The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast
A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog
Continuing on “What Is Love?” (1992). We consider B’s account of love as resolution of a paradox: The positions of man and woman in no way overlap, yet all truth is generic, i.e. accessible to everyone. Love makes it happen!
If you’re not hearing the full version of this part of the discussion, sign up via one of the options described at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support.
On “What Is Love,” which is ch. 11 of Conditions (1992). We see what it means to call love a “truth procedure”: It’s a new way of seeing, through the eyes of the Two, not the merger of two souls or the loving of god through another. Does B’s pseudo-mathematical language about this make sense?
Sponsors: Get your first bag of coffee free and $5 off your bundle at DrinkTrade.com/pel (code pel). Get a free month’s access to a vast library of guided meditations at Headspace.com/PEL. Get connected with a licensed therapist at betterhelp.com/partially. Get 20% off your first box off cool stuff from at boxofawesome.com (code pel). Have a donation to charity of up to $250 matched through givewell.org/PEL.
Continuing on “What Is Love?” (1992). We consider B’s account of love as resolution of a paradox: The positions of man and woman in no way overlap, yet all truth is generic, i.e. accessible to everyone. Love makes it happen!
On “What Is Love?” (Ch. 11 of Conditions, 1992).
We discuss love as a “truth procedure”: a new vantage point that love enables about difference that’s socially foundational.
Continuing on Conditions, “The (Re)turn of Philosophy Itself.”
What makes philosophy possible? The four “conditions,” i.e. mathematics, politics, art, and love, generate the truths, and philosophy is the pincers that gather these together in thought. But how exactly?
If you’re not hearing the full version of this part of the discussion, sign up via one of the options described at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support.
We talk more potential future philosophy of science topics, philosophy of mathematics, wet vs. dry science, sobriety, things Seth is reading, and more.
John has released 45 albums since 1975 of original folk, traditional folk, children’s music (garnering six Grammy nominations for those), and instrumentals: He is fluent on guitar, banjo, violin, dulcimer, and more.
His songs very often tell stories, and we discuss several of those: “Atonement” from Bucket List (2021), “Soup” from Wintersongs (1995), and “Water from Another Time” from Gonna Rise Again (1987). We end by listening to “The Night John Prine Died” from Cabin Fever: Songs from Quarantine (2020). Intro: “Christmas in the Trenches” from Winter Solstice (1984). For more, see folkmusic.com.
Hear more Nakedly Examined Music. Like our Facebook page. Support us on Patreon.
Sponsors: Gift one annual membership and get one free at MasterClass.com/examined. Get 3 months free of Amazon Music Unlimited at Amazon.com/nempod.
Mark is joined by Brian Hirt, Erin Conrad, and Brian Casey to discuss the new film, the old ones, and the book series. Is it really adaptable given the deep lore and the vast time jumps?
For more, visit prettymuchpop.com. Hear bonus content for this episode at patreon.com/prettymuchpop or by subscribing via Apple Podcasts to the Mark Lintertainment Channel.
Sponsors: Book a top-rated doctor by getting the Zocdoc ad at Zocdoc.com/PMP. Get a loan to lower your monthly payments at Upstart.com/PRETTY.
Featuring TWO guest improvisers, Jill, co-founder of HUGE Theater and her friend Michelle, owner of Improv MKE.
Bill and our guests each start a scene to explore something of what utopia might amount to, and of course how it will inevitably go bad. Could there be some single utopia for everyone?
Mark philosophizes at partiallyexaminedlife.com.
Bill improvises (and teaches) at chicagoimprovstudio.com.
Hear more Philosophy vs. Improv. Support the podcast to get all our post-game discussions and other bonus stuff.
Sponsors: Visit betterhelp.com/improv to be matched with a licensed, professional therapist. Learn about St. John’s College at sjc.edu/improv.
Diana Christensen is a television executive in search of an angry show—something that articulates the rage of the average viewer. In Howard Beale, failed newscaster turned mad-as-hell prophet, she seems to get exactly what she’s looking for. Yet in doing so, she reduces political and social discontent to a form of entertainment focused on generating audience excitement and television ratings. Wes & Erin discuss the 1976 film “Network,” which seems to suggest that with the advent of mass media, acts of anti-establishment defiance tend to be incorporated by the systems they oppose.
On Conditions (1992), Ch. 1 “The (Re)turn of Philosophy Itself.”
Against post-structuralists who deny Truth, Badiou argues that truths are generated by the truth conditions (politics, art, love, and science/math) which philosophy then thinks into a unified vision.
Sponsors: Get connected with a licensed therapist at betterhelp.com/partially. Get 20% off your first box off cool stuff from at boxofawesome.com (code pel). Learn about St. John’s College at sjc.edu/pel. Have a donation to charity of up to $250 matched through givewell.org/PEL.
Continuing on Conditions, “The (Re)turn of Philosophy Itself.” What makes philosophy possible?
The four “conditions,” i.e. mathematics, politics, art, and love, generate the truths, and philosophy is the pincers that gather these together in thought. But how exactly?
On Conditions (1992), Ch. 1 “The (Re)turn of Philosophy Itself.”
Contra post-structuralists who deny Truth, Badiou argues that truths are generated by the truth conditions (politics, art, love, and science/math) which philosophy then thinks into a unified vision.
We talk post-Feyerabend, feminist philosophy of science, Badiou, learning languages, audiobooks, Dune, and The Last Duel.
Riffing on resemblance. Eventually invoking the spirit of a toaster. Mark is wrong: the God Emperor of Dune can’t drink water at all, just dried food.
Mark philosophizes at partiallyexaminedlife.com.
Bill improvises (and teaches) at chicagoimprovstudio.com.
Hear more Philosophy vs. Improv. Support the podcast to get all our post-game discussions and other bonus stuff.
Sponsors: Visit betterhelp.com/improv to be matched with a licensed, professional therapist. Learn about St. John’s College at sjc.edu/improv.
Continuing on “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes” (1970).
We distinguish various kinds of falsificationism and give more details about Lakatos’ concept of a scientific research program.
If you’re not hearing the full version of this part of the discussion, sign up via one of the options described at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support.
Steve is best known as guitarist/arranger for Oingo Boingo through their eight albums from 1981-1995 and for following its leader Danny Elfman into a life creating movie soundtracks. However, his activity as composer goes all the way back to the late ’60s.
We discuss “Tango” by jackiO from their self-titled album (2019), “The Wake” and “Checking Out/Streets of Managu” from his soundtracks to Guilty as Charged (1991) and The Art of Travel (2008), and “Rainy Day Mushroom Pillow” by Strawberry Alarm Clock from Incense and Peppermints (1967). Outro: “Nothing to Feel” by Fejj from Alive (1979) Intro: the title track to Dead Man’s Party by Oingo Boingo (1985).
Hear more Nakedly Examined Music. Like our Facebook page. Support us on Patreon.
Sponsor: Upgrade your showering at nebia.com/nem (code NEM).
In light of the release of The Last Duel, we talk about the trope of the honor-resolving duel in movies and TV. Mark and guest co-host Dylan Casey from PEL are joined by Clif Mark, host of the Good in Theory podcast.
We touch on The Duelists, A Knight’s Tale, The Duelist and The Duel (two 2016 films), Dune, Hamilton, and philosophers like Hegel and Nietzsche.
For more, visit prettymuchpop.com. Hear bonus content for this episode at patreon.com/prettymuchpop or by subscribing via Apple Podcasts to the Mark Lintertainment Channel.
Sponsors: Get 20% off your first box from Bespoke Post at boxofawesome.com. (code pretty). Get 15% off your next gift at uncommongoods.com/PMP. Use the code “Pretty” at Nebia.com/pretty to get 10% off a superior shower experience.
https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PvI_016_9-20-21_Public.mp3Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 49:32 — 49.2MB)Do you believe in miracles? If doctors believed in miracles, would they just let surgeries finish themselves? Do assumptions of a logical universe make it not just unjustified by psychologically impossible for us to really believe in miracles? Read about our VERY FIRST guest, Tim Sniffen at timsniffen.com. Follow him Continue Reading …
His first claim to fame was the solution to a riddle that earned him a kingdom by sheer force of intellect. His second was a doomed attempt to escape the particularly gruesome fates of patricide and incest. With his first act, Oedipus saved the city of Thebes from the sphinx; with his second, he afflicted it with a plague. In his retelling of this myth, Sophocles reflects on the competing claims of three paths to knowledge: reason, revelation, and experience. Why can’t Oedipus’s brilliant mind save him from the enactment of a prophecy? Why might we be most vulnerable to the fate we’re most determined to avoid? Can we truly be free, or are our attempts to transcend the limitations of character central to its pathologies? Wes & Erin discuss Sophocles’ “Oedipus Rex.”
