• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 153: Richard Rorty: There Is No Mind-Body Problem

December 5, 2016 by Mark Linsenmayer 11 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_153_11-17-16.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:52:20 — 102.9MB)

On Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Part I: "Our Glassy Essence" (mostly Ch. 1).

"The mind" seems to be an unavoidable part of our basic conceptual vocabulary, but Rorty thinks not, and he wants to use the history of philosophy as a kind of therapy to show that many of our seemingly insoluble problems like the relation between mind and body are a result of philosophical mistakes by Descartes, Locke, and Kant.

Our recent guest John Searle diagnosed the main mistake similarly: Instead of looking at knowledge as a matter of us being in direct contact with external things, Locke and his ilk erroneously thought that we can only ever know our own ideas. Rorty says this view of the mind as the thing closest to us, the only thing we can really know with certainty, came from Descartes, with only hints of it earlier in the tradition. Before that, people didn't think of the mind as an "inner realm" and mental elements like pains as particular things that don't seem to be of the same type as events in the physical world.

So the solution is not to deny that the mental exists like a behaviorist, or to insist that mental terms actually refer to brain states or that mental events and brain states are two aspects of the same underlying substance: Rather than bridge the "ontological gap" between mental and physical in this way, Rorty would rather we back up and reject the conceptual system that gives rise to this apparent problem in the first place.

Buy the book or try this online version.

Mark, Wes, and Dylan are joined by Stephen Metcalf of Slate's Culture Gabfest podcast, a former pupil of Rorty's. We plan to return to the book in ep. 155 to talk about Rorty's take on epistemology. If you're new to the philosophy of mind, we recommend you pick up our ep. 21, which gives a broad overview of the topic. I'd also recommend our ep. 55–56 on Wittgenstein, whose "private language" argument (and overall approach to philosophical problems as language games) is a key influence here.

Rorty pic by Corey Mohler.

Please support PEL!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: epistemology, philosophy of mind, philosophy podcast, Richard Rorty, stephen metcalf

Comments

  1. Vishal says

    December 6, 2016 at 1:05 am

    The line “Buy the PEL 2017 Wall Calendar and other merch at our store.” contains a typo and a broken link. “Merch” should probably be spelled “Merchant”, and the link from “our store” is missing an “h” in the url.

    Reply
    • Seth Paskin says

      December 6, 2016 at 8:53 am

      Thanks Vishal. The link is now fixed and I added a link directly to the calendar. “Merch” is short for ‘merchandise’ and is a common colloquialism that we think folks will get.

      Reply
  2. Wayne Schroeder says

    December 6, 2016 at 10:00 pm

    So lets sit around the yuletide fire wile imbibing good spirits and chat with the exquisitely insecure Richar Rorty. Or we can think better of that and choose his better, overly-secure avatars, the PEL group and Rorty specialist Steven. As usual, this was a fun expression of Rorty pragmatism in a loquacious, playful and informed jolly get-together.

    Ok, so it’s always already about doing philosophical therapy, which means you can never know for sure when you are done. All we need to know is that we have no problem of mind, unless we think it is a problem, for which Rorty’s proper therapy is necessary.

    Through a genealogical review of how the mind-body problem developed, Rorty seeks to downgrade the parallel Nietzschean Good-Evil misperception to the equivalent of the more simple good-bad problem. In this case, there is no division, no real ontological difference between mind and body, just a false epistemological division which came about via Descartes, Kant and modern philosophy.

    Rorty does well to attack the concept of knowing as a “glassy essence” or mental mirroring/representation (correspondence) of the external world. He also makes good points in distinguishing between the universal (non spatial) and particular (spatial) as parallel to the mind-body false dualism.

    Perhaps most applicable for today is his argument that being able to identify the neurology of a person’s thinking would not be the same as “knowing” what a person is thinking, or as PEL analogized, knowing the syntax (neuronal structure) does not give the semantics (knowledge of the thought). If someone’s brain is blown up as a factory, and we could walk around in it and see the mechanics of thinking, that doesn’t mean we could know the meaning of the person’s thinking processes.

    So Rorty therapy eliminates the metaphor of mind as a medium of appearances, of the mere phenomenal. His pragmatism, antiessentialism, and genealogical position paints philosophical problems as merely transient tensions in the dynamics of evolving, contingent vocabularies. Analytic philosophy has no refuge in essentialism and continental philosophy can not claim phenomenological truth–there is no ontological gap.

    Reply
  3. Christos says

    December 10, 2016 at 1:24 am

    That was a very high quality philosophical discourse as usual on this podcast. Everyone was on fire, every sentence was informative and fluently articulated. Contemporary “analytic” philosophy happens to be the kind of philosophy I’m most interested in, while political might be the least interesting to me, so I’m ecstatic to hear you guys are doing another couple analytic episodes in a row after those couple political ones (which were apropos and probably very popular and satisfying to most people).

    It made me wonder how many contemporary episodes you guys have done (anything 20th Century and later). These figures are rough, since I quickly scrolled through without putting much thought into the categories:

    Analytic: 42/153
    Continental: 26/153
    Miscellaneous: 12/153
    Total: 80/153

    I think that’s a very healthy variety of episodes. You all have covered a lot of ground, and it’s been fun listening. Love all your episodes, ancient, modern, and everything in between. Thank you for the time and work you put into this podcast.

    Reply
  4. dmf says

    December 18, 2016 at 3:51 pm

    thanks guys (and Stephen who was an excellent addition), this was a welcome and well done return to this pivotal text in my own philosophical development.
    grist for the mill:
    http://faculty.cas.usf.edu/sturner5/Papers/CogSciencepapers/WebDavidsonsNormativity.pdf

    Reply
    • dmf says

      December 18, 2016 at 4:38 pm

      would add tho that I don’t think I need to make a Kierkegaardian leap in terms of sociality/sociability if I follow something like Davidson’s principle of interpretive charity, which might well be extended to AI or other such aliens, this is indeed Wittgensteinian, see:

      Reply
  5. Micah Ben Desmarais Linz says

    July 25, 2017 at 5:06 am

    Do you guys have transcripts of your episodes?

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. PEL 2017 Calendar w/ Art from Existential Comics | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    December 6, 2016 at 2:41 pm

    […] drawn a bunch of philosopher pictures for us over the last couple of years (including this week's Richard Rorty), and we've collected them all with some quotes worthy of staring at for a month each, and […]

    Reply
  2. Episode 153: Richard Rorty: There Is No Mind-Body Problem (Part Two) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    December 24, 2016 at 10:35 pm

    […] to part one first, or get the Citizen […]

    Reply
  3. Richard Rorty and the Origins of Post-Truth | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    December 30, 2016 at 7:00 am

    […] prescient philosopher is Richard Rorty. Although he did not identify himself as such, Rorty was famously associated with postmodernism and […]

    Reply
  4. Episode 155: Richard Rorty Against Epistemology (Part One) | The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast | A Philosophy Podcast and Blog says:
    January 2, 2017 at 10:01 am

    […] problem, but no: As with the related issue of inner mind vs. outer world (as discussed in ep. 153), this has been a matter of our idiosyncratic history, and a proper reading of the ancient Greeks […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in