• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 146: Emmanuel Levinas on Overcoming Solitude

September 5, 2016 by Mark Linsenmayer 11 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_146_7-27-16.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 2:19:50 — 128.1MB)

Levinas by Corey MohlerMore Levinas, working this time through Time and the Other (1948).

What is it for a person to exist? What individuates one person from another, making us into selves instead of just part of the causal net of events? Why would someone possibly think that these are real, non-obvious questions that need to be addressed? Levinas gives us a phenomenological progression from the "there is," terrifyingly undifferentiated Being, to becoming an individual through "hypostasis," which is becoming an existent through a voyage out to the world and back to oneself. But this existing makes us solitary, not only in this weird ontological sense of being a distinct thing, but in a concrete, emotional sense. Overcoming this requires grasping the Other as a real Other, not as an object to fulfill our desires or get in our way. Really understanding this at our core takes some doing, and in the process, we gain a mature sense of time and of death, so, good for us!

This episode follows up on ep. 145, where we introduced some of these themes and gave Levinas's pitch for ethical responsibility.

Buy the book or read this online version.

End song: "Call on You" by Mark Lint from from the 1993 Mark Lint album Spanish Armada: Songs of Love and Related Neuroses. The song was written in 1987 when I was 16, so it's extra gooey!

Levinas image by Corey Mohler.

Please support PEL!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Emmanuel Levinas, existentialism, fear of death, phenomenology, philosophy podcast, solitude, time

Comments

  1. dmf says

    September 5, 2016 at 9:19 am

    if folks like this line of though they should check out Tom Sparrow’s work:
    http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/plastic-bodies/
    “Sensation is a concept with a conflicted philosophical history. It has found as many allies as enemies in nearly every camp from empiricism to poststructuralism. Polyvalent, with an uncertain referent, and often overshadowed by intuition, perception, or cognition, sensation invites as much metaphysical speculation as it does dismissive criticism.

    The promise of sensation has certainly not been lost on the phenomenologists who have sought to ‘rehabilitate’ the concept. In Plastic Bodies, Tom Sparrow argues that the phenomenologists have not gone far enough, however. Alongside close readings of Merleau-Ponty and Levinas, he digs into an array of ancient, modern, and contemporary texts in search of the resources needed to rebuild the concept of sensation after phenomenology. He begins to assemble a speculative aesthetics that is at once a realist theory of sensation and a philosophy of embodiment that breaks the form of the ‘lived’ body. Maintaining that the body is fundamentally plastic and that corporeal identity is constituted by a conspiracy of sensations, he pursues the question of how the body fits into/fails to fit into its aesthetic environment and what must be done to increase the body’s power to act and exist.”

    Reply
    • Wayne Schroeder says

      September 5, 2016 at 10:11 am

      nice

      Reply
  2. Wayne Schroeder says

    September 5, 2016 at 7:58 pm

    Really enjoyed both parts of Overcoming Solitude and was able to better follow the ontological flow of Levinas as you wrestled with it. I think it is more powerful to treat Levinas as an ontologist rather than a phenomenologist, meaning the problem with phenomenology in general is it’s vulnerability to lose equidistant relations with both the subject and object, but to collapse into the subject as with Heidegger’s Beying, or to be too objective in representation. Nor was there the “moralizing” present in Levinas in the first go round with him, but a true ethical encounter with the existential based on encounter with pain, suffering, other and Otherness as the impossibility of Nothingness. Very enjoyable.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      September 6, 2016 at 9:38 am

      Thanks, Wayne! I always like reading your reactions. Yes, I felt like this reading and our discussion of it was smoother, such that I kind of feel bad for folks listening through 145 first.

      Reply
  3. Wayne Schroeder says

    September 6, 2016 at 7:09 pm

    Seth owes you guys big time for diving into the deep end of the pool without complaining, but we owe him big time for his lifetime passion finally being addressed which shows up in truly encountering such a deep soul as Levinas, encountering his own soul, and bringing us along for the party! Now fully examined?

    Reply
  4. Stephen says

    October 9, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    Hi,
    Hypostasis is interesting, but not necessarily ontological in an exclusive sense.
    Existence is not a parking spot that is defined according to rules.
    Paradox – as awful as it is to embrace – ‘IS’ existence.
    Gotta read Levinas now. Thanks.

    Reply
  5. Stephen says

    October 9, 2016 at 1:28 pm

    I again,
    The crisis, or crises, is the paradox of the nominal attribute, the relegation as prescribed, the iridescent endeavor to find justification in something else and with otherness.
    Language is the obvious problem! Pronouns. “I,” “you,” “me,” “they,” on and on. It is difficult to navigate the limits that relegate “us” to such constriction of ‘existence’ or ‘being’ or even not being. What about the outer realm of being? The inter realm. All of it but without definition? Is that so bad?
    s

    Reply
  6. enesoestamos says

    July 12, 2017 at 10:30 pm

    duuuuudes, it’s /hʌɪˈpɒstəsɪs/. the ´ means pos is the strong sylable! Seth was so right, and I love him -not for that.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Episode 146: Emmanuel Levinas on Overcoming Solitude (Part Two) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 12, 2016 at 7:00 am

    […] to part 1 first, or get the ad-free, unbroken Citizen Edition. Don't forget, please support […]

    Reply
  2. Humor and Infinite Responsibility: Can Levinas Use a Little Stand-Up Comedy? | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 13, 2016 at 7:00 am

    […] a philosopher such as Emmanuel Levinas might seem intimidating, both because of his reputation for diving extremely deeply into the most […]

    Reply
  3. Episode 172: Mind, Self, and Affect with Guest Dr. Drew (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    September 18, 2017 at 7:01 am

    […] This idea that we get our own sense of self from interaction with another should be familiar to PEL listeners, and a lot of the purpose of this discussion was to reflect on some of these older philosophical ideas using modern, experimental psychology. We recommend that you check out first and foremost our episodes on Hegel's Phenomenology (#35 and #36) where we more or less introduced this topic. We gave variations on this story in our Kierkegaard, Buber, and Lacan episodes, among others. We also refer to the distinction that Sartre made between "the me" and "the I" in ep. 47, and his consequent views on freedom described in ep. 87. Another recent stab we made at discussing this confrontation with "the Other" was in our Levinas episodes (#145 and #146). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in