• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Philosophy of History Part XXIV: Fernand Braudel and the Annales School

February 4, 2016 by Daniel Halverson 1 Comment

I remember a night near Bahia when I was enveloped in a firework display or phosphorescent fireflies; their pale lights glowed, went out, shone again, all without piercing the night with any true illumination. So it is with events; beyond their glow, darkness prevails. –Fernand Braudel

Fernand Braudel (1902–1985) was a French historian and a leader of the Annales School (c. 1929–1980), an anthropological approach to history that eschewed the normal emphasis on narrative, politics, and the lives of the great and powerful. Instead it combined geography, sociology, and economics with history in order to create a new and distinctively French school of historical writing. Although it is no longer an active research program, it was probably been the most broadly influential approach to history created in the twentieth century. Other prominent members included Lucien Febvre, Marc Bloch, Jacques Le Goff, and Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie.

Braudel was born in Luméville, a village about halfway between Paris and the Belgian border, the son of a math teacher. He became a history teacher in Algeria (then a French colony) during the ’20s, and spent much of the ’30s founding Sao Paulo’s first university. When the war broke out, he was drafted into the army, and was later captured by the Wehrmacht during the Battle for France (1940.) He spent the rest of the war in a detention camp, where he wrote most of the work that would make him famous: The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II (1949.)

“I was at the beginning and I remain now an historian of peasant stock,” he said. The France he knew as a child—of small towns, seasonal rhythms, and ancestral traditions—influenced everything he wrote. In The Mediterranean World he wanted to tell the story of people who had been written out of the history books—people like his friends and neighbors in Luméville. Where the histories of Ranke and Marx were both elitist in their own ways, concentrating on people who “matter” in history, Braudel’s was explicitly the story of people who “didn’t matter” in history: the peasants. As a prisoner of war in a Nazi detention camp, he was forced to watch helplessly as the great and powerful ruined a once-proud civilization, and slaughtered the little people in their millions. There had to be more to history than the awful spectacle of folly, ambition, and carnage, repeated generation after generation—otherwise, it would be too grim to bear.

Concentrating on the lives of the “little people” was one way to get out of this perspective. Another was to think of space and time differently. The title of his history reflects his emphasis on the role of geography in history, and not simply in the sense of aiding or obstructing people’s immediate purposes. Rather, he understood the role of geography as determining certain behaviors, which, over generations, became traditions, attitudes, and habits. Thus there is an underlying geographic unity to any region, based, not on proximity or contiguity, but rather of climate and topography, which produces similar traditions, attitudes, and habits in places that may be very distant in terms of their culture, political allegiance, or physical proximity. On this view, a Catholic peasant living in the Pyrenees may have a great deal in common with an Ottoman peasant living in the Taurus Mountains on the other side of the Mediterranean, even though he speaks a different language, follows a different religion, and lives under a different empire. He may, in fact, have more in common with his Ottoman counterpart than he has with a peasant living just a few hundred miles away along the banks of the Rhone, cultural similarities notwithstanding. But all of them will have more in common with each other than with a peasant living on the shores of the Baltic, because the climate of the Mediterranean and the Baltic are so different from each other. In order to understand the role of geography in history, Braudel argued, we need to think of it in terms of its effects for people’s habitual outlooks, not just its effects on their immediate purposes. Further, we need to stand the traditional account of history on its head. Geography is not a footnote to events; on the contrary, it is events that are the footnote to geography.

Similarly, for Braudel, it was not the prosaic sense of time that mattered, but the way people thought about time. If we think of our own lives, for instance, we have a very peculiar sense of time. For most of us, it means the schedule and the clock: time to wake, time to work, time to relax, time to sleep. We never really separate ourselves from the schedule, at best we forget about it for a few hours on a Sunday afternoon, or for maybe even a few whole days if we go camping. But usually we don’t even do that. As soon as we pick up our cell phone or talk to a friend, it’s only a matter of time before someone brings up the digits that, for us, signify the passage of time. When that happens, the schedule comes crashing back in, and we recall that we have to do a certain thing at a certain time on a certain day, or else a certain other thing that we want to avoid will happen. We live the vast majority of our lives “on the clock,” in a metaphorical or a literal sense.

The world of the sixteenth-century peasant was a world in which this concept did not, and could not, exist. She had no clocks and no appointments. For her, time meant the rhythms of life, the seasons, and tradition—sunrise and sunset; marriage, birth, and death; spring, summer, fall, and winter; the rituals of the Church and the holy days of the sacred calendar. It was the same for her as it had been for her mother and grandmother, and as it would be for her daughter and granddaughter, stretching off endlessly across an ocean of time forever. According to Braudel, traditional, event-driven histories conceive of time as the courte durée, or the short term. To capture the perspective of a sixteenth-century peasant, Braudel introduced the concept of the longue durée: an epoch, characterized not by change but by continuity.

These continuities of time and space worked together to create a mentalité, or characteristic way of thinking, feeling, and living. Just what the mentalité of the Mediterranean may have been, Braudel did not address in detail. He ignored religion—rather oddly, in an age of holy war and pious slaughter. He did not address another oft-mentioned characteristic of Mediterranean culture, the honor-shame complex. Indeed, we learn much of the lives, but surprisingly little of the outlook, of his Mediterranean peasants.

His fellow Annalists devoted much more time to this subject. In Centuries of Childhood (1960), Philippe Ariès argued that childhood as we know it—as a special phase of life characterized by curiosity, innocence, and playfulness—was the invention of the seventeenth-century. Before that time, “children” were regarded more or less as stupid dwarves, and did not really become “people” in the social sense of the word until puberty. In a similar vein, in The Royal Touch (1929) Marc Bloch explored the widespread belief, in medieval England and France, that a king could cure his subjects of diseases. In Montaillou: Promised Land of Error (1975), Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie (subject of a future article) combed through church records of a small town in southern France in order to reconstruct an entire way of life in that one place, c. 1325. In all of these histories it was not the event, or the person, but the mentalité that took center stage.

The Annales School was based on a social sciences approach to history that has fallen out of favor with the rise of postmodernism and the declining confidence of historians to recover an objectively true account of the past. However, its redefinition of the perimeters of historical inquiry has remained hugely influential. Historians think more broadly, and more deeply, about their craft as a result of their work.

This post is the twenty-fourth is a series on the philosophy of history; the previous article in the series is here, the next is here.

Daniel Halverson is a graduate student studying the History of Science and Technology of nineteenth-century Germany. He is also a regular contributor to the PEL Facebook page.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: Annales School, Fernand Braudel, philosophy of history

Comments

  1. Jacques Barbe says

    February 4, 2020 at 12:33 pm

    How about Fernand Braudel and Oswald Spengler ? Anything in common in their approach to history?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Theo on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two)
  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in