• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

PREVIEW-Ep. 278: Derrick Bell on the Dynamics of Racism (Part Two)

September 29, 2021 by Mark Linsenmayer 4 Comments

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PREVIEW-PEL_ep_278pt2_8-29-21.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 10:53 — 10.0MB)

Subscribe to get Part 2 of this episode in its entirety. Citizens can get it here.

Continuing from part one on Faces At the Bottom of the Well (1992) with guest Lawrence Ware. We discuss "The Racial Preference Licensing Act" (ch. 3), which plays with an idea (attributed to his fictional alter ego Geneva Crenshaw) that since businesses continue to discriminate (in hiring if not in excluding clientele), maybe we should license the activity, so a business that wants to be racist will have to a) declare it, b) be consistently racist, and c) pay into a reparations fund, e.g. to black educational institutions. Would such a proposal actually deal more honestly with this intractable problem?

In the full episode, we also cover "Divining a Racial Realism Theory" (ch. 5), and "The Rules of Racial Standing" (ch. 6).

Ch. 5 depicts Bell debating a different fictional character, the gun-toting Erika Wechsler who meets the description of today's Antifa. Her "racial realism" is an excuse to compare today's situation with regard to the failure of civil rights laws to achieve desired effects to the arguments of legal realists in 1930s who objected to the classical structure of law as formal group of "common law" rules. Clearly during the Great Depression, circumstances required government to go beyond its usual role to meet human need, yet conservative courts could not interpret the Constitution to allow these necessary actions to take place.

Finally, ch. 6 discusses the political rhetoric as it applies to race: Blacks' accounts of racial discrimination inevitably are thought of as requiring white support or need to be "taken with a grain of salt," since black people are interpreted as biased in this area. The exception is when a black person speaks out against other blacks, at which point whites amplify that voice. Finally, whenever a black speaker says something that upsets white people, whites demand that all other black figures denounce the offending speaker.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Announcements

Comments

  1. Eric says

    September 28, 2021 at 1:00 pm

    Seth, I literally posted on Twitter about how I had never studied any Derrick Bell before right before you mentioned it in this Derrick Bell discussion.

    Reply
  2. Erik says

    October 23, 2021 at 8:24 am

    These episodes were a great introduction to Derrick Bell and I am glad you are dealing with these contemporary topics as well as Hegel and Aristotle. I was, however, disappointed in the way you all just dismissed John McWhorter’s work because he doesn’t agree with the progressive mainstream rather than taking his arguments seriously and showing why you think he is wrong. If the podcast has room for such disparate thinkers as Hegel and Levinas then there must be room for Bell and McWhorter. Those of us who don’t live in progressive bubbles have to encounter these arguments all the time and can’t dismiss them so easily, nor do we convince anyone of anything if we do.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      October 25, 2021 at 10:10 am

      That was sloppily done on our part. The point (in my mind) was not to dismiss McWhorter but to use him as a potential example to see if Bell’s rules of racial standing make sense. Whatever the quality of McWhorter’s thought, do you really think he would be as famous if he were not an African-American making these kinds of political claims? Bell claims no. I suggested we actually try to get McWhorter on the show, but none of my co-hosts seemed too interested in giving further airtime to what is essentially a political dispute. I think we treated him charitably back in our White Privilege episode where we actually read one of his articles.

      Reply
  3. Jeremy Thornburg says

    December 8, 2021 at 3:28 pm

    I haven’t listened for a while, but the topic of race has drawn me in for some time and I continue to learn more. Having listened to this episode I plan on reading Faces At the Bottom of the Well. I enjoyed your collected reflections on the podcasts you have done with Lawrence in the past specifically the admission of your misunderstanding of issue of race having its own well of philosophical texts. I am interested in Seth’s comment about not having been aware/assigned some of the texts when he was younger in light of his strong reaction some years ago to the student lead challenge to the curriculum at Reed. I ask as a fan not a critic. I hope my kids want to go to Reed or a school with a reputation like it and after hearing his admission of ignorance immediately wondered if he has a different since of that moment. Thanks for all that you do.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?
  • Ronald Cogen on Ep. 311: Understanding the Dao De Jing (Part One)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in