• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 237: Walter Benjamin Analyzes Violence (Part Two)

March 9, 2020 by Mark Linsenmayer 8 Comments

http://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_237pt2_2-13-20.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 47:30 — 43.6MB)

Continuing on Benjamin's "Critique of Violence" (1921).

Mark, Wes, and Seth keep trying to figure out this difficult essay. Is Benjamin really advocating a workers' revolution to end the state, or just reflecting on a hypothetical to explore the limits of the concept of violence? According to Judith Butler's interpretation of the essay, the takeaway is the alternative to motivation through force, i.e., speech. She supports this by referring to some other essays, "The Task of the Translator" (1921, i.e., immediately after the current essay) and the earlier "On Language as Such and on the Language of Man" (1916), where language is given functions with religious significance (he talks about "the divine infinity of the pure word"). This connects, of course (in ways that I don't understand, having not read those essays), with how Benjamin actually concludes "Critique of Violence," which is with the discussion of "divine violence" as somehow transcending means-end analysis and the corruption inherent in violence.

Begin with part one or get the full, ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

End song: "Jericho" from hackedepiciotto, as interviewed on Nakedly Examined Music #116.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: anarchism, critical theory, Frankfurt School, philosophy podcast, political philosophy, violence

Comments

  1. Sarah says

    March 10, 2020 at 1:54 am

    What’s the name is this song?

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      March 10, 2020 at 8:25 am

      Oops, thanks, I’ve added it to the description.

      Reply
  2. Sebastian says

    March 10, 2020 at 6:54 am

    To clarify the point about pure means, it may come from Kant’s moral philosophy rather than the aesthetics. Just to point out, the criterion for the morality of maxims determining actions is not an end, but rather merely its conformity to Reason’s highest rule, the categorical imperative. Thus acting morally flows from the rule itself, not in any pursuit of a an assumed goal (the Good, under whatever form it is determined).

    I don’t know whether Benjamin was that familiar with Kant’s moral philosophy (Continental philosophers often don’t take that part as seriously). However, that part of Kant may make more sense of that point about divine violence. Furthermore, looking at what Kant says about God’s will or the holy will, there we have faculties that are not partially determined by sensuous grounds and where we thus have the conflict of choosing between goals and acting from the moral law. Divine violence would thus be exacting what the moral law requires, without a look to the goal that it is trying to achieve. Since the moral law is a thing from out of this world, it also wouldn’t be caught up in the process of instituting/reinforcing the law.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      March 10, 2020 at 8:27 am

      Thanks, that makes sense. I think we were too beholden to the secondary source in this case (which was talking about the aesthetics).

      Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      March 10, 2020 at 8:27 am

      Thanks, that makes sense. I think we were too beholden to the secondary source in this case (which was talking about the aesthetics).

      Reply
  3. Dan McLaughlin says

    March 15, 2020 at 9:47 am

    Good discussion. Thank you. The shuffling about means without end is probably one of the ideas that inspired the Frankfurt Schools focus on instrumental reasoning. Agamben, of course, runs with this thread, profitably, depending on your view, chasing down these ideas in his Sacer Homo series, as well as Means without End, where I think he’s moving toward the relationship, if one can be convincingly offered, between gesture outside of language (like violence without aiming for state) and messianism. It was also his contribution to the Paulist charrette.

    Reply
  4. Phil Tanny says

    April 8, 2020 at 5:51 am

    I wonder if analyzing violence is really so complicated. It seems a simple fact will suffice. 95%+ of violence is committed by men, a consistent pattern going back thousands of years. Anyone older than 10 can turn on their TV and see this for themselves.

    Defining the problem this simply would seem to open the door to a simple (not to be confused with easy) solution. What if there were no male humans? Or perhaps only a tiny number made available for breeding?

    In such a case the vast majority of violence would seem to vanish, alleviating vast suffering. This in turn would allow trillions upon trillions of dollars now spent in response to violence to be redirected towards more constructive projects like health care and education etc. In short, a world without men would reach the long sought goal of world peace, or as close to it as we’re likely to ever get.

    So, world peace is possible. But we don’t like the price tag so we declare it impossible.

    Sometimes making the issue as simple as possible is the most useful philosophy?

    Reply
  5. Arseni says

    November 21, 2020 at 8:42 am

    Fascinating. I highly recommend you look into what is going on in Belarus presently. In short, the people are protesting their self-proclaimed president who hasn’t stepped down for 26 years, but they do so without focusing on violence, rather they demand a dialogue with the government. They are met with immense violence from the police, but continue to not use mass violence in return. So in other words, while the people want to change the government, they are not engaging in law-making violence.

    They do focus on mass strikes, though, but in this case the indirect victims that are the citizens actively promote strikes and they form alternative systems based on social trust to mitigate the negative consequences of the strikes on themselves. As a result, while the people are protected, the government receives an increased burden of strikes which introduces an interesting grey area of whether this can be defined as violence or not.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in