• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 142: Plato’s “Phaedrus” on Love and Speechmaking

June 27, 2016 by Mark Linsenmayer 8 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_142_6-5-16.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 2:09:49 — 118.9MB)

Plato by Solomon GrundySocrates hangs out in the country flirting with his buddy Phaedrus. And what is this "Platonic" love you've all heard about? Well, you use the enticement of desire not to rush toward fulfillment, but to get all excited about talking philosophy.

Phaedrus starts off reading a speech by renowned orator Lysias (actually Plato's invention parodying the style of this real guy) about love: Love is a form of madness, where people do things they then regret after love fades. Therefore, it's better to hang out with someone who does NOT love you, i.e., some friend who's concerned with your interests instead of fulfilling his addled desires.

Socrates critiques both this position and the speech itself. We get to learn about what makes for a good persuasive speech (one point: don't put the sentences in random order!) and see both how Socrates would make the same point Lysias does but better, and then what Socrates's true view and preferred presentation is: This takes the form of a long myth that involves a chariot, and the structure of the soul, and how beauty causes us to remember a heavenly world. And after all this, we get to hear more about rhetoric and how back-and-forth, in-person philosophical exchange is way better than reading books.

Mark, Wes, and Dylan are joined by Great Discourses founder Adam Rose, who provides us with a lot of nice literary context.

Buy the text or follow along in this online version.

Related Episodes: Folks may want to listen to our past Plato episodes on The Symposium (on love), Gorgias (on rhetoric), and The Republic (on what's wrong with poetry and the structure of the soul).

End song: "Summertime" by New People, from Might Get It Right (2013).

Plato picture by Solomon Grundy.

Please support PEL!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: love, Phaedrus, philosophy podcast, Plato, rhetoric, Socrates

Comments

  1. Wayne Schroeder says

    June 28, 2016 at 11:16 pm

    Interesting episode raising the following observations:
    1) Plato was much more comfortable with integrating the rational (logos) and the nonrational (“muthos”), than I thought.

    Plato’s Myths (from SEP):
    For the ancient Greeks, myth was not a false belief which we believe today, but “muthos” was a true story that unveils the true origin of the world and human beings. In opposition to the memorable being transmitted orally through poetry in ancient Greece, in the seventh century BC, two opponents to poetry developed: history (shaped notably by Thucydides) and philosophy shaped by the naturalistic tradition of the sixth and fifth centuries. Plato thus broke from these naturalistic traditions by using both traditional myths and myths he invented himself, attempting to overcome the “muthos”/logos dichotomy.

    2) These themes of objective truth (divine madness and eternal forms) versus subjective truth (human madness and lover obsession) came to the fore with Kierkegaard who existentially raised subjective truth as no less valid than the rational truth espoused by Hegel’s dialectics of thesis, antithesis, new synthesis, and replaced it with his own dialectic of aesthetic, ethical, and synthesis with the religious (when he became a Christian existentialist). These dialectics were much different than Plato’s dialectics which were more about dialogue.

    3) Mental insemination is a little over the top, but I do agree that true interpersonal dialogue, even if it is philosophical, is a much higher form of human interaction than written attempts at dialogue or especially a prepared written monologue. That being said, each has its place. In Derridian fashion, any privileged term is subject to deconstruction by its opposite.

    4) Plato was the poet-philosopher, just like Nietzsche. It’s not poetry that’s bad, but bad poetry that’s bad.

    5) Chariots of Fire: nice parallel with Freudian tripartite psyche.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. scubawall.com says:
    June 28, 2016 at 11:19 pm

    scubawall.com

    Episode 142: Plato’s “Phaedrus” on Love and Speechmaking (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog

    Reply
  2. Episode 142: Plato’s “Phaedrus” on Love and Speechmaking (Part Two) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    July 4, 2016 at 1:06 am

    […] to part 1 first, or get the ad-free, unbroken Citizen Edition with your PPEL Citizenship, which also gets you […]

    Reply
  3. Deinotes: Dread, Wonder, and the Art of Persuasion | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 2, 2016 at 9:15 am

    […] our latest post), people came to believe that provided an orator had powerful words, he could reach psychagógia (the primary persuasive function of rhetoric) regardless of evidence or reason. With Plato, […]

    Reply
  4. How Plato’s “Phaedrus” Influenced Thomas Mann’s “Death in Venice” | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    August 28, 2016 at 10:42 pm

    […] of ethics, psychology, and aesthetics, the novella also manages to reference Nietzsche and Plato while making us empathize with someone who some might (crudely) just call a […]

    Reply
  5. PMP-Partially Examined Life Crossover: Neil Postman’s “Amusing Ourselves to Death” says:
    April 27, 2021 at 10:11 am

    […] which means there’s a lot more name-dropping about philosophers like Plato, who argued in the Phaedrus against writing, which he said amounts to off-loading thought to this inert thing, when it should […]

    Reply
  6. Has TV Rotted Our Minds? On Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death (A Pretty Much Pop Culture Podcast/Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast Crossover) – Fly Daily News says:
    April 29, 2021 at 3:37 am

    […] Pretty Much Pop discussion. Plato, for example, argued (through the character of Socrates) in the Phaedrus against writing, which he said amounts to off-loading thought to this inert thing, when it should […]

    Reply
  7. Has TV Rotted Our Minds? On Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death (A Pretty Much Pop Culture Podcast/Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast Crossover) – daily-stop says:
    April 29, 2021 at 4:08 am

    […] Pretty Much Pop discussion. Plato, for example, argued (through the character of Socrates) in the Phaedrus against writing, which he said amounts to off-loading thought to this inert thing, when it should […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in