• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 226: Francis Bacon Invents Science (Part One)

September 23, 2019 by Mark Linsenmayer 1 Comment

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_226pt1_9-1-19.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 43:39 — 40.0MB)

On Sir Francis Bacon's New Organon (1620), aka Novum Organum.

An "organon" is a toolset, and Bacon claims to have developed a new toolset that will open up nature to inquiry in a way that wasn't possible for ancient and modern natural philosophy. Mark, Wes, and Dylan consider the degree to which what Bacon describes actually corresponds to the scientific method as we would recognize it, talk through Bacon's "four idols" that interfere with impartial inquiry, and consider how Bacon's method fits in with his larger political-ethical-religious view of "instauration," whereby we gain mastery over nature, recovering from the God's curse when he kicked Man out of the garden of Eden for eating the fruit of knowledge.

Some current conflicts between science and philosophy are on display here: Bacon does believe (à la "scientism") that the scientific method applies to all subjects including human affairs, even as he does make a (merely nominal?) distinction between the realms appropriate for science and for religion. He criticizes other thinkers for jumping from a single inquiry to some kind of global theory (as when now economists see everything in terms of economics, or Freudians interpret all behavior according to that falsifiable theory). Also, Bacon's four idols may describe removable obstacles to correct use of his method, or they may well anticipate historicist/post-modern critiques of science by describing science as always performed by people with their various idiosyncratic, social, and philosophical biases. Bacon also seems to anticipate Karl Popper by stressing the value of "negative instances," where you rule out a hypothesis.

Interestingly, Bacon doesn't use the term "hypothesis" as much as one would expect. His method instead makes use of a series of tables. When investigating heat, for instance (his example that takes up the beginning of book 2), first write down all instances you can think of of heat, then related cases where heat is not present, cases where the amount of heat varies by some factor or other, then list (based on the previous tables) what you can rule out as the cause of heat, and finally you look at what's left and can give "the first vintage form" of heat, where "form" here retains a term used in the Scholastic (i.e., Aristotelian) science of his day but which in Bacon's new scheme is really getting at the law of nature behind why a thing is what it is.

We read the Joseph Devey translation (1902), which you can read online or buy it. We officially adhered to the St. John's College reading list for this: the Preface, Book I: aphorisms 1–69, 129, 130; Book II, 1–25, 52, and skimmed the rest to get the general idea. Also, there's a Librivox you can listen to.

You might also be interested in reading about (but probably not actually reading) Bacon's utopian novel New Atlantis.

Continues with part two; get the full, unbroken, ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

Image by Solomon Grundy.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: philosophy of science, philosophy podcast, scientific method, Sir Francis Bacon

Comments

  1. dmf says

    September 23, 2019 at 1:32 pm

    good stuff, on the development of the experimental this is vital reading:
    https://monoskop.org/images/7/74/Shapin_Steven_Schaffer_Simon_Leviathan_and_The_Air-Pump_Hobbes_Boyle_and_the_Experimental_Life.pdf

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in