• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

On Being a Monster: “Frankenstein” and Creative Ambition, Part V—Artist

January 19, 2018 by Wes Alwan 2 Comments

Subscribe to more of my writing at https://www.wesalwan.com

Follow me on Twitter

This essay is the fifth in a five-part series, in honor of the 200th anniversary of the publication of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. Part four can be found here.

Part V: Artist

Consider Mary Shelley’s task. In a competition with great poets, one of whom was her future husband, she was asked to create a ghost story. Instead, she created a story of excessive ambition as the ghosting of the self. Worried at first about whether she could come up with a story at all, she wrote a tale about the perils of being both creator and creature, one reflecting anxieties of influence that can become especially acute to the would-be artist. Instead of writing a ghost story, she wrote an early work of science fiction that proudly displays the influence of what is arguably the ultimate source of the genre, Paradise Lost.

And instead of having her ghosts appear as they usually do, of their own accord—from the rafters or the grave—Shelley has her protagonist create his own. In a typical ghost story, ghosts are not creatures but creators. We might think of them as the spirits of our ancestors—our biological and cultural progenitors—returning presumably because they are unhappy for our hanging on to the luxury of life when they have been forced to give it up. They reflect the anxiety that living must come at the expense of the dead, and youth at the expense of old age, leading to the return of malign, retributive forces. They speak to the notion that in creating us, our creators have handed their vitality over to us, and may come to regret this decision and want it back. In Frankenstein, it is creature rather than creator that returns from the grave, not to retrieve vitality but to complain of the monstrosity of being created.

Once we read the creature as not just a literal but figurative expression of the creator, then the ghost re-inhabits its typical role. The monster is the return of devitalized creator, where the loss of vitality represents a failure of creativity driven by an inability to tolerate the imperfection of the creative process. Creativity collapses into self-creation. This failure is driven in part by the creator’s anxieties about her own status as a creature, the product of some creative process. Ideally, creativity overcomes or manages such anxieties. But sometimes it is infected by them. The trick is to harness some of the grandiosity that provides the electrical jolt for bringing creative work to life, without letting this grandiosity overwhelm us to the point of producing something grotesque.

To be a creature—of the human, self-conscious sort—is to walk the fine line between two sorts of monstrosity. On the one side, to be a social being is always to be faced with the prospect of not getting the sociability we need: of being an outcast. Because such social ties are constitutive, the threat of being an outcast is the threat of being psychically destroyed. On the other side, constitutive social forces can become entrapping. One attempt at a solution is, like Frankenstein, to simply try to fly away: to try to transcend the predicament altogether, become perfectly independent and self-creating, and be a creator par excellence. This solution does not work. In this, the anxieties of creature-hood have invaded the creative act. Another solution is to put all one’s hopes, like Frankenstein’s creature, in being loved. This solution does not work either. The middle ground is very simply the activity of loving, and the creativity it implies. In Frankenstein, the prototypical instance of such love is love of nature: it cannot love you back, but nor can it reject you. But there is no husbandry in this relationship, and no reproduction. More to the point are creative acts that aspire not principally to greatness but to their own activity—to the reproduction of an experience. These cannot complete us, or our desires. They cannot make us feel as though we are loved without condition, as by a parent or a god. But in replacing being loved with loving, they give us everything we can hope for: an adult form and a pair of wings, not for reaching the stars, but for making our way from flower to flower.

–Wes Alwan

Subscribe to more of my writing at https://www.wesalwan.com

Follow me on Twitter


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, philosophy blog, psychology

Comments

  1. Michael says

    January 22, 2018 at 3:17 pm

    Beautifully written! Thanks for writing that Wes!

    Reply
    • Wes Alwan says

      March 5, 2018 at 10:01 pm

      Thanks Michael!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in