• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 199: Guest Elizabeth Anderson on Private Government (Part Two)

September 24, 2018 by Mark Linsenmayer 3 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_199pt2_8-9-18.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:03:05 — 57.8MB)

Continuing on Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (2017) and “What Is the Point of Equality?” (1999).

Should the amount of respect that a worker gets be proportional to his or her market value? Our guest tells us more about how all citizens have the right to have their interests considered and what this means for how the relationship between employers and employees might change. We talk health care, income inequality, Tyler Cowen, libertarianism, and more.

Start with part one. We'll do some post-guest discussion to more thoroughly cover the text in part 3, but you needn't wait: Get the unbroken, ad-free Citizen Edition now.

Please consider supporting PEL. And if you enjoyed Mark's music at the ends of our episodes through the first 149, you can contribute to the costs involved in the new Mark Lint album through patreon.com/marklint.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: egalitarianism, elizabeth anderson, philosophy podcast, political philosophy, workers rights

Comments

  1. Luke T says

    September 28, 2018 at 5:13 pm

    I remember now what I wanted to say about this interview, even though I listened to it on the first day of release (Monday, 17 September) and have not consulted it since. I recall being struck by how – both on the author’s own accounting, and as reflected by PEL hosts’ commentary – the philosophical ambitions of her project ultimately have to marry up (either implicitly or explicitly) with the public’s general disposition / ideological affiliation, for them to have any purchase on policy or real, practical outcomes (which presumably is motivating the work, at least in part).

    To do so otherwise would be to render your life’s scholarly work so much a giant lead paperweight, for it not having enough traction or intuitive uptake outside of the cloistered confines of the academy. This is what I take from the mature intellectual compromises involved, at least. and so that’s to be commended.

    it seems like the author is just trying to correct for some of the most egregious and most obvious distortions of original, classic liberal economic philosophy. Those, especially as she recommends in the preview of her current/future work (http://philosophy247.org/podcasts/neo), might tug even at the hard-core libertarian’s conscience and sense of fairness.

    Considering her to be more libertarian than the orthodox libertarian, as Mark suggested, is a really interesting thought experiment that I hope the PEL crew will return to at some point.

    Reply
  2. Matthew says

    September 29, 2018 at 2:21 pm

    I feel like Wendy Brown needs to be on this one. Libertarianism and it’s recent iterations seem fine when it comes to people being more involved in their schools and the Feds being less involved. However the tangled web of pensions being tide to retirement really makes Libertarianism seem like another facade of Neo Liberal and it’s technocratic analysism sneaking into a political gap caused by the absence of the Demos caused by its nature.

    Reply
  3. Matthew says

    September 29, 2018 at 2:24 pm

    I kind of missed my point. What I am saying is as a matter of respect shouldn’t we try to keep the Institutions like Academia around but Purge the Neoliberalism and it’s instruments first.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in