is Historicism?

October 23, 2015 by Daniel Halverson 4 Comments

ClockHistoricism is a somewhat obscure term, but one does occasionally encounter it in philosophy, and especially in discussions about the theory and nature of history, so I thought it might be worthwhile to pause for a moment and discuss it.

Historicism is the view, first advanced by Giambattista Vico, and later rediscovered (apparently independently) by German historians, that there does not exist any extra-historical perspective on which judgments about people or ideas can be grounded. Put another way, there is no such thing as a “general category,” a “universal principle,” or “human nature” inherent in reality itself—there are only individual objects, individual people, and their interpretations of reality, where reality is conceived of as one enormous, unconquerable brute fact, about which we can entertain notions, but cannot have knowledge.

Giambattista Vico arrived at his philosophy by inverting Descartes, whose universalism and rationalism he opposed. According to Descartes, mathematics is the outstanding example of reason, on which all serious thought should be based. This is because everything follows logically and necessarily from a few self-evident axioms, and because a mathematical relation admits of definite and fixed variables—in other words, because mathematics is not a matter of interpretation, but of necessity. For Descartes, this is the structure of the universe, which the philosopher should emulate by so structuring his own thought.

Vico agreed that knowledge of mathematics was certain, but he contested the claim that this was because of a necessary relationship to the universe. On the contrary, he insisted that knowledge of mathematics was certain because it was created by human beings. Thus to Descartes’s “cogito ergo sum,” from which everything else in his system was derived, he proposed an alternative: “verum factum,” or “the true is the made.” Human knowledge can only be of those things that humans have created—but because God is the creator of the universe, only God knows that. (It may be worthwhile to recall that Descartes also believed in God, and indeed thought he had proven his existence through logical deduction; it would be a mistake to see their dispute in terms of religion.)

This view was revived by Johann Herder, GWF Hegel, and Leopold von Ranke in the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth century, became the basis of German historical scholarship throughout the century, and even occasionally produced philosophers such as Wilhelm Dilthey and Karl Marx. It was not seriously challenged in Germany until after the close of the Second World War.

Historicists agree that human beings are products of history, and that their values and knowledge necessarily rest on a contingent and somewhat mysterious process. However, they do not necessarily agree about the implications of this principle. In general, they can be thought of as falling along a spectrum, with historicists of a more skeptical turn denying the possibility of any knowledge of history (and hence of the world) except that arrived at “from the inside,” and those with a more daring spirit who believe that reason can “pull itself up by its own bootstraps,” to use Hayek’s phrase. The latter group believes, in other words, that knowledge of the contingent nature of knowledge is in fact a kind of noncontingent knowledge, from which other kinds of knowledge can potentially be leveraged. Vico, Hegel, and Ranke fall into the first group, Marx and Karl Mannheim into the second.

Although historicism originally developed, as we have said, as a counter-move to Cartesian rationalism, and was picked up, as we have said elsewhere, by the German historical profession for political as well as for philosophical purposes in the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars, as the nineteenth century wore on, it tended to merge with one of the most important successors to Cartesian rationalism—the sociology of the French positivists St. Simon and Auguste Comte, who advocated scientific socialism as a means of administering the state. This view was picked up, expanded, and popularized by Karl Marx, who believed that he had discovered laws that govern history in more or less the same way that Newton’s laws govern physics or Darwin’s biology.

The philosophy of Karl Marx thus became the most widely known form of historicism, although, as we have said, it was not very representative. Most historicists were not positivists—they did not believe, as Marx did, that history could be understood as a mechanism, that it was governed by deterministic laws, or that reason could “lift itself up by its own bootstraps” (to quote Hayek) in order to acquire an extra-historical vantage point, and they certainly were not socialists, since historicism began as a conservative political doctrine. But because Marx was so influential, he created a major strand within historicism. This is the strand that Karl Popper and Friedrich Hayek attacked in their “anti-historicist” work of the 1940s and 1950s.

This post is the fifteenth is a series on the philosophy of history; the previous article in the series is here, the next one is here.

Daniel Halverson is a graduate student studying the history of Science and Technology of nineteenth-century Germany. He is also a regular contributor to the PEL Facebook page.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: Giambattista Vico, historicism, philosophy blog, philosophy of history

Comments

  1. Kurt Houwen says

    November 21, 2015 at 4:56 pm

    So if I am reading this right, Historicism started out as a philosophically descriptive endeavor to counter Universalism and Rationalism (and other objective metaphysical views), and contrast that with a more subjective view of the judgement of people and ideas. But then historicists, like Marx, made it more of normative/prescriptive endeavor?

    Reply
  2. V Green says

    May 17, 2017 at 9:44 am

    It is a mistake ti align Karl Marx with historicism (rather than critical historicism) and to refer to him as a positivist, which he wasn’t. Nor did Marx think ‘that history could be understood as a mechanism, that it was governed by deterministic laws’. This is naive view, perpetrared by deliberate misrepresentations of Marx by people like Karl Popper. Marx’s uses a polemic of ‘iron laws’ of history in his critique of capitalism but his analysis of history in his wrirings is far from deterministic.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Philosophy of History Part XIV: Friedrich Nietzsche: History as Art | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    October 23, 2015 at 4:19 pm

    […] This post is the fourteenth is a series on the philosophy of history; the previous article in the series is here, the next is here. […]

    Reply
  2. Philosophy of History Part XVI: The Collapse of Civilization in Europe, 1914–1945 | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 3, 2015 at 7:01 am

    […] This post is the sixteenth is a series on the philosophy of history; the previous article in the series is here.  […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Buy the 2018 PEL Calendar
Become a PEL Citizen

Recent Comments

  • Using Early Access Astroneer to deal with the Singularity | EPIC Loot Drop on Episode 108: Dangers of A.I. with Guest Nick Bostrom
  • Nick Johnson on Episode 32: Heidegger: What is “Being?” (Citizens Only)
  • Athena Sophia Speculi Ustorii on “Privilege” Is Not a Causal Claim
  • Kai Whiting and Leonidas Konstantakos on Life-Hack Stoicism—Is It Worth It?
  • Elijah on Life-Hack Stoicism—Is It Worth It?

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • Aftershow
  • Audiobook
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • New Books in Philosophy
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | iTunes

Copyright © 2009 - 2018 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy