• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 150: Guest Peter Singer on Famine, Affluence, and Morality (Citizen Edition)

October 24, 2016 by Mark Linsenmayer 4 Comments

The Partially Examined Life (Citizens): (Protected Content)

What do we owe the poor? Mark and Wes interview perhaps the world's most influential living philosopher for an hour, then the full PEL foursome discusses.

The focus is the newly reissued/repackaged 1971 essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," which argues that just as we would regard is as unethical to fail to save a drowning child because you don't want to ruin your expensive shoes, so it's unethical to let someone die of preventable illness or hunger when an expensive-shoe-level donation would save that life. The new publication includes supplementary essays, and Peter has spent much of the rest of his career elaborating and arguing for and preaching about the practical upshot of this essay, which is that our priorities in this consumerist society are very out of whack: We don't give nearly enough to charitable causes, and we don't judge our charitable giving by the standard of helping the most people in the most substantial ways.

Peter is well known as a utilitarian (we covered him briefly back in our ep. 9 where we discussed that ethical theory), and characterizes the key insight of the moral point of view as impartialism: no one individual's interests take precedence over anyone else's from the point of view of the universe. Don't play favorites. While there are certainly utilitarian advantages of everyone being responsible first and foremost for their own children, the lives of two stranger children will still outweigh the life of your single child, and certainly (and this is the conflict we actually face) fulfilling your child's taste for luxury is much less important than saving the lives of many stranger children.

Buy the book or read the original essay online. Other works we mention are "The Objectivity of Ethics and the Unity of Practical Reason" (2012, with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek), The Life You Can Save: How to Do Your Part to End World Poverty (2009), The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically (2015), One World Now: The Ethics of Globalization (2002), The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress (2011), and The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics, (2014). His brand-new books of short essays is Ethics in the Real World: 82 Brief Essays on Things That Matter.

You may also enjoy hearing Peter on the Rationally Speaking podcast or watching his TED Talk on effective altruism, or watch this longer talk on effective altruism from the 2015 Chicago Humanities Festival.

We mention past PEL interviews with Frithjof Bergmann (about changing work patterns) and Pat Churchland (on the biological/evolutionary basis of morality).

For more about Peter, see www.petersinger.info.

Peter Singer picture by Solomon Grundy.

End song: "Ann the Word" by Beauty Pill (2015), explored in Nakedly Examined Music's ep. 19: nakedlyexaminedmusic.com.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Citizen Content, Podcast Episode (Citizen) Tagged With: Ethics, famine, Peter Singer, utilitarianism

Comments

  1. James Gallagher says

    October 24, 2016 at 8:30 pm

    A duty to rescue – explicated in this Wikipedia article – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_rescue

    Excellent podcast – one of the best.

    Reply
  2. Charles Crawford says

    May 6, 2018 at 6:33 am

    Curiously thin.

    Why not explore with P Singer why exactly people are poor, if you think that it’s a good idea to help them?

    Poverty is the natural state of things. What creates wealth?

    Maybe the money spent on helping a poor child would be better spent on paying mercenaries to overthrow the corrupt government whose policies are stopping people from getting richer?

    If X has an obligation to help poor child Y or poor adult Z thousands of miles away, what is Y’s and Z’s obligation after receiving that help? To be grateful and respectful?

    We know now 100% what allows a society to mobilise its human and natural resources. Something like pragmatic market/capitalist pluralism whose benefits compound up quite quickly.

    Many ways of doing this that are not ‘western democracy’.

    Isn’t any government NOT pursuing such basic sensible policies in favour of some sort of ‘socialism’ (see eg Venezuela, Cuba, Zimbabwe etc) in fact acting immorally? Don’t we have an urgent obligation to stop them from inflicting that stupidity on millions of people? Isn’t sending money to the impoverished victims of such regimes merely subsidising their immorality?

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Episode 150: Guest Peter Singer on Famine, Affluence, and Morality (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    November 5, 2016 at 10:03 pm

    […] to listen to part 2, i.e. the follow-up discussion here, or get the full episode ad-free via the Citizen edition with your PEL Citizenship, which will also get you into Brian Wilson's Not School online seminar on […]

    Reply
  2. Episode 150: Peter Singer on Famine, Affluence, and Morality (Part Two: Discussion) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    February 19, 2017 at 4:08 pm

    […] to the interview itself first or get the whole thing unbroken and ad-free via the Citizen edition. Please support […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in