• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Revisiting Philosophy and Media Critique (Why Pretty Much Pop?)

October 22, 2019 by Mark Linsenmayer 1 Comment

Thanks to all of you that have extended your hearts beyond the core PEL group that you know and love to listen to some of my spin-off shows. I'm well aware that being into songwriting techniques and musicians' personalities as exhibited on Nakedly Examined Music is not at all the same thing as being into philosophy, and that it's mostly just coincidence if a PEL fan might also become an NEM fan (though some of my guests there are more literary than others in their approach; you all might really like Barry Andrews, for instance, who may well be my most philosophical guest on that podcast yet).

Pretty Much Pop, by contrast, is an effort that grows directly out of my work on The Partially Examined Life, and is a direct result of my being dragged into talking about works beyond philosophy texts by my PEL co-hosts. I think I started in philosophy as something of a science-head, not in that I was all that interested in literacy in the experimental sciences, but in that I see philosophy as fundamentally about solving problems and getting at truth. Philosophy has the advantage over science that it can deal with problems that we can't even quite articulate, that are so central to our being that we don't even know what concepts to use to capture them. Hence phenomenology, hence a pragmatic philosophy OF science that connects the facts you're in search of to why specifically you want to know, hence tools to figure out how to live.

At the same time, I was merely tolerant of more literary attempts to present philosophic truth. Yes, there are advantages to showing a philosophy or phenomena to be studied as enacted by and engaged with by a character. Yes, by putting words into a character's mouth instead of just writing them in a treatise, the author gains a level of ironic detachment that can be fruitful in experimenting with different philosophies. But really, it would save us all some time if the would-be philosophers writing fiction would just spell out their claims explicitly and argue for them.

This dismissive attitude of mine extended toward a dislike of popular essays, which oversimplify and leave important matters unarticulated and unargued. It should be the point of philosophy to cut through such bullshit, right? Well, this made me rather miss the point on episodes like our 2014 one on Emerson. I've also been highly contemptuous of Marxist, psychoanalytic, social constructionist, or other attempts to attribute motives and blinders to all of us that we're not aware of. I mean, isn't there some level of self-reflection and skeptical hedging that should just immunize one from these kinds of accusations? Doesn't being so irritatingly self-reflective make me woke by definition?

After a number of discussions delving into fiction, film, polemical essays, and developing my schtick with NEM, I now feel more comfortable looking at our lived experience, at the extent to which we create meaning out of stories, what stories do to us, and how we feel about our own enjoyment of things and relate to others with regard to their opinions of our opinions... that whole sticky mess of looking at our everyday practices not with an eye to necessarily judging them or otherwise analyzing them into definitive bits, but still coming out a bit wiser. Thus the work in progress which is Pretty Much Pop, where we're now looking at the appeal of various modes of media intake, genres, properties, works, tropes, and other phenomena that slip between the cracks. This is part and parcel to me of the philosophical command to know thyself.

Plus, it's fun. My goal has been to create a team and a way of engaging with them that's lighter than PEL. I understand that if you're coming to PEL for serious education, many PMP episodes are not going to fit the bill. If you just wanted some insights, hopefully we still have plenty of them in there amidst the joking around and waxing nostalgic.

I want to assure you that we're committed to maintaining our normal PEL schedule, drilling into classic texts both old and new: We're looking at Descartes, Latour, Locke, and Beauvoir at least coming up this season (though all topics are tentative until we actually record on them). And hopefully having PMP episodes up here on Spider-Man and Friends and The Handmaid's Tale will lure in more people who might not otherwise think to sit through a discussion of Simone Weil or Epicurus or Alfred Tarski.

Thanks as always for listening (and reading this). I am always honored for the musings I emit or facilitate to be worth anyone's time.

And if you do want a PEL feed free from all other types of content (including commercials!), just sign up as a $1 supporter at patreon.com/partiallyexaminedlife.

Conversely, if you want to ensure that Pretty Much Pop continues and get further into the episode planning and off-the-wall idea-works with us, I encourage you to likewise sign up at patreon.com/prettymuchpop. Or at least sign up for Pretty Much Pop via its own feed (like via Apple Podcasts, or search for it on Stitcher, Google Play, etc.) so you don't need to wait a week and a half before you're seeing the latest episode.

-Mark Linsenmayer

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Featured Article, Misc. Philosophical Musings Tagged With: media critique, philosophy and popular culture, Pretty Much Pop

Comments

  1. dmf says

    October 22, 2019 at 5:46 pm

    cool, Latour isn’t a great way into science and tech studies (not even the best source for Actor Network Theory) so unless yer headed into Object Oriented Ontology land I’d skip him.
    Don Ihde who largely invented the philo of tech might be of interest: http://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/Don_Ihde

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in