• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Episode 184: Pascal on Human Nature (Part Two)

February 26, 2018 by Mark Linsenmayer 4 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_184pt2_1-28-18.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:08:01 — 62.3MB)

Continuing on Pascal's Pensées.

More on our human desire and how God is supposed to address that, plus Pascal's views on political philosophy, the relation between faith, reason, and custom… and finally, the wager! We get into the obvious objections. Why not just be a skeptic? Is Pascal right that people suck?

Listen to part 1 first or get the unbroken, ad-free, Citizen Edition now. Please support PEL!

End song: "44 Days" by Dutch Henry, written and sung by Todd Long, as interviewed on Nakedly Examined Music #34.

Pascal picture by Drew Blom.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Blaise Pascal, Pascal's wager, philosophy of religion, philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. Evan Hadkins says

    March 1, 2018 at 1:33 am

    The secular, popular equivalent of Fallenness, is like the movie Out of the Silent Planet, “the monsters from the Id”.

    Reply
  2. Matt says

    March 3, 2018 at 8:23 pm

    I was somewhat surprised by how much I enjoyed this episode and Pascal in general. In particular, his idea of imagination and the role it plays in society, custom, power as well as its relationship to reason. I thought that was incredibly perceptive and insightful. As with most philosophers, I think I’ll take with those insights and things that I like and just leave the bits I don’t (or chalk it up to time period).

    Good stuff guys made my commute to work through traffic a bit easier to endure!

    Reply
  3. Monte Knetter says

    July 24, 2018 at 11:12 am

    While discussing the “wager” Mark notes the impossibility of simply ‘choosing to believe,’ i.e. that it is impossible to will to believe something we are not intellectually convinced of. I agree and I think this is actually the point that Pascal is trying to make in this section.

    Pascal has offered what he takes to be a rational, or at least reasonable, argument yet he doesn’t expect his readers to accept it. Why not? Because we’ve made ourselves into people that aren’t governed by reason. We pretend to be all rational and sophisticated, but this is a façade—in reality we are ruled by our passions. And because of this we are incapable of accepting the truth.

    We see this in other, more obvious areas of life. A drunkard can drink himself into a state wherein he honestly and sincerely believes that one more drink will do him no harm—he has made himself into a creature that cannot see, receive, or believe the truth. Or consider Shakespeare’s Othello. That work is a great demonstration of how humans corrupt themselves and thereby blind themselves from the truth.

    That, according to Pascal, is why we don’t come to faith. We might rationalize our rejection of Christ, but we are really full of crap. Yes, we honestly can’t believe, but that is because we have made ourselves into people incapable of belief. Our greatest lack isn’t intellectual, but rather moral. That is why Pascal says we must first change our habits, behaviors, etc. and only then can there be the possibility of an intellectual acceptance of faith.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. The Philosophy of Blaise Pascal: A Collection of Online Resources and Key Quotes | The Daily Idea says:
    October 19, 2019 at 8:10 pm

    […] Pascal on Human Nature (Part Two) […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in