• Log In

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Subscribe on Android Spotify Google Podcasts audible patreon
  • Home
  • Podcast
    • PEL Network Episodes
    • Publicly Available PEL Episodes
    • Paywalled and Ad-Free Episodes
    • PEL Episodes by Topic
    • Nightcap
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Pretty Much Pop
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • (sub)Text
    • Phi Fic Podcast
    • Combat & Classics
    • Constellary Tales
  • Blog
  • About
    • PEL FAQ
    • Meet PEL
    • About Pretty Much Pop
    • Philosophy vs. Improv
    • Nakedly Examined Music
    • Meet Phi Fic
    • Listener Feedback
    • Links
  • Join
    • Become a Citizen
    • Join Our Mailing List
    • Log In
  • Donate
  • Store
    • Episodes
    • Swag
    • Everything Else
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • My Account
  • Contact
  • Mailing List

Ep. 307: G.E. Moore Defends Common Sense (Part Two)

January 2, 2023 by Mark Linsenmayer 1 Comment

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PEL_ep_307pt2_12-11-22.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 49:58 — 45.8MB)

Subscribe to get both parts of this episode ad free, plus a supporter exclusive PEL Nightcap discussion.

Continuing from part one on "A Defense of Common Sense" (1925), now down to Mark, Wes, and Dylan.

We get into the nitty gritty of Moore's argument: Against idealism, Moore argues that physical facts are in now way dependent on mental facts; for instance, the existence and position of the moon don't depend on anyone's beliefs about the moon. Reality is mind independent.

When you hold up your hand and identify it as your hand, what's going on? On Moore's account, you are seeing a sense datum: a certain part of the surface of your hand that represents the hand as a whole. So what does "represents" mean here? If we're only perceiving the sense data and not the hand, what warrants us to believe in the hand?

Moore considers three options for the ontology of sense data: A direct realist says that the sense data literally are part of the hand, even though everyone's perspective (sense data) when they look at the hand are slightly different. A representationalist says that the sense data are not the object but instead stand in a definite relation to the object (Moore thinks this relation is basic and unanalyzable). A dispositionalist defines the object as a something out in the world that causes all of the perceptions that we have of it. Moore finds problems with all of these, but they increasingly diverge from common sense.

As we'll see in episode 308 when we talk about Moore's "Proof of an External World" (planned for this episode, but we were too slow working through this), Moore's position was a version of the second option: Sense data are not the same as the object, but we don't just have the sense data; we also apprehend a proposition that the object exists (and has some properties)

Mark refers to our episode on Schopenhauer's Kantian epistemology. Anther point of contrast is Descartes' Rules for Direction of the Mind. A modern critique of Moore's epistemology is Sellars' argument against sense-data, i.e. "the myth of the given."

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Filed Under: Podcast Episodes Tagged With: epistemology, G.E. Moore

Comments

  1. Alan Anderson says

    January 3, 2023 at 12:49 am

    I loved this episode, but would bet that many got lost. As a long time listener, I understood probably 92,324%. (Descartes joke) of your cross references (Hume vs Kant, Descartes vs Bacon, implicit Spinoza (God is what’s here now), implicit Wittgenstein (language), and Socrates vs Plato and/or Aristotle, etc), but I’d wager it sent quite a few a’Googlin’ or off to reverie. This isn’t really a criticism, as I rather enjoyed the effort it took, but that it makes me wonder whether you might want to rate each episode on a 1-5 scale of understanding of or interest in understanding the external references. I also love the “no name-dropping” , but this topic probably can’t be understood without a pretty good familiarity with most of the cards that provide the structure on which it stands.

    Keep being awesome.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PEL Live Show 2023

Brothers K Live Show

Citizenship has its Benefits

Become a PEL Citizen
Become a PEL Citizen, and get access to all paywalled episodes, early and ad-free, including exclusive Part 2's for episodes starting September 2020; our after-show Nightcap, where the guys respond to listener email and chat more causally; a community of fellow learners, and more.

Rate and Review

Nightcap

Listen to Nightcap
On Nightcap, listen to the guys respond to listener email and chat more casually about their lives, the making of the show, current events and politics, and anything else that happens to come up.

Subscribe to Email Updates

Select list(s):

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Support PEL

Buy stuff through Amazon and send a few shekels our way at no extra cost to you.

Tweets by PartiallyExLife

Recent Comments

  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 302: Erasmus Praises Foolishness (Part Two)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)
  • Mark Linsenmayer on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • MartinK on Ep. 201: Marcus Aurelius’s Stoicism with Ryan Holiday (Citizen Edition)
  • Wayne Barr on Ep. 308: Moore’s Proof of Mind-Independent Reality (Part Two for Supporters)

About The Partially Examined Life

The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion

Become a PEL Citizen!

As a PEL Citizen, you’ll have access to a private social community of philosophers, thinkers, and other partial examiners where you can join or initiate discussion groups dedicated to particular readings, participate in lively forums, arrange online meet-ups for impromptu seminars, and more. PEL Citizens also have free access to podcast transcripts, guided readings, episode guides, PEL music, and other citizen-exclusive material. Click here to join.

Blog Post Categories

  • (sub)Text
  • Aftershow
  • Announcements
  • Audiobook
  • Book Excerpts
  • Citizen Content
  • Citizen Document
  • Citizen News
  • Close Reading
  • Combat and Classics
  • Constellary Tales
  • Exclude from Newsletter
  • Featured Ad-Free
  • Featured Article
  • General Announcements
  • Interview
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Misc. Philosophical Musings
  • Nakedly Examined Music Podcast
  • Nakedly Self-Examined Music
  • NEM Bonus
  • Not School Recording
  • Not School Report
  • Other (i.e. Lesser) Podcasts
  • PEL Music
  • PEL Nightcap
  • PEL's Notes
  • Personal Philosophies
  • Phi Fic Podcast
  • Philosophy vs. Improv
  • Podcast Episode (Citizen)
  • Podcast Episodes
  • Pretty Much Pop
  • Reviewage
  • Song Self-Exam
  • Supporter Exclusive
  • Things to Watch
  • Vintage Episode (Citizen)
  • Web Detritus

Follow:

Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | Apple Podcasts

Copyright © 2009 - 2023 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use · Copyright Policy

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in