• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 230: Bruno Latour on Science, Culture, and Modernity (Part Two)

December 2, 2019 by Mark Linsenmayer 5 Comments

https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_230pt2_11-4-19.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:01:18 — 56.2MB)

Continuing on Latour's We Have Never Been Modern (1993) with guest Lynda Olman.

Latour is challenging the idea of objective truth totally apart from perceivers; so is he an idealist? He claims that he is not; he's not even a strong social constructionist. We lay out the "Constitution" of modernity that keeps science and politics separate, how this way of thinking about things makes it difficult for us to address issues like climate change, and we get into Latour's positive account for what should replace this Constitution.

Start with part 1 or get the full, ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

End song: "Mono No Aware" by Guy Sigsworth, as discussed on Nakedly Examined Music #109.

Sponsors: $10 off at skylightframe.com (code PEL), 20% off at hempfusion.com (code PEL), learn about St. John's College at sjc.edu, and give effectively through givewell.org/PEL.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Bruno Latour, modernity, philosophy of science, philosophy podcast, science wars

Comments

  1. dmf says

    December 3, 2019 at 2:52 pm

    so we assemble tools (vocabularies, algorithms, hammer, microscopes, etc) that allow us to manipulate our environments in ways that more or less suit us, meet and shape our interests, no more no less…

    Reply
  2. GL Rosa says

    December 5, 2019 at 1:34 am

    Re: anti-enlightenment thinking, John Gray would make an excellent guest:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gray_(philosopher)

    Reply
  3. Bob says

    December 17, 2019 at 6:22 pm

    If science is a separate reality, then science is a social construct.

    Reply
  4. Larry Rosenthal says

    March 19, 2020 at 4:13 pm

    Relative to the inability of the modern constitution to address things like digital gaslighting/harassment, flaws Prof. Olman trumpets confidently:

    It might be useful to consider the evolving jurisprudence on the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED).

    Though bound as it must be by speech freedoms, we do no less have in IIED an extant theory of social wrong, legal recognition of harm, and deterrence via civil action in this space. There’s even been talk among scholars of extending IIED doctrine into the criminal law, to hold perpetrators responsible for revenge porn, cyber bullying, and the like.

    The real impediment obstructing progress becomes the true hybrid of online interaction, namely, anonymity. 4chan users may well be elusive and untouchable. Identifying them and serving legal process upon them may remain well nigh impossible for the time being, but not entirely due to a failure of vision and lawmaking. Modern law and policy are pliable.

    The conceptualization of this harm evolved from the modern constitution. While mourning its many failings, we should appreciate its evolution and capabilities. The nuance of IIED and its heritage may well serve to sharpen the arguments Olman and Latour forge.

    Reply
  5. Fabian says

    June 29, 2020 at 8:26 am

    It would be cool if you did another episode on Latour, focusing more on his arguments why he’s not a social constructionist. The best essays for this are in his Pandora’s Hope book. In the first chapter he explicitly describes his own project as getting away from the Cartesian-Kantian tradition of the dualism between an inner and an outer world (whether this inner world is called “consciousness” or “culture”). That means, he does not want to be understood as a Neo-Kantian at all. What he ends up being is what one could call an “ontological constructivist” (not only do our conceptual schemes of nature/the world change, but the world itself changes when i.e. Pasteur conducted his experiments). It’s closer to Whitehead’s Process Ontology or James’ refusal of a “ready-made world” than to Kant/Descartes.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?
  • Ronald Cogen on Ep. 311: Understanding the Dao De Jing (Part One)
  • Brian Grindel on PEL Nightcap February 2023

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in