• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 223: Guest Ned Block on Consciousness (Part Two)

August 19, 2019 by Mark Linsenmayer 1 Comment

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_223pt2_7-21-19.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 55:12 — 50.6MB)

We talk with Ned about a second Blockheads (2019) article, Michael Tye's “Homunculi Heads and Silicon Chips: The Importance of History to Phenomenology," which provides a variation off of the David Chalmers fading qualia argument (see our ep. 222), plus Ned's Blockheads response "Fading Qualia: A Response to Michael Tye."

Ned thinks that someone really could be radically wrong about our phenomenology (like the mid-point case between a qualia-free robot and a normal human who nonetheless displays behavior including verbal reports and beliefs identical to a normal human) and as evidence, points to people with neurological problems who claim to have certain experiences but clearly are not. He uses the "swamp person" (actually reflected in Alan Moore's Swamp Thing, incidentally) example to argue against Tye's claim that to be conscious, a creature needs to have a certain history (as opposed to just a certain structure).

After Ned leaves us, Mark, Seth, Dylan, and Wes continue exploring the details uncovered by our interview. What's the relationship of Ned's breed of materialism to a very fine-grained materialism? After all, being "matter" is actually still a structural property; even being a certain type of molecule is ultimately structural. Plus, we evaluate Ned's claim that insects probably don't have qualia. We consider potential future directions for reading prompted by our Blockheads reading and consider the need for philosophers to know about and speak to current brain science.

Purchase Blockheads!: Essays on Ned Block's Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness, edited Adam Pautz and Daniel Stoljar. It includes new essays by David Chalmers, Hilary Putnam, Frank Jackson, and many other leading figures in the philosophy of mind discussing.

Watch Ned talk about his current work on the border between perception and cognition on YouTube:

Listen to part one first, or get the ad-free, unbroken Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

End song: "Your So Dark Sleep/Goodbye" by The Black Watch. Mark interviews singer/songwriter John Andrew Fredrick on Nakedly Examined Music #102. Be sure to go subscribe to Pretty Much Pop: A Culture Podcast, at prettymuchpop.com.

Image by Solomon Grundy.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Michael Tye, ned block, philosophy of mind, philosophy podcast

Comments

  1. Charles Crawford says

    August 20, 2019 at 11:25 am

    Dear PEL,

    Interesting discussion, although at this point of bashing away at ‘consciousness’ it seems like you’re merely making the rubble bounce!

    It usually seems to me that because you tend to gloss over the basic step of agreeing at the outset what counts as making sense (and not making sense) on the subject concerned, much of the discussion is at confusing cross-purposes…

    You might like to check out this robust and detailed attack on the key Nagel idea that ‘what it is like to be a bat’ is in any way a useful way to look at consciousness, or indeed an intelligible idea in the first place!

    http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/scr/hacker/docs/To%20be%20a%20bat.pdf

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in