• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 306: Dworkin and the Dobbs Decision (Part One)

December 12, 2022 by Mark Linsenmayer Leave a Comment

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_306pt1_11-20-22.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 43:48 — 40.2MB)

Subscribe to get parts 1 and 2 of this now, ad-free.

Does the U.S. Constitution guarantee the right to an abortion? Mark, Wes, Dylan, and Seth are joined by lawyer/sister Robin Linsenmayer to discuss Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2021) and Ronald Dworkin's "Unenumerated Rights: Whether and How Roe Should be Overruled" (1992).

We previously considered Dworkin's take on what judges do when law is ambiguous. According to his take on abortion, which describes reasonably well the principles that underlie the dissent by Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan in this case, the wording in the 14th Amendment and elsewhere in the Constitution is purposefully abstract and idealistic: "Equal protection under law and "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." What is included in that big word "liberty" (and thus "protection") here can't just be what was at the moment of this amendment's ratification in 1868, but is something that society makes discoveries about as time goes on. Crucially, we've discovered it does involve a right to make person decisions about one's family, and so implies marriage equality, the right to use birth control, and the right to abortion. Without this last, according to the dissent, women are effectively denied full participation in our democracy, so abortion laws violate equal protection as well as due process.

Conservative jurisprudence does not buy any of this, and Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion denies any such reading of the 14th Amendment. The majority opinion by Samuel Alito limits itself to pointing out that abortion is different than the other rights in question (marriage equality and birth control) in that it involves another life, and so claims of liberty in the form of bodily autonomy or privacy do not apply to this. Instead, the decision countermands the highly contentious issue of how heavily to weigh the relative interests of the mother and the fetus to legislatures to decide. Alito concludes that justices in Roe v. Wade were wrong to impose their own legislative-sounding solution on this problem.

We try to figure out what all Dworkin's criteria should restrict (can states outlaw bigamy?), how freedom of religion plays into beliefs about life as it relates to abortion, what to do with frozen embryos, and more.

Read the Dworkin article online. Read the Dobbs decision online. For another take on Dobbs that explicitly runs counter to Dworkin's listen to Brian Leiter's appearance on the Brain in a Vat podcast.

Sponsor: Check out the Conversations with Coleman podcast.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: Philosophy of Law, philosophy podcast, Ronald Dworkin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in