• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)

October 24, 2022 by Mark Linsenmayer 5 Comments

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_302pt2_9-13-22.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 47:11 — 43.3MB)

Subscribe to get Parts 1 and 2 ad-free, plus a supporter exclusive Part 3, which you can preview.

Continuing from part one on The Praise of Folly (1509) with guest Nathan Gilmour.

Can foolishness actually make us more prudent, which sounds like its opposite? Well, having the wisdom to avoid all trouble keeps us from getting experience that would be helpful in acting more wisely in the long run.

Erasmus (speaking with the voice of Folly) claims that foolishness in some measure is essential for getting along in the world, being creative, and performing great deeds.

At the same time, the second part of the text is a straightforward critique of Catholic theologians: their arrogance, wealth, superficiality, theatricality, and other un-Christian characteristics.

Wes and Nathan mention Michael Massing's Fatal Discord: Erasmus, Luther, and the Fight for the Western Mind.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Erasmus, philosophy podcast, Renaissance philosophy, wisdom

Comments

  1. Jack Baret says

    October 30, 2022 at 10:11 am

    Great fun and interesting around the table discussion about lightening up! I invite many co-workers to not take the job so seriously especially working with difficult people and special needs students!

    Reply
  2. Jack Baret says

    October 30, 2022 at 10:21 am

    I love your podcast and your show is great fun and an interesting around the table discussion about lightening up with religion and philosophy. I invite many co-workers to not take the job so seriously especially working with difficult people (staff) and special needs students!

    Can someone, the host or guests, please give me a short review on my anthology “Beyond Human Existence-Living and Dying in Suburbia” by my pen name-Angelo Zuccaro. I am on Amazon.

    Regards; Jack

    Reply
  3. Joanthan says

    January 7, 2023 at 11:03 am

    Why So Serious?

    Reply
  4. Varun Narasimhachar says

    January 8, 2023 at 4:21 am

    Great conversations! I just wanted to chime in on the distinction between “serious” and “silly / playful”. I think there are two points to acknowledge on this.

    1. Maybe we can’t make a hard, black and white distinction. The best we can do is to identify a gradation and say things like “researching cancer is more serious than collecting star wars memorabilia”. And even that not in a way that we can generally agree on.
    2. Ultimately, is there any such thing as an activity or an end being irrefutably “dead serious”? That is, can we ever make a case for anything (e.g. cancer research) being a fundamental imperative in our existence, in a way that fandom isn’t? Likewise, can we irrefutably establish something (e.g. fandom) as being pointless? I don’t think so. I don’t think the universe gives us any fundamental imperatives or fundamental sillinesses.

    As a species we could totally collectively turn nihilistic one fine day, fail to carry out basic activities that sustain our lives and societies, and die out. Nothing can stop us, save our own self-preserving instincts and pragmatism. In this sense, I think we are carrying out activities all the time that we consider obligatory, but never bother to rigorously establish as such. By all means we should, and indeed by all means, for similar pragmatic reasons we should allow ourselves to engage in silly endeavors too.

    Reply
    • Mark Linsenmayer says

      January 23, 2023 at 7:44 am

      Thanks, Varun!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Seth Paskin on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • John Heath on PEL Eulogies Nightcap Late March 2023
  • Randy Strader on Ep. 309: Wittgenstein On Certainty (Part Two)
  • Wes Alwan on PEL Nightcap February 2023
  • Kunal on Why Don’t We Like Idealism?

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in