• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 218: The Hard Problem of Consciousness (Chalmers, et al) (Part Two)

June 24, 2019 by Mark Linsenmayer 4 Comments

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_218pt2_5-19-19.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 50:07 — 46.0MB)

Continuing on "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature" by David Chalmers (2003).

We finish Chalmers's account of the types of physicialism, then move on to dualism (including epiphenomenalism), and finally dally with panpsychism, the specialty of our guest, Gregory Miller from the Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast.

Listen to part 1 first or listen to the unbroken, ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

End song: "Georgia Hard" by Robbie Fulks, as interviewed on Nakedly Examined Music #36.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: consciousness, David Chalmers, materialism, panpsychism, philosophy of mind, philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. August Denys says

    June 26, 2019 at 11:55 pm

    So is this not coming to Google Play Music or Spotify? I waited a couple of days to make sure because this happened similarly before with episode 209 on Francis Fukuyama (where you only had part two and not part one), but I’m just curious at this point. I tend not to listen on the website because it’s not the place in which I can comfortable listen. Anyway, that is all.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      June 27, 2019 at 12:57 am

      Occasionally I forget to check the appropriate box. Thanks for letting me know! -ML

      Reply
  2. Bill Youmans says

    July 24, 2019 at 7:53 pm

    Phenomenal episode. Epiphenomenal! You guys are astounding. So many sharp points. I have listened to it a number of times, and read Chalmers’ paper. Thank you for one of PEL’s most stimulating podcasts! Just brilliant.

    I can’t discuss this or any philosophical question on the level that you guys do. I don’t have a very good grasp of the terms and concepts. I have been studying in a desultory way Advaita (non-dual) Vedanta, which has a great deal to say about consciousness. This branch of Hindu philosophy is a highly developed kind of monism, not quite Type F, if I have understood the classification properly.

    Ancient Hindus and Buddhists have been debating consciousness for many centuries. There are as many approaches to the subject in the East as there are in the West, and they are no closer to general agreement as to what consciousness is than we are. There are dualists, materialists, and monists of all kinds.

    Advaita Vedanta resembles Type F Monism in that consciousness (Brahman- existence/consciousness/bliss) is the substance of everything. Unlike Spinoza’s substance, which is only conscious insofar as our brains create consciousness in us individually, the substance here is itself conscious. It is existence. It is the awareness in which everything appears. Everything else, the objects that APPEAR in consciousness, is unreal. So Advaita does away with dualism by getting rid of matter. There is one mind, and it is dreaming all of this apparent duality. It is the screen on which the movie is projected. It is eternal and unchanging, pure awareness. Like in a dream, you seem to be in a situation, and everything appears to be distinct from you, the subject, and there are many objects, but they are all really you. So they are all one.

    But, if I understand Advaita correctly, it is only mind and intellect which give us the feeling of “what it is like to be” what we are. Unlike in Type F, things without mind – rocks and plastic etc, – do not have any such sense in Advaita. But mind and intellect are also only objects of awareness. They are not awareness itself, and hence are temporal and illusory.

    This awareness is not to be confused with the awareness we feel as distinct egos- THAT awareness is merely a reflection of this super-awareness. We cannot see this awareness as an object, because it is purely subjective. You can’t see your own eyeball except by reflection in a mirror.

    The difference between this understanding and that of Buddhism, is that in Buddhism, even this consciousness is continually changing. In Advaita it cannot change; it only perceives.

    The materialist seems able to dispatch this concept with the objection of deep sleep or anesthesia. How can consciousness be independent of the body, when it disappears in those two states? The Advaitan replies, “those states are not absence of awareness, but awareness of absence”. They are consciousness without objects, and pure consciousness cannot be aware of itself. They claim that since, when we awaken from anesthesia or from deep sleep, we are aware that we were unconscious for a period of time, there must have been consciousness present even in those states. Otherwise we would have been completely unaware of any missing time. Having been recently anesthetized myself, I don’t know if that flies! Ha ha!

    I don’t know if this really adds anything to the discussion. And I apologize that this isn’t really the same discussion, or on the same level of the podcast. I guess I’m asking if it’s relevant that the idea of “what it’s “like” to experience anything is itself an OBJECT of awareness, so awareness itself must be separate from it. Everything – sensory impressions, physical objects, thoughts, emotions – appears in this awareness. There is nothing it is “like” to experience this awareness directly since it cannot be an object of awareness.

    Ok Maybe someone will find this relevant in some way. Or, feel free to explain why this is already covered in one of Chalmer’s categories, or if it even deserves to be a category at all, at least in my cursory and incomplete articulation of it?

    Thanks again!

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. The Philosophy of Consciousness: A Collection of Online Resources and Key Quotes – The Daily Idea says:
    September 9, 2019 at 3:58 am

    […] The Hard Problem of Consciousness (Chalmers, et al) (Part Two) […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Bibliophile on Pretty Much Pop #143: Pinocchio the Unfilmable (Yet Frequently Filmed)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in